1 / 7

TRI ARIE BOWO, 2250405541 HUMOR AND ITS IMPLICATURE IN NICK ZAGONES PLAY OHIO

TRI ARIE BOWO, 2250405541 HUMOR AND ITS IMPLICATURE IN NICK ZAGONES PLAY OHIO. Identitas Mahasiswa.

garnet
Download Presentation

TRI ARIE BOWO, 2250405541 HUMOR AND ITS IMPLICATURE IN NICK ZAGONES PLAY OHIO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TRI ARIE BOWO, 2250405541HUMOR AND ITS IMPLICATURE IN NICK ZAGONES PLAY OHIO

  2. Identitas Mahasiswa • - NAMA : TRI ARIE BOWO - NIM : 2250405541 - PRODI : Sastra Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : arie_gering pada domain yahoo.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : Drs. Amir Sisbiyanto, M.Hum. - PEMBIMBING 2 : Dra. Rahayu Puji H., M.Hum. - TGL UJIAN : 2009-08-05

  3. Judul • HUMOR AND ITS IMPLICATURE IN NICK ZAGONES PLAY OHIO

  4. Abstrak • Humor is widely used as a generic term for everything that appeals laughter. This definition is also suitable for the violation of Cooperative principle/ Implicature which also cause laughter. The object of the study is a Play entitled Ohio. This study focuses on the violation of Cooperative Principle which causes laughter. In this research, the writer would like to achieve three objectives of the study. The first objective is the writer wants to describe how humor is applied in nick Zagone’s play Ohio. Secondly, the writer would like to find out what kind of humor is reflected in the play. The last objective is the writer would like to describe the Implicature of the humorous expression which is being applied on the play. The writer used a descriptive qualitative research as a method of his study since the data were in the form of written words and they were descriptively analyzed. There were several steps in analyzing Humor and its Implicature in Nick Zagone’s play Ohio. The first step is reading the play script in order to understand the play. Secondly, the writer separating the data and non data by marking, underlining, and bracketing of the data or usually called identifying. Third steps, the writer list all the identified data and put them in tables or inventorying. The final steps, the writer analyzes the data and tries to explain the humorous expression through the theory presented by expert or analysis. From the analysis, the writer finds that in Nick Zagone's play Ohio, humor is being applied in two ways which is in the form of word (humor of word) and in the form of situation created by the author (humor of situation.). In relation with its form, the writer found 7 form of humor which is reflected in the play, they are Repartee, Sarcasm, Mimicry, Irony, Burlesque, Wit, and Satire and in correlation with Implicature, the writer found 4 violation of Cooperative Principle or later being called Implicature, they are the violation of maxim of quantity (Quantity Implicature), the violation of maxim of quality (Quality Implicature), the violation of maxim of Relevance (Relevance Implicature), and the violation of maxim of manner (Manner Implicature). By studying the Humor and Implicature the writer found the composition in producing humor and in the future, the writer wished that there will be more study in the world of humor because it can temporarily makes us forget our sorrow, it takes us away from our burden and lead us to the nice and friendly universe. Someday, the writer wishes that humor can't only be enjoyed but it also able to be studied in order to preserve it and finally to reproduce humor.

  5. Kata Kunci • Humor and Implicature

  6. Referensi • Alexander, R J. 1997. Aspects of Verbal Humour in English. Tübingen: Narr. Allen, R G. 1991. Horrible Prettiness: Burlesque and American Culture. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press. Alternbernd, L Lewis. 1996. A Handbook for the Study of Drama. Canada: Macmillan Publising Co.,Inc. Benton, W. 1968. Encyclopedia Britannica. Volume 7. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. Bright. W. 1992 Pragmatics, implicature, and presupposition. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, VOL. 2. New York: Oxford University Press. Brocket, O. 1969. The Theatre. USA: Holt, Reinhart, Winston Inc. Cole. P. 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature In Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. Davis, W. A. 1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Draitser, E. 1994. Techniques of Satire: The Case of Saltykov-Shchedrin. Berlin- New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press. Grice. H. P. 1989. Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Harnish, R. 1976. Logical form and implicature In An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. Hirschberg, J. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland. Hutcheon, L. 1994. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge Karttunen, L., S Peters. 1979. Conversational implicature. In Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press. Kempson, M. 1988. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 70 Kenney, W. 1966. How to Analyze Fiction. New York: Monarch Press. Kennedy, X J. 1983. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry and Drama. Toronto: Little Brown and Company. Lewis, P. 1989. Comic Effect: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Humor in Literature. New York: State University of New York Press. Inc. McCawley, J. D. 1978. Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press. McChutchan, W J. 1965. Plot Outline of Shakespeare’s Comedy Scene by Scene. Canada: Barnes and Nobles Company. Perrine, L. 1959. Story and Structure. New York: Zharcourt, Brace & World, Inc. Preece et al (eds). 1943. Merriam-Webster’s Subject Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Massachusetts. USA: Merriam-Webster, Inc. Rees, R J. 1973. English Literature: An Introduction for Foreign Readers. London: McMillan Education. Rustono. 1999. Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press. Shipley, J T. (ed). 1969. Dictionary of the World Literature. New Jersey: Little Field and CO. Saleh, M. 1967. Seni Sandiwara Dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunung Agung. Travis, C. 1986. Inference and implicature. In Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Zaenab et al. 1994. Classic Humor in South Sulawesi Literature. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Cutrell, D. Implicature. (Online) Available HTTP://WWW.POWERSET.COM/BLOG/ARTICLES/2007/07/16/IMPLICATURE. September 10, 2008 Merriam-Webster. Repartee. (Online Available) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/repartee. August 9, 2009 Wikipedia. Buffonary. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouffon. August 6, 2009 Wikipedia. Mimicry. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimicry. August 6, 2009 Wikipedia. Farce. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farce. August 6, 2009 Wikipedia. Paul Grice. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice. September 10, 2008 Wikipedia. Sarcasm. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm. August 5, 2009 Wikipedia. Slapstick. (Online Available) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slapstick. August 6, 2009 Zagone, N. Full Length Play: Ohio. (Online) Available http://theatrehistory.com/plays/ohio001-9.html, September 10, 2008.

  7. Terima Kasih • http://unnes.ac.id

More Related