1 / 17

clark university department of psychology worcester, ma, usa

Wieso ‘Being Bad’ ein ganz natuerliches Phaenomen ist: 13-jaehrige Jungen zum Thema: ‘Was Maedchen wollen’. clark university department of psychology worcester, ma, usa. michael bamberg. ‘Small story’: “ Kevin, how disgusting! ” --- gestern war ‘SGAD’ – und ich hab Kevin reingelegt

gaia
Download Presentation

clark university department of psychology worcester, ma, usa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wieso ‘Being Bad’ ein ganz natuerliches Phaenomen ist: 13-jaehrige Jungen zum Thema: ‘Was Maedchen wollen’ clark university department of psychology worcester, ma, usa michael bamberg

  2. ‘Small story’: “Kevin, how disgusting!” --- gestern war ‘SGAD’ – und ich hab Kevin reingelegt POSITIONIERUNG gegenüber Mädchen und Kevin gegenüber Vic und Moderator gegenüber ---‘normativer Heterosexualität’ ---‘political correctness’ (‘fine tuning’ zwischen ‘obnoxious’ + ‘okay’) ---‘being bad’ (was es heisst ein ‘schlimmer Junge’ zu sein) ‘Small Story’: “My Mom was like: ‘Do I know you?’” --- wie ich mich aus der Affäre ziehen konnte POSITIONIERUNG gegenüber Judy + Mom (Mädchen + Lehrer) gegenüber V und M gegenüber ---Heteronormativität ---‘political correctness’ (‘fine tuning’ dessen ‘was erlaubt ist’) ---normativer männlicher Sexualität (durchaus ambivalent) kurz-geschichte 1 kurz-geschichte 2

  3. “Kevin, how disgusting!” • Gestern war ‘SGAD’ • Ich hab nem Maedchen in den Po gekniffen und Kevin die Schuld in die Schuh geschoben • Was fuer ein Wimp Kevin ist!

  4. My Mom was like: ‘Do I know you?’ • Judy tried to challenge me and my Mom came • Girls say ‘don’t do it’, but they want it done • The whole school did it • Teachers approve • What if girls turned the tables on us?

  5. The Project • 5-year-long pilot project of 10-15-year-old males <lower class children> <3rd year> <300h of audio + video of 54 boys in the first year> • Cross-sectional + longitudinal data <10-, 12-, & 15-years of age> • DATA: • Observational • Writing • Interview • Group discussions • After-school non-adult guided interactions • TOPICS: -friends, -girls, -emotions/body, -future

  6. Maedchen + Jungen im Vergleich

  7. Three Kinds of Narrative Approaches to the Study of Self and Identity • Life-Story Approaches • Life-Event Approaches • “Small” Stories • Short narrative accounts • Embedded in every-day interactions • Unnoticed as ‘stories’ by the participants • Unnoticed as ‘narratives’ by researchers • But highly relevant for identity formation processes

  8. Life-Stories Dan McAdams (1993) + Gabi Rosenthal (1998) Elicitation Technique Analysis of lives Focus on coherence + health Life-Events Most narrative research Elicitation is focused on particular events or experiences Analysis of focused area Meaning of event in one’s life Life-Stories + Life-Events

  9. Merits of narrative ‘life research’life-history + life-event approaches • Accentuates and brings to light lived experience • Forces participants to focus on the meaning of THAT event in their lives • Accentuates the continuity of experience • And sheds light on aspects that appear discontinuous • Assumes a unified sense of personal identity -- against which ‘experience’ is constantly sorted out

  10. potential shortcomingsor open questions • How does this ‘unified sense of self’ come to existence? • How does the person ‘learn’ to “sort out” events against what is called ‘life’? • Overemphasis of stories about the ‘self’ • Cutting out all those stories about others • Overemphasis of ‘long’ stories • Cutting out everyday, “small” stories

  11. why? • Influences of ‘traditional’ psychological inquiry • Interests in selves + self-coherence • Influences of traditional narratology • Work with texts (written texts) • Assuming authors as behind the texts • Assuming criteria of goodness for narratives • Interviews as windows into selves

  12. Narrative Dimensions(Ochs & Capps, 2001) • Tellership • one active teller vs. many • Tellability • high vs. low • Embeddedness • detached from surrounding talk vs. situational embeddedness • Moral stance • one moral message vs. different + conflicting messages • Linearity & Temporality • closed temporal + causal order vs. open + spatial

  13. Stories about others:the Davie Hogan story Positioning with Davie Hogan. Stories, Tellings & Identities. Chapter in: C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society.  London: Sage. (2003)

  14. Characteristics of “SMALL” stories • Short • Conversationally Embedded + Negotiated • before • during • after • Fine tuned positioning strategies • fine-tuned vis-à-vis the audience • fine-tuned vis-à-vis dominant + counter narratives • multiple moral stances (testing out and experimenting with identity projections) • Low in tellability, linearity, temporality + causality

  15. Kurz-geschichte 2 “My Mom was like: ‘Do I know you?’” Kurz-geschichte 1“Kevin, how disgusting!”

  16. Functions of “SMALL” stories • Practice in doing identity work • Continuous editing of experience • Retelling of experience • Re-tuning these tellings according to • different audiences • Different master-narratives • different (developing) senses of ‘who-I-am’ • Resulting in some sense of coherence • though one that is constantly reworked

  17. conclusion • So, rather than assuming the existence of identity + sense of self – and viewing narratives as reflections thereof, I am suggesting to study the emergence of a sense of self by way of exploring the SMALL stories people tell in their EVERYDAY interactions

More Related