1 / 20

The Fannie Mae Derivatives Reporting Debacle A Case Study in FAS 133 Pitfalls

Return to Risk Limited Website at www.RiskLimited.com. The Fannie Mae Derivatives Reporting Debacle A Case Study in FAS 133 Pitfalls. December 2004. Overview. Background on Fannie Mae What Happened? Magnitude of the Disaster FAS 133 Rules & Revisions Major Pitfalls Shortcut Method

fuller
Download Presentation

The Fannie Mae Derivatives Reporting Debacle A Case Study in FAS 133 Pitfalls

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Return to Risk LimitedWebsite atwww.RiskLimited.com The Fannie Mae Derivatives Reporting DebacleA Case Study in FAS 133 Pitfalls December 2004

  2. Overview • Background on Fannie Mae • What Happened? • Magnitude of the Disaster • FAS 133 Rules & Revisions • Major Pitfalls • Shortcut Method • Observations & Conclusions

  3. Who Is Fannie Mae? • Fannie Mae Is The Giant Housing-Finance Company • A private, shareholder-owned company whose stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange • Not a government entity now

  4. Who Is Fannie Mae? • Created by Congress in 1938 operating under Federal control • Privatized by legislation enacted in 1968 and became fully private in 1970 • Operates under a federal charter, called the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act • Mission is to increase liquidity in the residential mortgage finance market and promote access to mortgage credit • Second largest U.S. corporation, in terms of assets • Since 1968, provided 63 million homeowners with more than $6.3 trillion in housing finance

  5. What Was Fannie Mae’s Derivatives Reporting Debacle? • It Is Alleged That Fannie Mae Incorrectly Reported The Financial Results On Their Derivative Instruments Used For Interest Rate Hedging • Incorrect FAS 133 Application • Alleged Abuse Of Accounting ‘Shortcut’ Method • The Magnitude Of Earnings Affect Is Staggering

  6. What Was Fannie Mae’s Derivatives Reporting Debacle? • 12/15/04 findings by SEC’s chief accountant that Fannie Mae should correct its earnings for the past several years • Such a restatement would wipe out $9 billion in earnings; 38 percent of FM’s profit since FAS 133 went into effect • Bigger than the restatement that lead to the Enron collapse • FM’s regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, in a September 2004 report accused the company of pervasive accounting violations

  7. Outcome of Fannie Mae’s Derivatives Reporting Debacle • At the urging of the regulator and due to the response after the Congressional hearing on FM’s 133 problem, the CEO and CFO of Fannie Mae have been forced to resign • It appears likely that Fannie Mae will have to comply with the SEC findings and restate all prior years earnings since they began FAS 133 reporting

  8. FAS 133 Overview • FAS 133 passed by FASB in June 1998 • Effective for fiscal years beginning after 6/99 • Controversial rule. Considered since the early 1990’s • Exposure draft provisions differed from final Statement, but considerable opposition

  9. Evolution of the Rules • FAS 133 Rules Have Not Remained Static • Continual Evolution With Adoption By The Financial Accounting Standards Board of... • FAS 138 and FAS 149 • Various Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Rules • Various Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Rules

  10. Evolution of the Rules • FAS 149 • Address apparent conflicts between certain DIG Issues and the technical definition of a derivative • Clarify “smaller initial net investment” • Application of ‘Shortcut’ Method • Potential changes to DIG Issue C15 • Effective for transactions after June 30, 2003

  11. Evolution of the Rules • EITF 98-10 & EITF 02-03 • EITF 98-10, “Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities” • First discussed May 1998 • Intended to give guidance on Gross vs. Net Presentation in Income Statement • EITF 02-03, “Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities” • First discussed June 2002 • Rescinds EITF 98-10 • Net Presentation of Trading Activity • 10/02 consensus effective • New contracts and inventory purchases after 10/25/02 • Old contracts periods beginning after 12/15/02

  12. Evolution of the Rules • DIG Issue C20 – “Scope Exceptions:  Interpretation of Clearly and Closely Related in Contracts That Qualify for the Normal Purchases and Normal Sales Exception” • EITF reconsidered issue and released tentative guidance • Certain new circumstances where use of CPI index would result in transaction qualifying for scope exception • Percentage change in index must be within 80 – 120 percentage of the percentage change in the fair value of the electricity being sold under the contract

  13. The Shortcut Method • The Provision That Has Gotten Fannie Mae Into Trouble • What Is It? And When Can It Be Used? • Very Narrowly Applied • Under Certain Stringent Conditions, Can Simply Assume That Hedges Remain Perfectly Effective • Avoids The Extensive Documentation & Quarterly Testing, And Still Excludes Gains Or Losses From Earnings • Zero-Value Initially For The Derivative When Designated As A Hedge • Issue For Re-application Or Restructuring Of Hedges

  14. The Shortcut Method • Fannie Mae's auditor, KPMG LLP, flagged FM's use of the Shortcut Method as a “Difference” and point of concern • But FM estimated that the accounting effect of using the Shortcut instead of the traditional long-haul method would be "minor" and "immaterial” • Impact on FM earnings appears now to be within the range of the potential $9 billion restatement demanded by the SEC

  15. Observations from the Fannie Mae Debacle • Obtaining Hedge Accounting Was Fannie Mae’s Objective • Which Would Likely Have Reflected Economic Reality • At Least Portions Of Transaction Portfolio Could Likely Have Qualified For Hedge Accounting, If Full Long-Haul Rules Had Been Carefully Followed

  16. Observations from the Fannie Mae Debacle • Fannie Mae Apparently Was Motivated Partly By The Objective Of Avoiding The Infrastructure Cost Of FAS 133 Compliance Through Full Requirements Of Hedge Rules • Creation of Systems, Documentation, Quarterly Effectiveness Testing • Illustrates The Complexity And Effort Required For Ongoing FAS 133 Compliance • Challenge For Both Big And Small Organizations

  17. Conclusions from the Fannie Mae Debacle • Rules Are Rules - FAS 133 Included • In The Post-Enron World, Caution Is In Order When It Comes To Financial Reporting & Disclosure • Especially, For Derivatives • Economic Reality Argument Doesn’t Change Accounting Requirements Or Application

  18. Conclusions from the Fannie Mae Debacle • FAS 133 Rules Have Continually Evolved • Subsequent Issue Of FAS 138 & FAS 149 • DIG & EITF • Complex Set Of Rules • However, FM Doesn’t Seem To Now Argue That They Did Not Understand the 133 Rules • Just Decided Not To Apply Them Since A ‘Gray Zone’ • According To CEO In Congressional Testimony, The Disputed Rules Involve Complex Decisions About Which Experts Often Disagree

  19. Conclusions from the Fannie Mae Debacle • FM Debacle Has Prompted Review & Vetting Of FAS 133 Application At Many Companies • Documentation For Designated Hedges • Quarterly Hedge Effectiveness Testing • Risk Control Systems • Evolution Of The 133 Rules Creates Both Opportunities And Risks

More Related