1 / 27

STUDENTS BUILDING MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH COMMUNICATION

STUDENTS BUILDING MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH COMMUNICATION. Elizabeth B. Uptegrove uptegrovee@felician.edu Carolyn A. Maher cmaher@rci.rutgers.edu Rutgers University Graduate School of Education. Research Question. Theoretical Framework. Maher (1998)

foy
Download Presentation

STUDENTS BUILDING MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH COMMUNICATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STUDENTS BUILDING MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH COMMUNICATION Elizabeth B. Uptegrove uptegrovee@felician.edu Carolyn A. Maher cmaher@rci.rutgers.edu Rutgers University Graduate School of Education

  2. Research Question

  3. Theoretical Framework • Maher (1998) • Communicating their ideas helps students to develop and consolidate mathematical thinking • Justifying their thinking helps students develop mathematical reasoning skills • Sfard (2001) • Students learn to think mathematically by participating in discourse about ideas – arguing, asking questions, and anticipating feedback

  4. Background • Longitudinal study (Maher, 2005) • Public school students were followed from first grade through college • After-school problem-investigation session involving four students during the sophomore year of high school (March 1998)

  5. Data Sources and Analysis • Data • Videotapes (two cameras) • Student work • Analysis • Transcripts verified and reviewed • Events selected for analysis • Student work on Pascal’s Triangle • Mathematical ideas described and analyzed

  6. Problems Investigated • Pizza: How many pizzas is it possible to make when there are n toppings to choose from? • Towers: How many towers n cubes tall can be built when choosing from white and blue cubes?

  7. Students’ Earlier Findings • The answer to both problems is 2n • The answers to the towers problem can be enumerated by the numbers in row n of Pascal’s Triangle • C(n,r) gives the number of towers with exactly r blue cubes when selecting from blue and white cubes • They are not sure how the pizza problem fits with Pascal’s Triangle

  8. Results • First, students communicated their ideas about relationships: • Between towers and Pascal’s Triangle and the binomial expansion • Between pizza problem and Pascal’s Triangle • Students provided support for these ideas • They answered questions • They responded to arguments • Then they described how the towers and pizza problems are related to each other

  9. Episode 1: Towers • Students represented (a+b)2 by towers two cubes tall • Students related those towers to row 2 of Pascal’s Triangle

  10. Episode 1: Towers

  11. Episode 1: Towers(continued) • Building towers can be related to expanding the binomial (a+b) • Adding a blue cube is like multiplying by a • Adding a white cube is like multiplying by b

  12. Episode 2: Pizzas

  13. Episode 2: Pizzas • Students try to explain how the different two-topping pizzas can be found in row 2 of Pascal’s Triangle • Row 2 is: 1 2 1 1 = plain pizza 2 = one pepperoni, one pepper 1 = both toppings • But students do not identify this relationship; instead Ankur proposes: • 1 = pepperoni • 2 = both (counted twice) • 1 = peppers • ? = plain

  14. Episode 3: Connecting Towers & Pizzas

  15. Episode 3: Connecting Towers & Pizzas • Michael’s insight • Blue cube = topping present • White cube = topping not present • The others built on this insight

  16. Analysis UsingConversational Turns • Conversational turn units are “tied sequences of utterances that constitute speakers’ turn at talk and at holding the floor” (Powell, 2003) • Used to measure students’ participation in discourse • Coded for types of discourse • Asking questions or expressing uncertainty • Answering questions • Disagreeing • Making connections • Expressing understanding

  17. Students’ Participationin Discourse

  18. Types of Discourse inConversational Turns

  19. Summary • Episodes 1 and 2 • Students communicated their ideas about Pascal’s Triangle and its relationship to the towers and pizza problems • Students supported their ideas through demonstrations and by offering specific examples • Episode 3 • Students built on Michael’s critical insight • Students described a new connection: the isomorphism between the towers and pizza problems

  20. Conclusions • The framework for developing a new connection was provided by earlier discussions about Pascal’s Triangle • Communicating about and supporting those earlier ideas helped students make this connection between two problems of equivalent structure

  21. Questions?

  22. Pascal’s Triangle

  23. Pascal’s Triangle

  24. Pascal’s Triangle

More Related