1 / 3

Naming Key Issues – List of Naming conventions in use

Naming Key Issues – List of Naming conventions in use. QAC Naming Conventions Sub-committee Meeting n.2. S. Knoops QAC TE(-CRG) representative – GCO CRG. Some other key-Issues.

gad
Download Presentation

Naming Key Issues – List of Naming conventions in use

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Naming Key Issues – List of Naming conventions in use QAC Naming Conventions Sub-committee Meeting n.2 S. Knoops QAC TE(-CRG) representative – GCO CRG

  2. Someother key-Issues As seen in last meeting for the electrical cabinets, 2 positions were created in INFOR EAM for the same equipment (one by EN/EL and one by CRG) as the naming was not “compatible” -> a solution has been found and update of database is ongoing. We also have the creation of 2 assets in the INFOR database for the same equipment: one by CRG (e.gHCDFBAM701-CR000001) and one by HSE for the pressure “vessels”: CRPEMS-00250 in order to be able to create the inspection report with their program SAILOR. -> temporary solution has been found, as long as they are not modifying the SAILOR program: the document EDMS will be attached by hand by CRG to the right asset. But the CRPEMS asset is still existing (otherwise the report cannot be created). We do not have this problem for safety valves CRPSV-xxxxx as we decided to attach these assets to our functional positions Q%SV% for all our safety valves at the surface, and also for the pressure vessels CRRP-xxxxx were we did the same: we attach them to our functional positions QxD or QxV. This process was “logic” as there were no assets created at the surface. On the other hand, we have seen that some assets were created on the DFBs for safety valves and here we have decided to take the CRPSV-xxxxx and put “obsolete” the assets HC%-xxxxxxxxx. Nevertheless, HSE is having parallel databases and listings to the ones we are using for the follow-up of the 2-yearly/4-yearly inspections. This should be centralized in one database with one maintenance plan and the reporting should be “integrated” and not in an external database with only a EDMS document telling when should be the next inspection. This problem could affect SAFETY assessment and concerning methods, HSE should be involved in the discussions.

  3. List of naming conventions, used in CRG Main document CRG: EDMS 1219702: CRYOGENIC FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT NAMING CONVENTION USED IN CMMS AND OTHER DATABASES References: • LHC-PM-QA-204.01 Equipment Naming Conventions • LHC-PM-QA-206.01 LHC Part Identification • Maintenance Management Project, Concept Report, EDMS document 1173942 Has nowintergrated the following documents: • Naming Conventions for Cryogenic Instrumentation of the LHC-Machine installed in the tunnel, LHC-QI-QA-0002, EDMS document 345385 • Naming Conventions for Cryogenic Instrumentation, LHC-QI-QA-0002, EDMS document 718279 • Naming Conventions for Enclosure Systems of Cryogenic Electronics in the LHC Tunnel, LHC-QY-QA-0001, EDMS document 718317 • Equipment TAG Code System for Accelerator Cryogenics, LHC-ACR Internal Note 98-03, EDMS document 320856. • IDENTIFICATEURS POUR BASE DE DONNEES DU SYSTEME DE CONTROLE DES CRYOGENIES DES EXPERIENCES LHC, internal Note LHC/ECR 00-8, or EDMS doc. 1178084 • LHC Project Report 92

More Related