70 likes | 238 Views
Automated Scoring Yes, It Is Ready for Prime Time Julie Quinn Coordinator Test Administration and Data Assessment and Accountability Utah State Office of Education julie.quinn@schools.utah.gov. 2009. Utah Legislature required an online writing assessment for grades 5 and 8 (53A-1-603)
E N D
Automated ScoringYes, It Is Ready for Prime TimeJulie QuinnCoordinatorTest Administration and DataAssessment and AccountabilityUtah State Office of Educationjulie.quinn@schools.utah.gov
2009 • Utah Legislature required an online writing assessment for grades 5 and 8 (53A-1-603) • Contract awarded for formative and summative online writing assessment, exclusive AI scoring, grades 5 and 8 • Many LEAs provide formative online writing for other grade levels at their own cost
In the Beginning Formative • Educator skepticism about AI scoring validity and reliability • Positive response to immediate scoring and increased opportunities for writing feedback • Vendor and teacher prompts
In the Beginning Summative • Misunderstandings about AI engine training and scoring rules • Positive response to online administration and AI identification of alert papers • Contract for AI scoring only, vendor provided human read-behind
AI vs. Human Scoring 2010 Grade 5 Agreement Rates N=98
AI vs. Human Scoring 2010 Grade 8 Agreement Rates N=99
Outcomes • Students are more engaged in writing with immediate feedback • The number of writing events with feedback has greatly increased • AI is consistent and accurate • Utah will continue to use AI exclusively for summative writing assessments