1 / 15

Geometrical constraints to the T9 beam photon tag Set-up

Geometrical constraints to the T9 beam photon tag Set-up. Nicola Mazziotta INFN Bari mazziotta@ba.infn.it May 17, 2006. Photon tag set-up. The center of the two SSDs upstream the magnet is assumed to be coincident with the beam axis.

gabriel-barry
Download Presentation

Geometrical constraints to the T9 beam photon tag Set-up

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geometrical constraints to the T9 beam photon tag Set-up Nicola Mazziotta INFN Bari mazziotta@ba.infn.it May 17, 2006

  2. Photon tag set-up The center of the two SSDs upstream the magnet is assumed to be coincident with the beam axis The two SSDs downstream the magnet are assumed to be shifted with respect to the beam axis in order to provide a larger acceptance for the deflected electrons The distances between the two pairs of upstream (downstream) SSDs are set to 50 cm Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  3. Displacement Vs. Photon momentum l Deflected electron p*e(GeV/c)> 0.3 B(T) l(m) D Electron displacement, δ Input pe B field region p = pe - p*e Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  4. Photon momentum Vs. Angle Photon momentum resolution /p = (dp /dθ) θ/p Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  5. Angular resolution • SSD resolution = Strip pitch/sqrt(12) = 228 micron/sqrt(12) • the uncertainty on the electron position depends on the SSD pitch • Beam divergence = 1 mrad • the trajectories in B field depend of the input angle • Beam momentum resolution = 2% • the deflected angle depends on the electron momentum • Multiple scattering in the SSDs • multiple scattering can cause fluctuations of the input angle of the electron in the B-field region • the multiple scattering angle decreases (increases) with the deflected electron momentum (photon momentum) Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  6. Angular resolution: fast MC result (preliminary) A fast MC has been implemented that takes into account the effects discussed above Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  7. Photon momentum resolution Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  8. Summary • Given an angular range, several photon momenta can be observed, by properly setting the magnetic field and the input electron momentum • The photon momentum resolution depends on the input electron momentum, on the magnetic field and on the angular resolution, it worsens with decreasing photon momentum. • Bremsstrahlung production angle, that has not been taken into account, could worsen the momentum resolution • Eventual bremsstrahlung photons generated after the magnet, have not been taken into account. Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  9. Bending power calibration procedure • Set beam momentum (i.e. pin=3 GeV/c) and B field value • Alignment run with B=0 using pions (SSDs have to be disposed along the beam axis in order to perform proper alignment) • Look for the beam optics magnets current settings that allow to obtain normal incidence on SSDs • Evaluate the relative SSD strip positions • Calibration runs with B>0 using pions with different momenta (number of runs and momentum values TBD) up to pin • Set the beam magnet currents to have normal incidence on SSDs • Study the pion deflection angle as a function of momentum • For pin=1 GeV/c lower beam momenta could be not available (maybe the beam momentum can be decreased up to 0.5 GeV/c). Calibration data at higher momenta can be used, taking into account that angular deflection depends on B/p. Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  10. Photon test beam set-up and trigger EM Cal Beam: electron/positron SSDs SV 2 SSDs (1%X0) S2 S4 C2 (3%X0) GLAST CU S3 C1(3%X0) Sh S1 (2.5%X0) TRIG = S1 S2 S4 Sh C1 C2 S3 Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  11. Bari SSD modules 6 X-Y wafer module: 1 module is equipped with two MICRON SSDs 400 m thick and 228 m strip pitch, each with three TA1 chips (384 strips) 1 module is equipped with two ST SSDs 500 m thick and 228 m strip pitch, each with three TA1 chips (384 strips) 2+1 modules are equipped with two GLAST SSDs 400 m thick and 228 m strip pitch, each with three TA1 chips (384 strips) 1 module is equipped with two GLAST SSDs 400 m thick and 228 m strip pitch, each with three VA1 chips (384 strips) The two wafers are read-out in chain to have 768 strips in a single FADC channel. The items in red will be delivered to Bari later this week. Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  12. Bari SSD modules 3 TA1 IDEAS chips Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  13. Bari SSD ladder box Ladder module: 1 GLAST ladder equipped with three TAI chips, and 4 GLAST wafer each equipped with 3 VA1 chips. The wafer strips are oriented orthogonal to the ladder strips. The wafers are located on both surfaces of the box. Two wafers are read-out in chain to have 768 strips in a single FADC channel. The ladder (384 strips) is read-out in a different FADC channel. The ladder will be delivered to Bari later this week. Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  14. INFN Bari plastic scintillator • 2 fingers of 1x6 cm2, 1 cm thick (upstream trigger) • 1 of 10x10 cm2, 1 cm thick (upstream beam monitor) • 1 of 15x30 cm2, 1 cm thick (downstream trigger) • 2 of 15x50 cm2, 1 cm thick (downstream VETO) • 1 of 15x40 cm2, 1 cm thick with hole in the middle (halo VETO) • The scintillators are equipped with XP2020 photo-multiplier and mu-metal shielding Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

  15. Set up … Nicola Mazziotta, May 17 2006

More Related