1 / 11

Calculating sampling error

Calculating sampling error. Actually, we’ll calculate what is known (technically) as the confidence interval. This is the “+ or =” number that you hear when sample results are reported. The formula is: 1.96 √(1-f)(p)(1-p)/(n-1), where f = n/N n = sample size N = pop. size

Download Presentation

Calculating sampling error

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Calculating sampling error • Actually, we’ll calculate what is known (technically) as the confidence interval. This is the “+ or =” number that you hear when sample results are reported. • The formula is: 1.96 √(1-f)(p)(1-p)/(n-1), where f = n/N n = sample size N = pop. size p = proportion (a sample “response”)

  2. The questions were asked over a period from…. The methodology was used to select and question a representative sample of randomly selected adults. The margin of error is +/- 3 points. • This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Jan. 26-31, 2005, among a random national sample of 1,204 adults. The results have a three-point error margin.

  3. But 1-f has little effect unless n is large in comparison to N. This is unlikely when the population is large. Examples: If N = 100,000,000 and n equals 1,500, 1-f = .999985. If N = 250,000 and n = 1,500, 1-f = .994 So, unless n is (impossibly) large, or N is small, 1-f can be ignored. (When n/N is about .15 or above, then one needs to think about it.)

  4. So, now we’re left with 1.96 √(p)(1-p)/(n-1) • This is a profound result. Why?

  5. So, to repeat, we’re left with 1.96 √(p)(1-p)/(n-1) This expression is largest if p = .50. So, let’s be conservative and estimate the largest error (confidence interval) for a given sample size. I.e., let p = .50. • Doing this gives us: 1.96 √(.5)(1-.5)/(n-1) = 1.96 √.25/(n-1)

  6. But in this expression, 1.96 √.25/(n-1) we can use n instead of n-1. This gives us 1.96 √.25/(n) • Finally, since we’re approximating, we can use 2 instead of 1.96. And, to make it a percentage rather than a proportion, we can use 200 instead of 2.

  7. So, from 1.96 √.25/(n) we get 200 √.25/(n) • This is a simple, useful approximation of the confidence interval (the + or - number) for a sample of size n. • Example: • n = 500, c.i. = 4.47 (for comp., 196 √(.25)/(n-1) = 4.39)

  8. In short, to answer the question “approximately how accurate is a sample of 1000 respondents,” we simply calculate 200 √.25/(n). The answer is:3.16, or about 3.2%. • If you wish, you can do a little algebra and answer this question: If I want a c.i. of, say, ± 4%, what sample size do I need? (the answer is 625)

  9. Cautionary note: samples of, say, 1000 can represent a large population. But subgroups within that sample may be much smaller. • It’s the subgroup size that matters. • This is one reason why non-simple random samples are taken (to obtain larger subgroup sizes).

  10. Point left out • What I talked about—the ± number you hear reported—is the so-called 95% confidence interval. Suppose it’s three percent. • What this means is that you can be 95% certain that the population proportion will be within 3% of the proportion you find in the sample.

  11. Example: In a survey, you find that 45% of the sample says that they are Republican. The point is made that the sample is accurate to within ± 2.5%. • You can be confident that in the popula-tion, between 42.5% and 47.5% are Rep. (Strictly speaking, this would be correct 19 times out of 20—i.e., 95% of the time.)

More Related