70 likes | 206 Views
Inaugural meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on “ Monitoring forest resources for SFM in the UNECE Region ”. MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15 October 2004. Roman Michalak. Geneva, Palais des Nations, 25-27 April 2005. 1990. FRA. 1990. Strasbourg. 1993. Helsinki.
E N D
Inaugural meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on“Monitoring forest resources for SFM in the UNECE Region” MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15October 2004 Roman Michalak Geneva, Palais des Nations, 25-27 April 2005
1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna 2007 Warsaw Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO 1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO SFM
1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO 1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna new f. 2005 GFRA 2007 Warsaw GFRA 2010 Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO SFM
1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO 1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna new f. 2005 GFRA II C&I ”b” 2007 Warsaw ”a” GFRA 2010 Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO SFM
Agreements • The ELM agreed that both qualitative andquantitative indicators should be taken into account when preparing the report on SFM forWarsaw Conference • The MCPFE General Coordinating Council had suggested that the Liaison Unit Warsaw would perform the reporting for the Warsaw Conference in co-operation with the UNECE/FAO secretariat, and supported by the Team of Specialists on “Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE region”.
Agreements • The need for further development of co-operation amongthe MCPFE and other C&I processes, in particular the Montreal Process, was expressed. • Regional processes should fit the global frame, which at the same timeshould consider specific regional conditions. • The ELM also noted that the reporting should be harmonized with relevant international processes (to the extent possible).
Agreements • The participants of the ELM underlined the importance of involving relevant institutions into the preparatory process and recommended making the best use of existing networks and expertise. • In order to have this report completed on time and to be able to make the best use of existing networks and expertise “involved partners should be working together in a rather informal and flexible way”.