800 likes | 977 Views
COPS 2007 Technology Program Kickoff Conference. Federal Initiatives. Introduction. Ron Hawley Tim Reid Jeremy Warren Bob Chiaradio Keith Young. Ron Hawley. U.S. DOJ’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. October 30, 2007 • Bethesda, Maryland. Global 101.
E N D
COPS 2007 Technology Program Kickoff Conference Federal Initiatives
Introduction Ron Hawley Tim Reid Jeremy Warren Bob Chiaradio Keith Young
U.S. DOJ’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative October 30, 2007 • Bethesda, Maryland Global 101
What Is Global? FACA advisory body to the federal government Specifically, the U.S. Attorney General Supported and guided by Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and Office of Justice Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Local, state, and tribal voice to the AG and justice-interested community on standards-based justice information sharing
Who Is Global?—The Global Advisory Committee (GAC) Approximately 30 U.S. Attorney General-selected agencies, associations, constituencies Key personnel from all governmental levels Local State Tribal Federal International Addressing technical and policy issues
Global Advisory Committee (continued) Representatives Prosecutors, public defenders, and courts Corrections agencies Probation and parole departments Law enforcement agencies Victim services Juvenile justice Membership reflects a fundamental GAC tenet—for Global to succeed in Leading the Way—Getting the Right Information to the Right People in the Right Place at the Right Time
What Is Global?Intangible and Invaluable Products: Trust and Collaboration
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Background Through FACA of 1972 (Public Law 92-463), Congress formally recognized the merits of seeking advice on a broad range of issues affecting federal policies and programs Complying With FACA GAC membership Charter Designated federal official Open meetings announced in Federal Register Public access to documentation
Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council (CICC)/ Global Intelligence Working Group (GIWG) GIWG formed to develop the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP) as described in “Criminal Intelligence Sharing: A National Plan for Intelligence-Led Policing at the Local, State, and Federal Levels—Recommendations From the IACP Intelligence Summit” CICC provides guidance and advice in connection with the implementation and refinement of the NCISP Both serve as advocates for local law enforcement agencies in their efforts to develop and share criminal intelligence for the promotion of public safety and the security of our nation
GIWG/CICC (continued) NCISP development and implementation Fusion Center Guidelines Regional fusion center conferences National Fusion Center Conference Gang Intelligence Strategy Committee 28 CFR Part 23 Data Call Support and guidance for the President’s Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Implementation Plan
GIWG/CICC—DeliverablesThe National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP)
GIWG/CICC—Highlighted Activities Fusion centers Development, refinement, and implementation Training and technical assistance Second annual National Fusion Center Conference Formalized fusion center regions: NE, SE, Midwest, and Western
GIWG/CICC—Highlighted Activities (Continued) • Implementing the Information Sharing Environment (ISE) • State and major urban area fusion centers are key to the nationwide intelligence information sharing framework • Global effort specifically informing • Guideline 2 of the ISE—Common Framework for Information Sharing • Guideline 3 of the ISE—Standardize Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Procedures
Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group (GISWG) Standards that enable transparent integration of disparate systems Justice Reference Architecture
GISWG—Highlighted Activities Justice Reference Architecture (JRA) A well-conceived set of principles, policies that can be followed to build agile systems, now called services A method of describing justice information sharing relationships
GISWG—Highlighted Activities(Continued) • The conceptual components (software, hardware, infrastructure, policies, procedures, and practices) necessary to bring these relationships to life in a particular context • The cross-agency management framework for guiding prioritization, development, deployment, and maintenance
GISWG—Results of the Global JRA Identification of service components, or areas that produce a specific granular business outcome that typically more than one agency needs to know (e.g., criminal identity based on fingerprints or other biometrics) Service components that can be readily combined to manage major cross-function and cross-agency business processes Services that can be created by one agency and reused by many
Global Security Working Group (GSWG) Security measures for today’s enhanced information sharing abilities Security guidelines and promising practices for trusted information sharing Recommendations for a federated privilege and identity management system to provide users with a trusted credential for access into other justice systems Recommendations for a framework for trusted information sharing
GSWG—Deliverables Applying Security Practices to Justice Information Sharing
GSWG—Highlighted Activities Global Federated Identity and Privilege Management (GFIPM) framework, standardizing solutions to issues of Identification/authentication Privilege management Audit Next steps for GFIPM—expanded pilot efforts, public specification release Implementing Privacy Policy in Justice Information Sharing: A Technical Framework
Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group (GPIQWG) Information privacy Data quality/information accuracy Criminal history records Criminal intelligence information Juvenile justice information Civil justice information Local, state, and tribal input on implementing the Information Sharing Environment’s (ISE) Privacy Guidelines
GPIQWG—Deliverables Privacy Policy Development Guide and Implementation Templates
GPIQWG—DeliverablesInformation Quality: The Foundation for Justice Decision Making
GPIQWG—Highlighted Activities Information quality assessment tools Training and technical assistance related to privacy policy and information quality Technical solutions Collaborative effort with GSWG
Global Outreach Working Group Newest working group Systematic: no longer ad hoc outreach Ensure consistent, efficient, and effective delivery of the Global message and Global resources Goals “Inreach” and outreach Brand awareness Adoption of deliverables and recommendations—the good work of the GAC is only valuable if recognized and utilized by the justice community
Outreach Deliverables Promotion of Working Groups’ recommendations and resources (delivery mechanism) Original content—Global Highlights Global Web site www.it.ojp.gov/global
OutreachHighlighted Activities Web site refresh Baseline awareness survey Inreach Global 101 Matrix of Global activities Capturing success stories
The IJIS Institute A nonprofit consortium representing the leading companies that supply IT solutions and services to the justice, public safety, and homeland security sectors Funded by a combination of industry contributions and grants from multiple federal agencies through the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Joining the resources of industry with the interests of government to improve the systems that provide critical information to the justice and public safety professionals who protect and serve our communities
The IJIS InstituteHelping Implement Global Recommendations Our Services Technology assistance Training NISS help desk and knowledge center Program management National scope issue management Communications and outreach
Volunteer Service on Global/BJA Committees and Working Groups—FY 2006 (Ending June 30, 2006) • Industry technologists • Number of volunteers—255 • Total person hours—17,000
Membership Has Its Privileges…and Responsibilities • Seat at the by-appointment-only committee table • Be the voice of your constituency on Global • Attendance at biannual committee meetings • Designation of a standing proxy • Opportunity to vote on important recommendations to the U.S. Attorney General • Invitation to join the Global Working Group (or task team or committee) of your choice • Promotion of Global, GAC recommendations, and resources to your colleagues • Be the voice of Global within your constituency
FDLE’s Top 10 Reasons to Participate in Global Facing and overcoming identified challenges in the proper forum Remaining current on issues affecting your policy and practice Accessing professional, credible products at no cost for use by practitioners across the country Maintaining consistency in implementation through national standards, Global guidance, and documentation Leveraging time, money, and effort already spent
FDLE’s Top 10 Reasons to Participate in Global (Continued) • Reducing the number of redundant systems • Establishing and maintaining credibility • Networking with subject-matter experts at the policy level • Contributing your voice on issues that affect your agencies • Controlling your own destiny—if you do not, someone else will
What can you do for Global? YOU Are Global – Let Global Work for You and Spread the Word
U.S. DOJ’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative October 30, 2007 • Bethesda, Maryland Global 101
COPS 2007 Technology Program Kickoff Conference Law Enforcement National Data Exchange (N-DEx) December 4, 2007
N-DEx Major Activities, Milestones, and Reviews for Increment 1 Program Management Week 8 Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) May 2 Development and Test Week 4 Design Concept Review (DCR) Mar 15 Requirements & Architecture Prototyping Week 10 Critical Design Review (CDR) May 8 Detailed Design Week 13 May 30 Final Design Review (CONTROL GATE 3) Week 30 Production Test Readiness Review (PTRR) Sept 17 Component Development, Test & Integration (at Landover, MD) Implementation and Integration Week 28 Site Acceptance Review (SAR) Sept 11 Functional & Interface Testing (at Landover, MD) ROE H/W Installation (at CJIS) Week 36 System Acceptance Test Readiness Review (STRR) (COMBINED CONTROL GATE 4 & 5) Oct 31 Deploy N-DEx Apps. to CJIS Week 40 Operational Readiness Review (ORR) System Acceptance Test (at CJIS) Operational Acceptance Review (OAR) (CONTROL GATE 6) RMS Conference participation Dec 4 Sr. Qrtly Advisory Board Mtgs Feb 27 Training, C&A, Deployment Operations and Maintenance Week 51 Operations and Maintenance
Cost Model • IIR/IJIS • Concept • Local and National perspective on cost to effectively deploy modifications to local, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement systems for connectivity to N-DEx • Process • Generate model to encompass total cost of connectivity across the types of systems in place today • Variables include agency type, number of agencies to participate, component cost for each agency, number of agency types, etc. • Shareholder’s committee • INSH
Deloitte • Subcontracted by Raytheon Corporation to assist in developing Increment Two (Booking and Incarceration) and Increment Three (Parole and Probation) strategic plans. • Will assist: • To develop a Communication plan • Develop a User Tracking mechanism • In coordination of centralized reporting • In developing new points-of-contact • In an overall N-DEx Liaison support plan
Train-the-Trainer Concept Utilize the existing agency trainers or training coordinators to provide N-DEx user support or additional training within their agency Bring agency trainers to CJIS for 1-2 days Currently scheduling 2-8 per agency 1 per associated FO Provide agency trainers with lesson plans, CDs of CBTs, live system interaction Beginning Feb 2008; have quarterly for future participating agencies User Training Computer Based Training (CBT) Six Modules Required by user role (2-3 modules per role) Users Manual – electronic; hard copy with agency trainer Additional training should be provided by the agency trainer/coordinator Training N-DEx will accommodate special requests for user training for Increment 1 agencies only. This is dependant upon CJIS available resources and includes a 2-4 hour block to reinforce information provided via CBTs Delaware – Initially requested N-DEx train 400 detectives. N-DEx proposes conducting two training sessions (with their trainer assisting), supporting their trainer for the next two sessions. The training responsibility will then be the state of Delaware training coordinators and staff. This complies with the N-DEx train-the-trainer concept.
Train-the-Trainer Feb 09 Feb 08 Increment 1 O&M Increment 2 Development Feb 09 Feb 08 Increment 1 Rollout Schedule • User Enrollment • Participating agencies • Surrounding agencies Feb 09 Dec 07 • Implementation Support • On-site at agency Feb 09 Mar 08