1 / 30

Emerging Computer Applications to Multidisciplinary Security Issues

Emerging Computer Applications to Multidisciplinary Security Issues. Charles Tappert and Sung-Hyuk Cha School of Computer Science and Information Systems. Previous Research Experience. Charles Tappert 26 years research at IBM Speech recognition and processing

gale
Download Presentation

Emerging Computer Applications to Multidisciplinary Security Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emerging Computer Applications to Multidisciplinary Security Issues Charles Tappert and Sung-Hyuk Cha School of Computer Science and Information Systems

  2. Previous Research Experience • Charles Tappert • 26 years research at IBM • Speech recognition and processing • Handwriting recognition and pen computing • 7 years teaching at West Point • Research on handheld/wearable computers • Sung Cha • 3 years graduate work at the world renown Center for Excellence in Document Analysis and Recognition (CEDAR), SUNY Buffalo • Individuality of handwriting • 2 years research at Samsung • Medical information systems

  3. Our Current Areas of ResearchRelated to Security • Handwriting and Forensic Document Analysis • Speech/Voice Related Studies • Individuality of Handwriting, Voice, Iris (fundamental studies for biometric authentication) • Related Pattern Recognition Research • Wearable/Mobile/Pervasive Computing Research • Forensics Applications

  4. Security Related Research/Projects • D.P.S. Dissertations • M.S. Dissertations • Graduate and Undergraduate Students Projects • CS615-616 Software Engineering • CS631 Computer Vision • CS632 Pervasive Computing Research Seminar • CS396 Pattern Recognition • Examples of Security-Related Research Studies • Security-Related Research Publications • NSF Funding Proposals

  5. Security Related D.P.S. Dissertations • An Efficient First Pass of a Two-Stage Approach for Automatic Language Identification of Telephone Speech, Jonathan Law (2002) • Information Assurance Strategic Planning: A Taxonomy, Steven Parshley (2004) • A Cybercrime Taxonomy, Vincent Gisonti (2004) • Real-time Trifocal Vision with Locate Positioning System, Yi Rong (2004) • Stego-Marking in TCP/IP Packets, Eric Cole (2004) • The Computer Forensics and Cybersecurity Governance Model, Kenneth Brancik (2005)

  6. Security Related M.S. Dissertations • Forged Handwriting Detection, Hung-Chun Chen (spring 2003) • Speaker Individuality, Naresh Trilok (fall 2003) • More coming

  7. Security Related Projects • Handwriting Forgery Detection, Forgery Quiz System • Recognizing a Handwriter’s Style/Nationality • Emergency Pre-Hospital Care Communication System • Eigenface Recognition System • Interactive Visual Systems (collab. with RPI, NSF funding?) • Object Tracking System (Surveillance) • Object Segmentation (X-ray scan) • Biometric Authentication (Fingerprint, Iris, Handwriting, Voice) • Others: Steganography, Wireless Security, Forensics, Spam Detection, Language Classification from Text

  8. Project Customers/Sources • Pace University • School of Computer Science and Information Systems • Dyson College of Arts and Sciences • Lubin School of Business • Lienhard School of Nursing • Department of Information Technology • Doctor of Professional Studies in Computing Program • Office of Planning, Assessment, Research, and Academic Support • Outside Organizations • Northern Westchester Hospital • Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center • Psychology Department at SUNY New Paltz • Yonsei University, Korea • CEDAR, SUNY Buffalo • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute • IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

  9. Benefits of Student Projects • Stellar real-world learning experience for students • Customers receive valuable systems • Promotes interdisciplinary collaboration and Pace and local community involvement • Furthers student and faculty research • Enhances relationships between the university and local technology companies • Increases national recognition of the university

  10. Examples of Security-Related Research Studies • Forgery Detection • Interactive Visual System • Speaker Individuality

  11. Forgery Detection: Key Idea • Forensic literature indicates that successful forgers often forge handwriting shape and size by carefully copying or tracing the authentic handwriting • Exploit computing technology to investigate this and possibly to develop techniques to aid forensic document examiners

  12. Forgery Detection: Hypotheses • Good forgeries – those that retain the shape and size of authentic writing – tend to be written more slowly (carefully) than authentic writing • Good forgeries are likely to be wrinklier (less smooth) than authentic handwriting

  13. Forgery Detection: Methodology • Sample collection: online, scan to get offline • Feature extraction: Speed, Wrinkliness • Statistical analysis

  14. (b) (a) (a) Number of in the boundary = 69 (b) Number of in the boundary = 32 (b) Number of in the boundary = 32

  15. Fractal Measure of Wrinkliness

  16. Forgery Detection: Experiment • 10 subjects, each wrote • 3 authentic handwriting samples • 3 forgeries of each of the other 9 subjects • 30 authentic and 270 forged samples • Significance results (T-test) • Forgeries are written slower: p = 5.90E-09 • Forgeries are wrinklier: p = 0.0205

  17. IVS is a technology, not just a flower identification application We also have preliminary results on flag recognition, and we plan to explore the applications of sign, face, and skin-lesion recognition • This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during your presentation • In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button • Select “Meeting Minder” • Select the “Action Items” tab • Type in action items as they come up • Click OK to dismiss this box • This will automatically create an Action Item slide at the end of your presentation with your points entered. Interactive Visual System (IVS)

  18. IVS Motivation • Image recognition can be a difficult problem • Modern AI and pattern recognition techniques try to automate the process – that is, they do not include the human in the equation • Humans and computers have different strengths • Computers excel at large memory and computation • Humans excel at segmentation • We propose combining human and computer to increase the speed and accuracy of recognition

  19. IVS Flower User Interface • Load Flower Image • Select Features • Identify • Previous 3 Hits • Next 3 Hits • Store New Flower • Auto Feature Extract • List Extracted Features

  20. IVS Flower Shape Model

  21. IVS: Flag Recognition • We have extended the Interactive Visual System to other applications, and have preliminary results on flag recognition • Demonstration by Dr. Sung Cha

  22. IVS: NSF Proposal Applications • Foreign Sign Recognition • Shape model: rectangle • Face Recognition • Shape model: 3D face template • Skin Lesion Recognition • Shape model?

  23. Speaker Individuality • Hypothesis: a person’s voice is unique and therefore we can verify the identity of an individual from his/her voice samples • Methodology: use a statistically inferable dichotomy (verification) model that Dr. Cha has used to show handwriting individuality

  24. Speaker Individuality: Methodology • Segment common portion of utterance: “My name is” • Compute spectral data: output from 13 filters every 10 msec • Extract fixed number of features per utterance from the spectral data • Use the dichotomy (verification) model to obtain experimental results

  25. Speaker Individuality: Segmentation

  26. “My name is” from Two Speakers

  27. Neural Network Dichotomy Model Feature Extrac- tion Distance compu- tation Same/ Different

  28. Speaker Individuality: Experiments • 10 samples from each of 10 speakers • 450 intra-speaker distances • 4500 inter-speaker distances • Train NN on a subset of the intra-speaker and inter-speaker distances • Test on different subsets • 94 percent accuracy • 98 percent with bad samples removed

  29. Security-Related Research Publications • http://csis.pace.edu/csis/cgi-front/sec/security.pl?cat=11

  30. Security Related Funding Proposals • NSF 01-100, CISE-HCI • Interactive Visual Processing • Collaboration with RPI • Submitted January 8, 2004 • NSF 03-602 Computer Vision • Individuality Studies (fundamental studies for biometric authentication) • Submitted December 19, 2003

More Related