120 likes | 239 Views
Evolution of the. Reionization @ Ringberg 25.03.2009. He-ionizing background. Keri Dixon University of California, Los Angeles Steven Furlanetto. Looking for the photoionization rate. Assume background ionization flux:. The attenuation length R 0 is treated as an unknown.
E N D
Evolution of the Reionization @ Ringberg 25.03.2009 He-ionizing background Keri Dixon University of California, Los Angeles Steven Furlanetto
Looking for the photoionization rate Assume background ionization flux: The attenuation length R0 is treated as an unknown. When convenient, choose Bolton et al. 2006 The emissivity en is also uncertain.
Begin with tHe II HE 2347-4342:Zheng et al. 2004, Shull et al. 2004, Kriss et al. 2001 HS 1700+64: Fechner et al. 2006, Davidsen et al. 1996 Q0302-003: Heap et al. 2000, Hogan et al. 1997 HS 1157+3143: Reimers et al. 2005 PKS 1935-692: Anderson et al. 1996
From teff to G Start with the Gunn-Peterson optical depth Balance photoionization and recombination for HeII Introduce the fractional density of the IGM (D) with p(D) Miralda-Escudé et al. 2000 Assume isothermal equation of state
Fluctuating vs. Uniform Helium reionization driven by quasarsfluctuating G Uniform ~ R0 = ∞ The attenuation length and ionized fraction affect distribution. Furlanetto 08
Evolution of G Choose convenient R0 Pin to curve at z = 2.45 Significant departure from curve z ~ 2.75 (?) Uncertain (mainly) due to limited lines of sight
Evolution of R0 Choose convenient G Pin to curve at z = 2.45 Significant jump z ~ 2.75 (?) Fluctuating background smoothes evolution
What do we see? Choose convenient R0 Assume convenient G Find expected teff Data could distinguish the three regimes
Time for lunch…just kidding It seems like probably something is happening around z ~ 2.75 Possible conclusions: Reionization is happening near this redshift This “something” does not indicate reionization The model is an insufficient approximation