1 / 34

Social Psychology

Social Psychology. Let’s get this party started!. Self-concept vs. Self-esteem Concept - how you think about yourself Esteem - how worthy you think you are Creating appraisals of yourself Temporal comparison - based on previous performance Social comparison - based on other people

garth
Download Presentation

Social Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Psychology Let’s get this party started!

  2. Self-concept vs. Self-esteem • Concept - how you think about yourself • Esteem - how worthy you think you are • Creating appraisals of yourself • Temporal comparison - based on previous performance • Social comparison - based on other people • Reference groups - category to which you feel you belong • Relative deprivation - comparing what you have to your reference group. Social Comparison

  3. In-group bias • Out-group homogeneity • Self-fulfilling prophecy • An initial impression of someone can lead that person to behave according to that impression Social Identity

  4. Attribution theory - examines how we explain the behaviors of ourselves and others • People involved in any situation: • Actors - those involved in a situation • Observers - those watching a situation Social Understanding

  5. When attributions are biased: • Fundamental attribution error • Believing internal (dispositional) factors are more influential than external (situational) factors. • Actor-observer bias • Actors tend to make external (situational) attributions • Observers tend to make internal (dispositional) attributions • Self-serving bias • Personal successes are due to internal factors. • Personal failures are due to external factors. Social Understanding

  6. The Effects of Attribution

  7. The effect of biased attributions: • Blaming the victim • Explaining a victim’s plight or behavior as internal rather than situational. • Just-world hypothesis • Belief that the world is fair and just, so people get what they deserve. • Scapegoating • When you place blame for a personal problem on another person or group Social Understanding

  8. Beliefs or feelings that predispose our reactions • Attitudes guide our behaviors if: • Outside influences are minimal. • The attitude is relevant to the behavior. • We are aware of our attitudes. Attitudes

  9. Actions guide attitudes when: • We agree to small requests and then large requests • Foot-in-the-door phenomenon • We adopt roles to play. • Zimbardo prison study example • Attitudes conflict with actions. • Cognitive dissonance theory Attitudes

  10. Attitudes: Cognitive Dissonance

  11. Prejudice

  12. Prejudice vs. stereotypes vs. discrimination • Prejudice involves stereotypes and discrimination, but not necessarily • Prejudice is often negative, but not necessarily • Stereotypes are overgeneralized • Discrimination is an action, not a belief or view Defining Prejudice

  13. Where does prejudice come from? • Social inequities • In-group bias (and out-group antagonism) • Scapegoating • Just-world hypothesis • Categorization – people have a natural tendency to create categories for things • Vivid cases The Roots of Prejudice

  14. How is prejudice demonstrated? • Overt • Discrimination • Stated negative attitudes • Implicit • Racial associations – people often associate negative words with groups against which they have prejudice and positive words with their own group • Unconscious patronization – people often expect less from those against whom they are prejudiced than for their own group • Lower standards = lower opinion of ability The Roots of Prejudice

  15. Prejudice vs. Privilege • Minority groups (regardless of location) will experience prejudice from the majority • Majority groups experience privilege they do not necessarily recognize The Roots of Prejudice

  16. Contact hypothesis • Coming into social contact with those for whom you hold a prejudice can reduce stereotyped thinking and discrimination • This works when: • The groups are similar socioeconomically • Leaders promote cooperation and interdependence • Contact occurs more individually than in groups • Superordinate goals • Promoting peace by introducing a shared goal between competing/hostile groups Overcoming Prejudice in Groups

  17. Recognize that prejudiced thoughts are wrong. • Internalize new ways of thinking about the group. • Deliberately replace discriminatory behavior with more tolerant behavior. Overcoming Prejudice Individually

  18. Culture

  19. System of subtle and obvious rules established by a group to ensure its survival • David Matsumoto (1999) • Factors that influence culture: • Population density • Climate • Resources (access to) • Technology Defining Culture

  20. Individualism vs. Collectivism • Individualism – places emphasis on personal goals and needs • EX: Most Western cultures • Collectivism – places emphasis on group goals and needs • EX: Most non-Western cultures • Ethnocentrism • Applying your own cultural rules to others Categories of Cultural Perspective

  21. Social Influence

  22. Norms • How norms influence behavior: • Normative social influence • Driven by desire for approval and acceptance • Informational social influence • Driven by desire to be correct Factors of Influence

  23. Solomon Asch • Factors that influenced conformity: • Social support – you need only one person to break conformity • Attraction & commitment to the group • Size of the group – 5-7 people elicit the strongest conformity • Unclear standards of behavior – more conformity occurs when you are unsure of how to behave Conformity

  24. Conformity

  25. Conformity Conformity for important decisions is greater than for unimportant decisions.

  26. Stanley Milgram • Factors that influence obedience: • Mental framework that assumes obedience • Perception of the goals of the situation • Desire to avoid social rejection • Gradual, repetitive escalation of the task • The behavior of the authority figure • More polite usually equals more compliance • Physical and psychological separation from the “learner” Obedience

  27. Obedience

  28. When obedience fails: • Level of compliance with variations of study: • Original study – 65% • Office building setting – 48% • Teacher/learner in same room – 40% • Physical contact – 30% • Phoned-in orders – 23% • Ordinary man giving orders – 20% • Observing rebels – 10% • Free choice of shock level – 3% Obedience

  29. Social loafing • Social facilitation • Deindividuation • Group polarization • Groupthink • Social traps Other Social Influences

  30. Altruism vs. Prosocial behavior • Altruism - helping others with no expectation for personal gain • Prosocial – helping regardless of motive (selfish or not) Helping Behavior

  31. Bystander effect – Darley & Latane • Motivated by the Kitty Genovese murder • Factors that decrease helping: • Presence of others – leads to diffusion of responsibility • Being in a big city or a very small town • Vague or ambiguous situations • When personal costs outweigh perceived benefits Helping Behavior

  32. Bystander effect – Darley & Latane • Factors that increase helping: • “Feel-good, do-good” effect • Feeling guilty • Seeing others willing to help • Believing the person is worthy of help • Knowing how to help • Having a personalized relationship with the victim Helping Behavior

  33. Mere exposure effect • Proximity • Similarity • Symmetry • Self-disclosure • Equity Love & Attraction

  34. Sternberg’s Theory of Love

More Related