370 likes | 388 Views
Explore the impact of sex stereotypes, biases, and socialization on individuals. Discover the origins of stereotypes from home, school, peers, and media. Delve into actual sex differences in physical, cognitive, and behavioral aspects. Learn about sex typing, gender roles, and behaviors. Dive into theories of sex role development from psychoanalytic to cognitive perspectives.
E N D
Chapter 13 – Sex Differences • Sex Stereotypes = general beliefs based on sex Masculine stereotype - Instrumental behavior - the active provider
Feminine stereotype - Expressive behavior - the nurturer
Maintenance of stereotypes2 biases • Confirmatory bias Note examples of stereotype & view as proof • Selective inattention Inconsistencies ignored/explained
Sex stereotypes are schemas that organize our thinking • Can distort thinking & memory - easy to remember confirming examples - hard to remember contradictory ones
Impact of stereotypes • Evaluate people more positively if consistent with stereotype • Evaluate harshly if violate stereotype
Men seen as able, women as giving effort for same male-typed achievement • Women still earn less for same job
Origins of Stereotypes • Home - parents treat kids differently from birth
School: Teachers respond differentially - boys: success = ability failure = lack of effort - girls: success = effort & neatness failure = lack of ability
Peers - children intolerant of sex-inconsistent behavior • Media - extremes of sex-typed behavior - more sex-typed than real life - children’s programming is the most sex-typed
Cross-cultural results 110 non-industrialized societies consistent effects of sex stereotyping in socialization
% Societies where pressure greater AttributeFor BoysFor Girls Nurturance 0 82 Obedience 3 35 Responsibility 11 61 Achievement 87 3 Self-reliance 85 0
First goal is for all children to behave • Second goal is to socialize child to conform to sex stereotype
Actual Sex Differences • Physical differences - Sex characteristics - Size, strength
Abilities • Verbal abilities - girls
Math abilities - girls in elementary school - boys during adolescence • Visual-spatial abilities - boys
Psychological/Behavioral Differences • Aggression - boys • Activity Level - boys
Fear, timidity, & (lower) risk-taking - girls • Developmental vulnerability - boys
Emotional sensitivity & nurturance - girls & boys • Compliance - girls
Nature & size of the group differences - large overlap between groups - differences are consistent but small - differences smaller than 20 years ago - almost all differences are qualified - individual variability
Reasons for differences - innate, biological differences - socialization
Sum: differences exist • BUT sexes are more alike than different - more unlike individuals of own sex than average member of other sex - cannot make predictions about individuals
Sex TypingIdentification with own sex • Gender/sex identity - knowledge of one’s sex and its permanence
Initially categorize on superficial characteristics • By age 3 categorize self accurately - but do not realize sex is permanent • By 5-7 know sex is unchanging & have stable identity based on sex
Sex/gender roles - beliefs about what the sexes are supposed to be like & do Knowledge • by 2.5, some • by 10, complete
Adherence to stereotypes • in preschool, some flexibility • by 6, no deviation allowed • by 10, more flexible again • 12-15 = intolerance • young adults = more flexible • middle age = less sex-typed
Transition times = more rigid => more rigid at times when sex identification is more relevant
Sex-Typed Behavior Favor activities typed for own sex • By 14-22 months, prefer sex-typed toys • 18-24 mo = no opposite-sex toys • By 2 years for girls & 3 for boys, prefer same-sex playmates • Maccoby & children’s play styles
Sex differences - boys adopt sex-typed behavior & preferences quicker - girls more likely to retain cross-sex interests • Boys = more pressure to conform
Stability of sex-typing - fairly stable from childhood to adulthood - but some flexibility
Theories of Sex Role Development • Psychoanalytic Theory (Freud) - social & biological factors - everyone is bisexual at birth - sexual identity = identification with same-sex parent
Biosocial Theory (Money & Ehrhardt) - biology channels development - via child’s & others’ reactions
Social Learning Theory (Bandura, Mischel) - parents influence sex development by: 1. direct instruction - reinforcement & punishment - encourage sex-typed behavior by age 2 - dads/peers
2. observational learning - imitate same-sex models - reinforced for this imitation BUT - doesn’t address children’s own motivation
Cognitive-Developmental Theory (Kohlberg) - sex-role development depends on cognitive development - children actively socialize themselves - 1st establish stable gender identity - then seek models & information
- Role of developing cognitive abilities & child’s motivation - encourage sex-role development at 6+ years - BUT children show sex-typed behavior before they have stable identity
Gender-Schema Theory — cognitive(Martin & Halverson) - children motivated to be consistent - self-socialize as soon as have basic gender identity (age 2-3) - role of gender schemas
Integration - biosocial, social learning & cognitive • Biosocial - biology leads people to label children by sex & treat differentially • Social learning - early (0-3) sex-typing from others’ teaching & encouragement • Cognitive - cognitive milestones & child’s own desires aid sex-typing (age 2-3+)