360 likes | 503 Views
Statewide Overview. Common CORE 3.0 (CC 3.0) CA Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM) Katie A: Pathways to Well-being Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Title IV-E Waiver. bayareaacademy.org. CC3.0 Update. Goals of the Revision. Aligning Core to practice, including :
E N D
Statewide Overview Common CORE 3.0 (CC 3.0) CA Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM) Katie A: Pathways to Well-being Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Title IV-E Waiver bayareaacademy.org
Goals of the Revision • Aligning Core to practice, including: • Supporting implementation of a practice model • Sequencing of topics • Grouping content into areas of practice • Making the curriculum revision process more responsive to practice changes. • Identifying methods to support the key knowledge and skills in the Common Core for existing staff and other audiences.
Core 3.0 Practice BLOCKS • Foundation • Engagement • Assessment • Service Planning • Monitoring and Adapting • Transition
Themes integrated throughout the Practice Blocks: • Cultural • Trauma • Legal information • Assessment tools • CWS/CMS • ICWA • Other foundational material as it applies
Where we will have information but will recommend additional training: • Mental and Behavioral Health • Substance Abuse • Intimate Partner Violence • Sexual Abuse • Advanced Legal Topics • Non Minor Dependent Youth • Safety Organized Practice
Next Steps • Regional Meetings • County Meetings • Trainer Forums • Field Based Training • Development, vetting and piloting of curriculum • Landscape Survey For more information visit: http://calswec.berkeley.edu/common-core-30
Field Based Training Subcommittee contact Joanne Pritchard: jpritchard@berkeley.edu Technical Team contact Sevaughn Banks sevaughn@berkeley.edu
Towards a Statewide Practice Model • Beginning in 2012 the CWDA Children’s Committee has been working to develop a statewide practice model • Goal: To define California’s Child Welfare Services as a profession grounded in theory, with a set of core values, common elements and identified behaviors
Stakeholder Engagement • Statewide and County-level initiatives have been informed by broad stakeholder engagement • Youth,Parents, Caregivers, Tribes, Communities • Results of that engagement have informed the work of the statewide Practice Model development • Further engagement in inviting partners to participate in workshops • Additional engagement will be an essential goal of next steps in the evolution of the Practice Model
Guiding Vision • California’s 58 counties embrace one practice model that guides their individual Child Welfare Services programs by integrating successful practices into a framework that supports the achievement of safety, permanency and well-being for children and their families in the Child Welfare Services system.
PRACTICE BEHAVIORS • There are currently 16 draft practice behaviors • Practice behaviors fall into FIVE practice elements: • Teaming • Engagement • Inquiry and Exploration • Advocacy • Accountability • Workforce Development and Support
Next Steps • A guide is for the engagement of stakeholders to give input to practice behaviors • This will be started at the regional children’s meetings [BARCC] • Regions will determine how they are going to engage their partners • Information will go to CalSWEC for compiling then back to the Design Team for review.
For more information visit: http://calswec.berkeley.edu/california-child-welfare-core-practice-model
Regional Learning Collaborative Update • Next LC: September 22nd • Statewide LC Convening: August 21stin Sacramento
Focus of next LC • TEAMING MEETINGS
Sharing Resources • Toolkit • Listserv/Forum • Other recommendations for promoting more sharing? • Suggestions for streamlining communication
Focus of Statewide Convening • Statewide sharing of what is working, what are the challenges. • Areas of focus are teaming, resources, engagement of youth and families, collaboration and training. • WHEN : August 21, 2014 / Sacramento
What is CQI? • CQI is the complete process of identifying, describing and analyzing strengths and problems and then testing, implementing, learning from and revising solutions. It relies on an organizational culture that is proactive and supports continuous learning. CQI is firmly grounded in the overall mission, vision and values of the agency. Perhaps most importantly, it is dependent on the active inclusion and participation of staff at all levels of the agency, children, youth, families and stakeholders throughout the process. Information Memorandum: Continuous Quality Improvement in Title IV-B and IV-E Programs, ACYF-CB-12-07, 8/27/12: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/im1207.pdf
Five Components of CQI • CQI Foundational Administrative Structure • Quality Data Collection • Case Record Review Data and Process • Analysis and Dissemination of Quality Data • Feedback to Stakeholders and Decision Makers and Adjustment to Programs and Processes Information Memorandum: Continuous Quality Improvement in Title IV-B and IV-E Programs, ACYF-CB-12-07, 8/27/12: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/im1207.pdf
What’s happening now? • 1st shared Learning Collaborative on Developing a Comprehensive CQI System was held in SF on May 29 and 30, 2014. • Sponsored by Casey Family Programs. • Participating Teams - San Francisco, Alameda, Fresno, Sacramento, San Diego and CDSS. • Alameda – in beginning planning stages. Working to utilize Implementation Science as they plan. • San Francisco –Develop a shared vision to create a Learning Organization, integrate CQI into the Core Practice Model using SOP without reinventing the wheel.
What are the implications for training? Trainings will likely be needed in the following areas: • Increasing staff knowledge about data and analysis at all levels of the organization • Supervisor training for daily utilization of data in order to support goals • Data retrieval, analysis and application • Using and integrating quantitative and qualitative data in order to get the most information • How to prepare and present data
BAA Next Steps • Continue participating in Shared Learning Collaborative • Continue to support Alameda and SF with implementation planning including: • Preparing workforce for implementation • Messaging and communication planning • Strengthening “learning organization” culture • Creating an infrastructure that supports data review and the use of data at every meeting
Interested Bay Area Counties: • Alameda • San Francisco • Santa Clara • Santa Cruz • Sonoma
Identified Strategies • Child Welfare has agreed on Safety Organized Practice as a strategy to keep children safely at home. • Probation has identified Wrap Around as a prevention to entering the system
Safety Organized Practice • What are the essential elements of SOP that must be included? • What elements should be studied/evaluated? • Is there a staging of implementation needed?
Timeline • Insert Timeline
Next Steps for RTA • Coaching resource development • Working with counties in implementation • Readiness assessments • Training and coaching support