1 / 15

Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language

Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language. Michael T. Ullman, Ivy V. Estabrooke, Karsten Steinhauer, Claudia Brovetto. Language Processing. Language Processing depends on 2 neurocognitive systems Temporal-lobe based declarative memory system Includes…

Download Presentation

Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language Michael T. Ullman, Ivy V. Estabrooke, Karsten Steinhauer, Claudia Brovetto

  2. Language Processing • Language Processing depends on 2 neurocognitive systems • Temporal-lobe based declarative memory system • Includes… • Mental lexicon, which contains idiosyncratic word-specific information • E.g. for irregular past tense; break-broke • Frontal/basal-ganglia procedural system • Includes… • Mental grammar underlying the real-time rule-based composition of complex linguistic representation • E.g. regular past tenses; play + ed • Also used in motor skills

  3. Females are better than males at remembering words • Females tend to memorize previously encountered complex representations • E.g. regular past-tenses; played • Males generally compose it on-line • E.g. play + -ed

  4. Prediction… • Both sexes should memorize idiosyncratic lexical knowledge • E.g. break-broke • Both should rule compute new complex forms • E.g. proy-ed • Why? • Because these could not be memorized

  5. Previous studies • Frequency Effects • Hypothesis: if past-tense representations are retrieved from memory, more frequent ones should be remembered faster. If they are rule products, such past-tense frequency effects are not expected • 16 men and 17 women produced regular/irregular past tenses • DV: reaction-time • Men showed past tense frequency effects for irregulars but not regulars • Women showed past tense frequency effects for both verb types • Same results for both English and Spanish

  6. Parkinson’s Disease • Associated with the Basal-ganglia degeneration leading to hypokinesia (suppressed movement) • Study: 15 men and 14 women with Parkinson’s disease produced past tenses • For men, past-tense production rates of regulars but not irregulars correlated with hypokinesia and production rates for irregulars but not regulars correlated with lexical abilities (object naming) • For women, production rate for both past-tense types correlated with lexical abilities but not hypokinesia • Most hypokinetic males were impaired only at regulars • Most hypokinetic women were impaired at neither

  7. The Effect of Sex Hormones on Language ProcessingIvy V. Estabrooke, Kristen Mordecai, Pauline Maki, and Michale T. Ullman • As stated before, women are better than men at remembering words • This advantage appears to depend upon the temporal-lobe declarative memory system • Hypothesis: Because of women’s superior lexical/declarative memory ability, girls and women may tend to memorize and/or retrieve at least certain complex representations that men composed on-line

  8. From this, two questions arise • 1. Do females memorize complex forms at a higher rate than males and/or do both sexes store tense forms, while females have superior lexical retrieval/processing abilities • 2. Do sex hormones, and estrogen in particular, contribute to the sex differences? • Previous data supports this hypothesis • Estrogen improves word and declarative memory abilities in women; more over, this improvement depends on the part of the temporal lobe that underlies declarative memory • Furthermore, testosterone improves men’s word memory

  9. Methods • 10 post-menopausal women and 12 age-matched men participate in study of the effects of hormone therapy on language processing • Subjects were given hormone replacement therapy • Women-estrogen, Men-testosterone, and placebo group • After each three months, subjects were given past-tense production task containing… • Regular (sway-swayed) , irregular (break-broke), novel regular (plag-plagged) and novel irregular (spling-splung) • Verbs were presented in sentence contexts • E.g. Every day I sleep in bed. Yesterday, I ________ in bed. • Accuracy was the DV

  10. Results • Hormone therapy yielded increased estrogen levels in both sexes • It also induced an increase in both sexes in the production rate of real and novel irregular past tenses • Performance at novel regulars decreased with hormone therapy in both sexes • Likely due to an increased irregularizations (plag-plog) • Accuracy at real regulars INCREASED in women but DECREASED in men, as a result of hormone therapy

  11. Accuracy at Past Tense Production

  12. Analysis • Increase in both women and men in production rate of real/novel irregular past-tense forms suggests that sex hormones improve the retrieval/processing of existing memorized lexical representations • And of novel forms whose processing depends on preexisting similar memory traces • E.g. fling-flung, wring-wrung

  13. The decrease in performance of novel regulars with hormone therapy in both sexes.. • Supports view that these forms are computed by neural mechanisms distinct from those that underlie the processing of real and novel irregulars • It also supports the dual-system “declarative/procedural model”

  14. The fact that hormone therapy led to an increase in the production rate of regular past-tenses in women, but a decrease in men shows that in women these forms patttern with the mempry-dependent irregulars and in men, they pattern with the compositional novel regulars

  15. Conclusion • The sex differences just observed may be attributable to the prior memorization of complex forms by girls • This may be explained by sex-differences in estrogen levels, which could affect brain organization in utero and or learning during childhood

More Related