1 / 9

Retention Project 2009 – 2011: Joint Academic Upgrading/Test Centre Assessment Pilot

Retention Project 2009 – 2011: Joint Academic Upgrading/Test Centre Assessment Pilot. Lynne Eagan, Academic Upgrading Cindy Thuswaldner , Academic Upgrading Jeff Agate, Test Centre. Purpose of Pilot. Update promotional criteria and assessment methods for AU - Communication courses.

garvey
Download Presentation

Retention Project 2009 – 2011: Joint Academic Upgrading/Test Centre Assessment Pilot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Retention Project 2009 – 2011:Joint Academic Upgrading/Test Centre Assessment Pilot Lynne Eagan, Academic Upgrading Cindy Thuswaldner, Academic Upgrading Jeff Agate, Test Centre

  2. Purpose of Pilot Update promotional criteria and assessment methods for AU - Communication courses. • Review language skills and proficiency levels for course promotion. • Adopt new assessment tools • Use of current assessment technologies • Align assessment tools with post-secondary admission practice

  3. The Academic Upgrading Program • Poor English and Math skills are known barriers to post-secondary success. • The AU – Comm courses develop English skills necessary for success in all post-secondary programs. • The tools used to assess English skills in AU – Comm now line up with assessment tools (i.e., Accuplacer) currently used for admission to Algonquin.

  4. Implementation Process Step 1: Gain consensus among faculty on the Performance Level Descriptors necessary for promotion between the 5 courses of AU Comm. • Reading • Writing

  5. Implementation Process Step 2: Identify suitable Accuplacer tests. • 8 language skills tests available A hybrid of Accuplacer tests and professor-scored writing samples were adopted for promotion criteria.

  6. Implementation Process Step 3: Identification of corresponding test scores for the Performance Level Descriptors necessary for promotion between each course. • Collaborative process • Accuplacer service

  7. Implementation Process Step 4: Scheduling and implementation • Custom AU CommAccuplacer site. • Automatic scoring with placement recommendations . • Results delivered to professors by next class.

  8. Observations • Increased student retention – no longer a barrier. • Promotion assessment more relevant because it mirrors the college admission process • Un-timed - reduces examinee stress • Fewer students getting “stuck” • Re-test period shortened from 90 to 30 days • Current and culturally unbiased assessment • Reflects Algonquin’s commitment to use of current technology • Data is readily available for analysis

  9. Evaluation • 173 AU – Comm students have completed assessment • Increase in number of students promoted from course to course • Speeding up of the promotional process – student success is accelerated

More Related