1 / 7

Incentives in a (Czech?) Bank

Incentives in a (Czech?) Bank. by Bogaard and Svejnar. HRM effects in services.

garrison-camacho
Download Presentation

Incentives in a (Czech?) Bank

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Incentives in a (Czech?) Bank by Bogaard and Svejnar

  2. HRM effects in services • Ann Bartel 2004 ILLR (100 citations in GS) Branches of a Canadian bank, branch manager decides on HRM (incentives, participation, skills), 2 periods, controls for manager quality using employee survey: sales annual % change= f(K, L, HRM, branch_age, MgrTenure, MarketX, FE_year, FE_branch, FE_mgr ) • Ichniowski&Shaw: insider econometrics: is the goal to measure adoption effect in a randomly chosen branch or early adopters?

  3. Literature • Evidence on HPWP: makes productivity go up as well as wages and job satisfaction, profits don't change much, more likely to be adopted when skilled labor is abundant. • Strategies: unit FE, time varying IV using industry adoption of HPWP from another country, matching.

  4. Bogaard and Svejnar This is not HPWP, but basic specialization. (+) Nice new data, alternative empirical strategies (IV, matching), lots of robustness checks, model to aid interpretation. 56 pages (and I’ll ask for 10 more). Wow. (-) Whole lotta IVing going on, head swimming. Stress on foreign/domestic in CEE in 2003-07? Magnitude of IV estimates huge (2x s.d.?).

  5. Experiment Region and size explain adoption. Bankers and advisors a different treatment. Need more info on the design (var in X): • Was this a surprise? Not much pre- data. • Who chose order of implementation? (within size or regional groups) In particular, early adoption (in t=1) as pilot in best branches, low hanging fruit within & across branches?

  6. IV strategy • IV idea: Regional/size adoption. Sequencing? • Then add size to both first and second stage? • IV is not similar to matching: IV is an across- group comparison (averaging unobs. within groups) zooming in on late adopters (LATE), whilst matching compares within groups. • Show missing 500 obs., first stage F tests, pscore estimation, common support, balancing tests, dif-in-difs w/ matching implementation (within group pscore?) etc.

  7. Minor Questions • Free riding or lower returns to late adopters? • Care about side payments? • Take out advisors in small branches in 2006? • Can do better on local demand? Un. rates? • No info on new footing (flow)? • Study effect on wages? • Must look at bad loans over time.

More Related