1 / 18

Content

Describing sub-national SDIs François Salgé member of EUROGI Executive Committee member of AFIGéO Executive Committee. 1. Content. Methodology for describing SDI ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs Reporting results Some results from France Conclusion.

froyall
Download Presentation

Content

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Describing sub-national SDIsFrançois Salgémember of EUROGI Executive Committeemember of AFIGéO Executive Committee 1

  2. Content • Methodology for describing SDI • ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs • Reporting results • Some results from France • Conclusion

  3. eSDI-Net+ Methodology for describing SDI • Sub-national SDI identity card • SDI usage assessment • Networking people assessment • Socio-economic impact analysis • Organisational assessment • Coping with legal aspects • Technical functionalities-facilities-components • Geoportal assessment 15 questions 14 questions 10 questions 9 questions 12 questions 6 questions 28 questions 12 questions More? See: Methodology for describing sub-national SDI, eSDI-Net+ eSDI-Net+ consortium documentation

  4. Procedure used in identifying and analysing sub-national best practices Identfication of existing sub national SDIs Preselection of promising SDI solutions Personal interwies with SDIs managers Analysis of the SDI solution based on me'thodology National worshops

  5. National workshops • France • Italy • South-East Europe • Hungary • Czech republic and Slovakia • Germany and Switzerland • Scandinavia • Poland • Romenia • UK and Ireland • Portugal and Spain • Belgium and the Netherlands

  6. ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs: AFIGéO way‏ • Phase 1: initialisation [summer 2008] • Database development • Populating database with desktop information • Phase 2: interviews of sub-national SDI officers [Sept-Dec 2008] • Filled-in form sent to interviewed person • Phone discussion (at least once for 2 hours)‏ • Written summary sent for approval • Update Database and finalise form • Phase 3: cross analysis [Dec 2008-January 2009] • Analysis of each question • Slide-show for each of the 8 categories defined in the methodology • Phase 4: synthesis [Feb 2009]

  7. ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs : Cross analysis (2/3)‏ • Step 1: preparation • Creation of a database populated by the forms • Step 2: analysis • For each question • Identification of similarities and differences between answers • Typify answers • Creation of pie charts or histograms or "shopping lists" • Realisation of a slide show for each category

  8. ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs (3/3)‏ • Identification of the questions for which the answers • provide a list of possible items as a “shopping list” for Sub-national SDI • or can be ordered from “low-level” to “high level” • or are of importance for a European synthesis • For each of the categories 2 to 7 • 1 paragraph description of main findings for each question that are of importance for a European view • For each question for which the answers can be ordered • Assign a quote for each sub-national SDI • Assign a weight • Compute a final quote for further use in the radar-chart • Provision of reaction to the process from interviewed people

  9. Reporting results (1/2)‏ • Raw material • Verbatim of interviews (database and forms) 400 pages • Spreadsheet populated by form answers • Spreadsheets for question analysis (100 sheets)‏ • Deliverables • Slide-show for each category (100 pages)‏ • Cross-analysis (per methodology topics) 40 pages +charts • Summary (in French and English) 10 pages + charts

  10. Reporting results (2/2)‏ • Sub-NSDI typology and progress characterisation • Progress of data sharing (reference data, thematic data)‏ • Openness towards stakeholders • Legal backing (legal structure and funding)‏ • Possible "trajectories" as time is concerned: • Are Sub-NSDI following the same setting up process?

  11. Some results from France: Verbatim of interviews

  12. Some results: database

  13. Some results:Slide-show for each category

  14. Some results: Cross-analysis(1/3)‏

  15. Some results from France: Cross-analysis(2/3)‏

  16. 32 indicators 6 7 7 4 8 Quantitative Qualitative Some results: Evaluation criteria(3/3)‏ • Five main criteria • SDI « size » (quantity) • SDI « quality » (meeting user requirements)‏ • Co-operation and subsidiarity • Sustainability • Users usability

  17. Conclusion: return on investmment • Knowledge • Database and fact sheet • Building the network of SDI people • National GI association identified as “network entry point” • In own country • At European level and in other European countries • EUROGI members benefited from EUROGI involvement in the project • Best practice award

  18. Best practice award

More Related