1 / 16

STATUS OF THE LHC INJECTORS UPGRADE (“LIU”) PROJECT

STATUS OF THE LHC INJECTORS UPGRADE (“LIU”) PROJECT. R. Garoby for the LIU Project Team March 6, 2012 CERN. Organization Progress in 2011 Plan for 2012 and 2013 Plan beyond LS1 Resources Open issues. Project Organization Breakdown Structure.

gada
Download Presentation

STATUS OF THE LHC INJECTORS UPGRADE (“LIU”) PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STATUS OF THELHC INJECTORS UPGRADE (“LIU”) PROJECT R. Garoby for the LIU Project Team March 6, 2012 CERN

  2. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and 2013 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Open issues

  3. Project Organization Breakdown Structure Director of Accelerators and technology - Steve Myers LIU Project team Roland Garoby (Project Leader) - Malika Meddahi (Deputy) - Brennan Goddard (LIU-SPS machine coordinator) - Simone Gilardoni (LIU-PS machine coordinator) - Klaus Hanke (LIU-PSB machine coordinator) - Maurizio Vretenar (Linac4 Project Leader)- Laurette Ponce (Project Safety Officer)-Django Manglunki (LIU-Ion chain coordinator) LIU- PS coordination team S.Gilardoni – Activity Leader H. Damerau– Deputy and Scientific secretary https://espace.cern.ch/liu-project/liu-ps/ LIU-SPS coordination team B.Goddard E.Shaposhnikova – Deputy G.Rumulo – Scientific secretary https://espace.cern.ch/liu-project/liu-sps/default.aspx LIU-Project Safety coordination L. Ponce Linac4 Project M.Vretenar http://linac4-project.web.cern.ch/linac4-project/ LIU-PSB coordination team K.Hanke – Activity leader B.Mikulec – Deputy V.Raginel – Scientific secretary https://espace.cern.ch/liu-project/liu-psb/ LIU Administrative Support: Cécile Noels. Project Support: Pierre Bonnal, Sylvain Weisz, TadeuszKurtyka - EVM coordinators: De Jonghe, Benoît Daudin

  4. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and 2013 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Additional issues

  5. Achievements in 2011 • Formal organization of the LIU project: • Nomination of additional members of the project team (Project Safety Officer and responsible for ions) • Adjustment of project scope with transfer of activities from Linac4 (H- injection the PSB and all PSB-related tasks) and Consolidation • Definition of Work Breakdown Structure, most of Work Units, budget codes and budget needs. • Scientific/technical achievements: • Analysis of injectors’ potential using MDs and simulations • Refinement of the required actions on equipment (upgrades and replacement) with reviews (e-cloud, 160 MeV injection, beam instrumentation…) • Workshop with HL-LHC project in view of converging on beam characteristics.

  6. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and LS1 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Additional issues

  7. Goals for 2012 and 2013 • Scientific/technical goals: • Analysis of injectors’ potential using MDs and simulations in view of stating the final project goals in agreement with HL-LHC at the end of 2012. • Specification of actions on equipment (upgrades and replacement) with reviews (e-cloud, …) • Publication of Design Report in 2013, • Preparation of future upgrades during LS1.5(?) and LS2. • Management goals: • EVM follow-up of the PSB upgrade. • Specification of cost to completion at the beginning of 2013. • Start of EVM follow-up of PS and SPS upgrades in 2013.

  8. Main work on the acceleratorsduring LS1 • PSB: • Construction of H- injection equipment(magnets, pulsers, vacuum chambers and valves…) • Cabling for H- injection equipment • Replacement of beam dump and crane • Preparation for new main power converter (new building) • Upgrade of beam instrumentation (new orbitmeasurement system and devices for H- injection) • New LLRF and prototype RF cavity • PS: • Radiation shielding on Road Goward and above septum 16 • Finemet-based longitudinal damper • New beam instrumentation (fastBLMs, study of IPMs) • Design/order of power converters for lowenergy correctors • SPS: • Preparation for upgrade of 200 MHz RF system • Installation of aCcoated vacuum chambers in 2-4 half-cells • Upgrade of transverse damper • Installation of wide band transverse feedback • Beaminstrumentation (BFCT upgrade, BGI development, new diamondBLMs, prototype mechanics for new wire scanner) Cabling! Cabling of fibre opticbackbone and one LSS + some coaxial cables!

  9. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and 2013 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Additional issues

  10. Overall Plan

  11. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and 2013 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Additional issues

  12. Material budget (kCHF) • Comment: planning after 2014 to be redone after the update of the LTP (dates of LS2)

  13. Staff (from APT on March 5, 2012) • Comment: amounts in 2009 and 2010 + «bump» in 2013 result from inclusion in LIU of the PSB H- injection system and of miscellaneous consolidation items.

  14. Organization • Progress in 2011 • Plan for 2012 and 2013 • Plan beyond LS1 • Resources • Additionalissues

  15. Additional issues (1/2) • Will there be an LS1.5 at ~end of 2016? • Very useful for (1) making use of the investment in Linac4, (2) reducing risk (stop of Linac2) and (3) minimizing workload and time/risks for commissioning after LS2 (staging of the upgrades) • Necessitates resources for work on the PSB during LS1 and preparation of cabling with Linac4. • Need for planning LS2: at least 12 months for hardware installation + n months for hardware and beam commissioning. => no beam from the injectors during ~18 months.

  16. Additional issues (2/2) • Letter of support to the DOE for continuation of the development by US-LARP of a wideband transverse sytem in the SPS. • Organization of publications in the Accelerator Sector • Present situation is not satisfying (no easy means to identify the publications on LIU at least) • Little progress from my side (lack of time) except for a draft proposal prepared with Malika. • Suggestion to put someone in charge from the Project Support Office for refining a proposal, proposing it to the ATSMB and following its implementation

More Related