1 / 27

Modeling AMD Geochemistry in Underground Mines

Modeling AMD Geochemistry in Underground Mines. Bruce Leavitt PE PG, Consulting Hydrogeologist James Stiles PhD PE, Limestone Engineering Raymond Lovett PhD, Shipshaper LLC. Limitations of existing AMD Prediction Methods Only considers Acid and Base Potential

frayne
Download Presentation

Modeling AMD Geochemistry in Underground Mines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modeling AMD Geochemistry in Underground Mines Bruce Leavitt PE PG, Consulting Hydrogeologist James Stiles PhD PE, Limestone Engineering Raymond Lovett PhD, Shipshaper LLC

  2. Limitations of existing AMD Prediction Methods • Only considers Acid and Base Potential • Does not consider Latent Acidity • Does not consider Oxygen Depletion • Does not consider Solute Transport • Does not consider Recharge Water Chemistry and Volume

  3. Study Purpose To investigate the suitability of the model to underground mine discharges. To determine the appropriate mineral assemblage and mass concentration. To compare the model in different hydrologic settings. To evaluate the sensitivity of the model to variations in input values comparable to typical field variations.

  4. Three Hydrologic Settings

  5. Effect of Flooding on Mine Water Chemistry • Rapid dissolution of acidic salts • Exclusion of oxygen from the mine • Chemical reaction with recharging ground water.

  6. TOUGHREACTEarth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory TOUGHREACT was designed to solve the coupled equations of sub-surface multi-phase fluid and heat flow, solute transport, and chemical reactions in both the saturated and unsaturated aquifer zones. This program can be applied to many geologic systems and environmental problems, including geothermal systems, diagenetic and weathering processes, subsurface waste disposal, acid mine drainage remediation, contaminant transport, and groundwater quality.

  7. Model Configuration

  8. Mineral Assemblage

  9. Mineral Assemblage cont.

  10. Archetype pH

  11. Archetype Iron

  12. Model Results pH

  13. Model Results Iron

  14. Pyrite Kinetic Data Neutral 2.818 x 10-6 mol-m-2-s-1 McKibben and Barnes (1986a) Neutral 3.167 x 10-10 mol-m-2-s-1 McKibben and Barnes (1986b), Nicholson (1994), and Nicholson and Sharer (1994) Acidic 3.020 x 10-9 mol-m-2-s-1 Acidic 1.553 x 10-8 mol-m-2-s-1 McKibben and Barnes (1986b), Brown and Jurinak (1989), and Rimstidt, et al. (1994) Acidic 6.0 x 10-10 mol-m-2-s-1 Calibrated

  15. Ferrous Ferric Oxidation Fe+2 + 1/4O2 + H+ > Fe+3 +1/2 H2O Oxidation rate is pH dependant. Model holds ferrous and ferric iron in equilibrium. Model overstates ferric iron concentration leading to excess pyrite oxidation.

  16. High Dilution pHYear 5

  17. High Dilution pHYear 10

  18. High Dilution pHYear 15

  19. High Dilution pHYear 20

  20. High Dilution IronYear 5

  21. High Dilution IronYear 10

  22. High Dilution IronYear 15

  23. High Dilution IronYear 20

  24. Modeling Difficulties Ferrous iron oxidation Insufficient aluminum production CO2 partial pressure spikes at full mine flooding Mine complexity is limited by computational capacity Homogeneous mineral distribution Mine atmosphere composition

  25. Other Results Gypsum precipitation / dissolution in the mine Goethite precipitation in the mine. Elimination of pryhotite and the reduction of the pyrite kinetic rate has reduced the observed difference in water pH and iron between the high dilution and low dilution cases.

  26. Future Work Resolve the iron oxidation issue Closed mine atmosphere sampling. Sensitivity analysis of input parameters including: recharge chemistry, mine geometry, initial melanterite and calcite concentrations. Testing of in situ remedial options.

  27. Conclusions The TOUGHREACT program allows chemical and hydrodynamic interaction in a flooded and unflooded underground mine environment. TOUGHREACT is able to emulate the change in discharge chemistry with time. It is a useful tool in understanding acid formation, solute transport, and discharge relationships. Due to the extensive number of assumptions it is not, at this time, a suitable permitting tool.

More Related