470 likes | 730 Views
Language, its development and pathologies. Isabelle Rapin Pediatric Neurology Seminar, Dec. 4, 2013 No conflict of interest . Tools to investigate brain basis of behavior. Behavioral observation, neuropsychology Brain lesions, diseases Inhibitory rTMS (transient virtual focal lesions)
E N D
Language, its development and pathologies Isabelle Rapin Pediatric Neurology Seminar, Dec. 4, 2013 No conflict of interest
Tools to investigate brain basis of behavior • Behavioral observation, neuropsychology • Brain lesions, diseases • Inhibitory rTMS (transient virtual focal lesions) • Histology (incl. focal gene expression) • Structural imaging: CT, MRI, DTI (connectivity) • Metabolism: PET (glucose, metabolites, transmitters) • ↑ blood flow during task : fMRI (BOLD) • Electrophysiology: EEG, ERP • Magnetoencephalography
Some advantages/drawbacks of these tools • All: group data, comparisons, baseline problem • Electrophysiology/MEG: real time data • EEG/ERP: good time, poor spatial resolution • MEG: realtime, subcortical data, expensive and not widely available • fMRI: reasonable spatial but not time resolution. Most require cooperative subj., but advantage of clever experiments. • PET: radiation, etc.
What is language? • In the individual: A computational system between thought and an acoustic signal (Hickok, 2006) • Among people: A shared medium to transmit information
Oral – speech Written – reading, writing Gestural – Sign Somatosensory - Braille Mathematical notation Chemical, genetic symbols, etc. Musical notation Dance notation Blue prints Etc., etc. Multiple language modalities(all: sensory → code/grammar → motor)
Levels of language • Phonology - sound units of language • Grammar/syntax - word order, word markers [morphemes], grammatical [closed class] words • Semantics - interface of (known) words – lexicon - to meaning • Pragmatics - communicative intent, verbal, non-verbal (prosody, gestures)
Steps in language processing Input Output (sensory) (motor) Decoding Higher order Encoding processing
Steps in language processing • Input: sound to language (phonetics) • Decoding input: phonological form + lexical/semantic information • Comprehension/programming: grammar, sentence. Working verbal memory, executive skills, attention… • Programming output: lexical item + phonological form • Output: motor, i.e., speech, other language modalities
Classic view: Language connectivity: left hemisphere Peoppel et al., 2012
Current view of language in the left hemisphere Dorsal stream Map sound to articulation Dorsal stream Ventral stream Map sound to meaning Gow 2012
Language Processing Circuitry • Primary auditory cortex (Heschel gyrus) ↔ • Post. sup. temporal gyrus/sulc. (Wernicke) • Ventral lexicon (post. middle temp. gyr. ↔ temporal pole (semantic hub) • Ventral stream↔ inf. frontal (Broca) • Dorsal lexicon (inf. parietal, supramargin. gyr.) • Dorsal stream↔ premotor cortex and↔ Broca (phonological loop, rehearsal – work. memory)
Schematic of language processing:current view 4. 3.. 1 2. 5. 3. 4. Hickok 2009
Functional language processing:dorsal and ventral streams A ATI Ant.temporal lobe PM Premotor cortex BA Broca area SMG Supramarginal gyrus AUD Auditory cortex Spt Syvian parietal (Left only MTG/ITG Middle/inferior temporal gyrus STG Superior temporal gyrus Hickok 2009
Interhemispheric language processing • Audition –sound → phonetic: bilateral • Dorsal pathway -- phoneme and articulation: left • Ventral pathway – map sound to meaning: left >> right • Map words to thoughts (syntax, sentence): bilateral distributed network • Map communicative intent (pragmatics): right
Lateralization of phonologic tasks(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Left Right Vigneau et al., 2011
Lateralization of lexical semantic tasks(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Left Right Vigneau et al., 2011
Lateralization of syntax, sentences(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Vigneau et al., 2011
Interfaces of language with short term/working memory • Auditory buffer (aud. assoc. cortex) ↔ • Prefrontal cortex ↔ perirhinal cortex, hippocampus ↔ temporal cortex (working memory + episodic-semantic memory) (ventral stream + fornix & mammillo/ thalamic cingulate connections) • Ventral interconnects dorsal stream (articul.) Child & Benarroch, Neurology Nov. 19, 2013 Battaglia et al., Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012
Hearing is present in utero Cochlea is full size by the end of the second trimester Infant hears in utero, e.g., mother’s heart beat, borborygmi, voice Hearing acuity good and testable at birth, matures during the first year Latency of obligatory auditory ERPs decreases with maturation
Sequence of language development • Phonology: at birth, function of language exposure → bilingual advantage • Pragmatics: at birth • Semantics: starts at ~6 months • Syntax: by ~ 2 years • Reading: starts at preschool
Stages of language development • Neonate – hears speech sounds relevant to all languages, hones the ones heard, loses others • ~ 1 year -- Single word holophrastic utterances • ~ 18-24 mos. – start of 2 word utterances, mostly rote echoes • ~ 24-30 mos. – 2 word utterances increase, become individualized, start of grammatic rules • ~ 3-4 years – sentences of increasing complexity • Fully mature syntax -- → ~age 10 yrs or more
Semantic development Infants develop awareness of permanence in the face of transformation (sounds, moving faces, objects, movements, own body parts) Infants associate speech sounds with permanent stimuli By 1 year: they understand some words, point to say “gimme” or “look”, may have a few meaningful words
Syntactic development Starts at the 2 word stage, usually around 2 years Two word stage usually starts when toddler has some 50 words in lexicon Sentences with articles, pronouns, and, later, morphologic markers, usually established by 3 years Very complex syntax not achieved until well into the school years
Are late talking toddlers at risk for specific language impairment? Courtesy: D. Thal
Normal Variability Number of words produced in relation to number of words understood by 12- to 16-month-old children at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories Number of words produced Number of words understood
Variability in normal development Range of word produced by typically-developing girls on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (Fenson, Dale, Reznick, Thal, Bates, Hartung, Pethick, & Reilly, 1993)
When to worry (1) Questionable hearing at any age, including at birth, refer to audiology No reciprocal eye gaze/dialog at any age No pointing by 1 year No comprehension of speech ≥1 year No turning when called by name ≥15 months < 10 words at 18 mos No 2 word phrases at ≥2 years
When to worry (2) Unintelligible to parents at 2 years Unintelligible to strangers at 3 years Language not communicative, e.g., talks to no one in particular Abnormal features of speech: echolalia, scripts, pedantic vocabulary, aberrant prosody (e.g., robotic, singsong), selective mutism Any loss of language milestones (including communicative gestures)
Useful clinical language tools • MacArthur Development Communicative Inventories. L. Fensonet al. Paul Brookes, 1993 • For kids < 30 months. Infant and verbal toddler versions • Parents collect the data on comprehension, production and use • Extremely well standardized in multiple languages • Early Language Milestone Scale. J. Coplan, Pro-Ed 1987, ELM-2 2012 • For kids < 3 years. Scored by observer. Quick • Format similar to the Denver • ELM-2: also for older DLD kids, , uses a kit
DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDERS (DLDs)a.k.a.SPECIFIC LANGUAGE DISORDERS (SLIs)or DYSPHASIAS
Differential diagnosis of inadequate language development Hearing loss Specific language disorder (dysphasia) Intellectual deficiency Autism Selective mutism (recording of normal speech required!
2 types of information the child neurologist needs to make a specific behavioral language diagnosis The familiar input – processing – output brain pathway Levels of language encoding
Steps in language processing Input Output (sensory) (motor) Decoding Higher order Encoding processing
Levels of language encoding (1) • Phonology – speech sounds • phonetics – segmental • prosody – suprasegmental • Grammar • syntax (word order) • morphology (word endings, etc.)
Levels of language encoding (2) • Semantics – meaning of utterances • lexicon – word dictionary in brain • meaning of connected speech • Pragmatics – conversational language • verbal – turn taking, referencing, etc. • nonverbal – facial expression, gestures, body posture, prosody
Associated deficits (frequent!) • Oromotor deficits (pseudobulbar palsy, etc.): • frequent in dysfluent children with verbal dyspraxia and those with mixed receptive/expressive disorders • but do not “cause” the language disorder • Intellectual deficiency: • does not cause specific language disorders • Autism: • intellectual deficiency & lack of drive to communicate = inadequate explanations for the language disorder • Selective mutism: • must have recording of allegedly “normal” speech at home
Types of dysphasia • “Pure” expressive(comprehension OK, pragmatics OK, affects only phonology ± syntax) • fluent but phonology very impaired (phonologic programming -- PP) • dysfluent or mute (verbal dyspraxia -- VD) • Mixed expressive/receptive(affect phonology + syntax + semantics ± pragmatics) • comprehension ≥ expression (phonologic-syntactic or MER) • no comprehension = verbal auditory agnosia (verbal auditory agnosia VAA) • Higher order processing(semantics ± pragmatics) • word finding deficit dysfluent, immature syntax(lexical syntactic -- LS) • fluent, verbose, comprehend less than they can say, use scripts. Most often in Asperger-type children (semantic pragmatic --SP)
DLD proposed syndromes • SP semantic/pragmatic • LS lexical syntactic • PP phonologic programming • VD verbal dyspraxia • MER/PS mixed expressive receptive or phonologic syntactic • VAA verbal auditory agnosia
Standard Work-up of DLD Preschooler • Physical/neurologic evaluation: syndrome? • Family history • Formal hearing evaluation unless phonology is 100% OK • Rarely need for EEG, imaging, genetics (several genes now known) unless for research • Refer to speech pathology (and psychology) • Refer to preschool (more effective than speech Rx alone) • Follow-up needed: most speak but later problems likely (see Rutter 1881, Aram, 1984 Beichtman 1996, etc.)
Gender Not ethnicity Bilingual exposure? Family income Parental education Ear infections . First degree relatives with history of Learning/reading disability Speech or language disorders Neurological disorders Use of gestures # of words understood # of words produced Potential Outcome Predictors inDevelopmental Language Disorders
Course of language development in DLD/SLI • Classification is not stable • More children move out of or into the category than remain in it between 3 an 5 years of age (Silva) • Children with delays in comprehension and production are at greater risk for continued “delay” than those with normal comprehension (Bishop, Silva, Tallal) • Younger children at start of intervention tend to have a better prognosis (Bishop, Silva, Tallal) Donna J. Thal Ph.D.
Course of development in DLD 5 ½ y. DLD with normal language scores: likely to remain in the normal range on such tests (Bishop) However, lower phonological processing scores likely half read below age level, at 15 years of age (Stothard et al., 1998)