1 / 20

The impact of p arents´employment on gender inequalities in the Czech Republic after 1989 *

The impact of p arents´employment on gender inequalities in the Czech Republic after 1989 *. Hana Maříková Institute of Sociology, CAS, v.v.i. Praha. Changes after 1989 in the CR. CR – the country with a very low fertility rate Decrease in female employment

fraley
Download Presentation

The impact of p arents´employment on gender inequalities in the Czech Republic after 1989 *

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The impact of parents´employmenton gender inequalities in the Czech Republic after 1989 * Hana Maříková Institute of Sociology, CAS, v.v.i. Praha

  2. Changes after 1989 in the CR • CR – the country with a very low fertility rate • Decrease in female employment • Debates on fertility + female employment (debates on welfare state + gender regime)

  3. Graph 1: Fertility rate in the CR

  4. Graph 2: An average age of mothers in the 1st childbirth, in all childbirths

  5. Female employment and its context in the CR • Before and after 1989: 46 % of women in the 80s, 44.3 % in 1990 • Changes in social policies – family policy and employment policy affected W´s + M´s lifes and work paths as parents (the right to care preferred to right to work in the W´s case)

  6. Table 1: The number of nurseries in the Czech Republic since 1988

  7. Graph 3: Femele employment rate in the Visegrad countries

  8. Graph 4: Employment impact of parenthood - female

  9. Graph 5: Employment impact of parenthood - male

  10. What about men – fathers in the CR? • Until 1990 (parental) allowance for fathers only in specific life situations (Act No. 110/1984 Sb.) • October 1990: „parental allowance“ was introduced (e.g. also for all fathers) • 2001: parental leave (in the Labour Code)

  11. Graph 6: Absolute number of men on the parental leave (or at home to take care) in a given year (in thousands)

  12. Graph 7: Women on parental leave as percentage of the total number of parents on the parental leave in a given year

  13. Causes of low representation of men on parental leave Institutional level: • Until 2008: a parental allowance = one fixed sum • After 2008: 3 fixed sums • Absence of a parental quota • Absence of paternal (daddy) leave • Lack of support on the company level

  14. Graph 8: Uptake of parental leave by Norwegian fathers (of those who were entitled to the leave) between 1988 and 1998 (in %) • Source: Brandt and Kvande 1995.

  15. Impact of motherhood on female work • Lower career chances • Lower income • Higher unemployment rate (see next slide) • Lower pensions (women´s average pension in the long term = 0.81 % of men´s average pension)

  16. Graph 9: Female unemployment by age (in %)

  17. Table 2: Gender pay gap in the average gross hourly wage by age (women compared to men in 2004 and 2010)

  18. Inequalities in the private sphere • Unequal distribution of the domestic work and child care • In 63.5 % families with children up to 10 – traditional division of labour and care (Parents 2005) • Family as an inhibitor for women in the LM • Family as a stimulator for men

  19. Conclusion • Reinforcing familialistic tendency in the Czech family policy / male breadwinner – female carer model - low fertility rate - low employment rate of mothers - lower chances on the LM for mothers - increase in gender inequalities in the sphere of paid work + unpaid work (in the private sphere) Questions: For whom is this model adventageous? Is not finally time to change it?

  20. Thank you! Hana Maříková hana.marikova@soc.cas.cz

More Related