1 / 12

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011. Lee Howard, Committee Chair. Status. Busy committee members, hard to meet Scheduling regular meetings, not meetings-as-needed Three documents drafted: Part I: Goals and Definitions Part II: Process

ganesa
Download Presentation

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair

  2. Status • Busy committee members, hard to meet • Scheduling regular meetings, not meetings-as-needed • Three documents drafted: • Part I: Goals and Definitions • Part II: Process • Part III: Petition Process • Recommendations to Advisory Council

  3. Part I: Goals and Definitions • Purpose • Definitions • Scope • Principles • Criteria for Policy Changes

  4. Part II: Process

  5. Part III: Petition Process • When petitions may start, when they end • What may be petitioned • Criteria for success • Outcome of successful petitions

  6. Problems Identified

  7. Proposed Process and Guidelines • The following slides show a summary of Committee’s thinking • We committed to solicit feedback before recommending changes • Each slide shows: • A step in the proposed Policy Development Process • with supporting operational guidance.

  8. Discussion Points • Public policy meeting • Purpose to inform AC or to determine consensus? • Slows process but ensures consideration • Required for all proposals?

  9. Next Steps • Formalize PDP draft for AC and Board review • Send to PPML for public comment • Review additional problem areas for additional work

  10. Problems Identified

  11. Problems Identified

  12. Summary • Presentations to AC • Process documents in final stages • Easier to understand, easier to participate

More Related