130 likes | 168 Views
This study compares outcomes of ≥12 hours vs. ≥24 hours bed rest after acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapy. Results suggest that shorter bed rest may be safe, reduce neurological deficits, shorten hospital stays, and lower readmission rates. Further research is required for validation.
E N D
12 versus 24-hour Bed Rest after Acute Ischemic Stroke Reperfusion Therapy Brian Silver, MD, Tariq Hamid, MD; Muhib Khan, MD; Mario DiNapoli, MD; Reza Behrouz, DO; Gustavo Saposnik, MD; Jo-Ann Sarafin, RNP; Susan Martin, OT; MajazMoonis, MD; Nils Henninger, MD, PhD; Richard Goddeau, MD; Adalia Jun-O’Connell, MD; Shawna M Cutting, MD, MS; Ali Saad, MD; ShadiYaghi, MD; Wiley Hall, MD; Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH; Raphael Carandang, MD; Marcey Osgood, DO; Bradford B. Thompson, MD; Corey R Fehnel, MD; Linda C. Wendell, MD; N. Stevenson Potter, MD; James M Gilchrist, MD; Bruce Barton, PhD
Disclosures • Salary: UMassMemorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Joint Commission (surveyor) • Consultant fees: Women’s Health Initiative, Medicolegal malpractice review • Honoraria: Ebix publishing, MedLink, Medscape
Background • The practice of bed rest for ≥24 hours after reperfusion therapy became standard after the NINDS rt-PA trial. • Yet, the optimal timing of mobilization in these patients is unknown. • Current guidelines recommend against high-dose, very early mobilization within 24 hours of stroke onset as a class III recommendation.
Hypothesis • We hypothesized that at a protocol of ≥12 hours bed rest was not inferior to ≥24 hours bed rest following stroke reperfusion therapy. • Secondary hypotheses were that rates of pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, and lengths of stay would be reduced in patients in the ≥12 hours bed rest group.
Goals • The goal of the study was to compare discharge outcomes among patients who had ≥24 hours bed rest following acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapy with ≥12 hours bed rest.
Design • Single center • Retrospective • Before and after (January 27, 2014) • Consecutive patients • Adjustments for age, sex, admission NIHSS, time to treatment • Analyses separated by 1) intravenous thrombolysis only patients, and 2) thrombectomy patients with or without intravenous thrombolysis
Thrombolysis Only patients ¹Favorable outcome: discharge to home, home with services, or acute rehabilitation. * P-values from likelihood ratio chi-square test for proportions, from standard two-sample two-sided t-test for normally distributed means, and from Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-normally distributed variables. ** Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (m/f), admission NIHSS (continuous), tPA received (yes/no: including bolus for endovascular treated patients), endovascular treatment (yes/no), and time to treatment (tPA or time to groin puncture, whichever is first). For medical complications, endovascular treatment could not be used in adjustment due to convergence failure. † Odds ratio for 12 hours relative to 24 hours (OR < 1.0 indicates 12 hour outcome lower than 24 hour outcome); difference for 12 – 24 hour outcome (difference < 0.0 indicates 12 hour outcome lower than 24 hour outcome) †† Adjusted p-value for van Elteren non-parametric test to compare non-normal continuous outcomes (NIHSS) between assigned bedtime adjusted for covariates: sex, NIHSS at admission. Resulting score statistic not presented.
Thrombectomy Patients (with/without tPA) ¹Favorable outcome: discharge to home, home with services, or acute rehabilitation. * P-values from likelihood ratio chi-square test for proportions, from standard two-sample two-sided t-test for normally distributed means, and from Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-normally distributed variables. ** Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (m/f), admission NIHSS (continuous), tPA received (yes/no: including bolus for endovascular treated patients), endovascular treatment (yes/no), and time to treatment (tPA or time to groin puncture, whichever is first). For medical complications, endovascular treatment could not be used in adjustment due to convergence failure. † Odds ratio for 12 hours relative to 24 hours (OR < 1.0 indicates 12 hour outcome lower than 24 hour outcome); difference for 12 – 24 hour outcome (difference < 0.0 indicates 12 hour outcome lower than 24 hour outcome) †† Adjusted p-value for van Elteren non-parametric test to compare non-normal continuous outcomes (NIHSS) between assigned bedtime adjusted for covariates: sex, NIHSS at admission. Resulting score statistic not presented.
Conclusions • Compared with ≥24 hour bed rest, ≥12 hour bed rest after acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapy appeared to be safe and may be associated with reduced neurological deficit at discharge, shorter length-of-stay, and reduced rates of readmission within 30 days. • A randomized trial is needed to verify these findings.