100 likes | 124 Views
Washington State Department of Commerce. Transfer of Development Rights: A Regional Approach. June 2012. Overview. TDR in Puget Sound Regional TDR Program/Alliance Watershed Grants in Puget Sound to implement the Puget Sound Partnership’s Action Agenda. TDR in Puget Sound. Issaquah.
E N D
Washington State Department of Commerce Transfer of Development Rights: A Regional Approach June 2012
Overview TDR in Puget Sound Regional TDR Program/Alliance Watershed Grants in Puget Sound to implement the Puget Sound Partnership’s Action Agenda
TDR in Puget Sound Issaquah Existing conservation TDR: • King County (1998/2001) • Redmond (1997) • Issaquah (2005) • Seattle (1998/2001) • Bellevue (2008) • Sammamish (2011) • Kitsap County (2006) • Bainbridge Island (1996) • Pierce County (2007) • Snohomish (2004/2008) • Arlington (2004) • Everett (1991/2006)
Focus on Regional Transfers • Sending areas – land designated by the counties as sending areas that are: • Agricultural or forest land of long-term significance; • Rural land being farmed or managed for forestry; • Land whose conservation meets other state and regionally adopted priorities; and • Land that is in current use as a manufactured/mobile home park. • Receiving areas - incorporated cities and towns
Regional TDR Alliance Alliance Partners: Snohomish County, Pierce County, King County, Forterra, Puget Sound Regional Council, and Commerce to: • Implement and enhance county TDR programs • Build capacity in cities to receive development rights from farms, forest land and open space • Provide information resources to cities and counties • Interlocal Terms and Conditions Rule
TDR Project Grants for Cities • Seattle • Snohomish • Tacoma* $1 million in grants to 10 cities (*plus $ from King County): • Arlington • Everett • Issaquah • Mountlake Terrace • Normandy Park* • Port Orchard • Puyallup*
Watershed Protection and Restoration: Land Use and Working Lands • Focus on working farm and forest lands, and vibrant cities: • Skagit County and Burlington • King County and Kirkland • Snohomish County
Lessons Learned: Inter-jurisdictional issues Benefits to cities for receiving density Inclusion of sufficient receiving areas and not too much sending area Relationship to existing density bonus menus
Lessons Learned: TDR Success Factors Essential For Success Demand for bonus development Customized receiving areas Extremely Important Strict sending-area regulations Few alternatives to TDR in receiving areas Market incentives Source: “What Makes TDRs Work?”, Pruetz and Standridge, JAPA, Winter 2009
Information on TDR and other related topics are on our web site at:www.commerce.wa.gov/tdrOr contactheather.ballash@commerce.wa.gov(360) 725-3044