270 likes | 504 Views
U.S. Turbulence Program Update Presented to: World Meteorological Organization Commission for Basic Systems Expert Team on Aircraft-based Observing Systems First Session Geneva, Switzerland September 10-13, 2013. Presented by.
E N D
U.S. Turbulence Program Update Presented to: World Meteorological Organization Commission for Basic Systems Expert Team on Aircraft-based Observing Systems First Session Geneva, Switzerland September 10-13, 2013 Presented by Tammy FarrarResearch MeteorologistWeather Policy and RequirementsAviation Weather DivisionFederal Aviation Administration
Overview • U.S. Turbulence Program Goals • Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) Algorithm Deployment Status • EDR Thresholds Issue • Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) Development and Enhancements • FAA/Delta Air Lines EDR/GTG Demos • Aviation Turbulence Workshop
U.S. Turbulence Program Goals • To provide real-time turbulence observations and accurate forecasts to air traffic management, flight crews and dispatchers to aid in the avoidance of turbulence • Improve safety • Increase airspace capacity • Enhance operations efficiency (reducing fuel burn and environmental impacts from emissions). • To quantify the benefits of providing such data in order to determine the most cost effective and optimal solutions for integrating turbulence data into flight operations.
Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) Algorithm • UAL: 29 757s (fleet being de-commissioned) • SWA: 1 737-700 (Testing, close to full deployment) • DAL: • 93 737s (mostly -800s with some -700s) • 30 767s (mostly -300s with -400s coming online soon) • KAL: 41 737s soon (in cooperation with DAL) • “Tech Transfer” package in development at NCAR to allow airlines to implement EDR with minimal assistance
EDR Thresholds Issue • NCAR performing on-going statistical comparisons of EDR data with PIREPS from same or nearby aircraft • UAL: 2004-2012, DAL: 2009-2012; thousands of samples • Results indicate the thresholds given in Annex 3 may be too high • Agrees with previously published studies by other researchers
Relation of EDR to PIREPs for medium-sized aircraft (B737,B757) Compared EDR data to nearby PIREPs 3.8 min 70 km 1200 ft PIREP Intensity scaled: 0-smooth, 1-smooth/light, 2 – light, 4 – moderate, 6 – severe, 8 - extreme ICAO thresholds: Light = 0.10 Moderate = 0.40 Severe = 0.70 Suggested new threshold values based on data from this study(median values): Light = 0.06 (<0.1) Moderate = 0.22 (0.1-0.25) Severe = 0.5 (0.26-0.7) Courtesy Julia Pearson
EDR Thresholds Issue • Impacts of Annex changes on cost, operations of member states necessitate good justification and coordination ahead of time • Need for independent peer-review of the study • United States investigating how to best bring this new information to ICAO for the Divisional Meeting scheduled in July 2014
Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG)Development and Enhancements • Current Operational Version • Gridded high resolution (13 km) forecasts of turbulence for FL100-450 • Preflight tool on Operational Aviation Digital Data Service (ADDS) • Includes EDR observations as input • 2014 • Explicit mountain wave turbulence forecasts for all levels Sfc – FL450 • In development • Global GTG • Convectively-induced turbulence • Probabilistic
DAL EDR Proof of Concept Demo • In 2008, under funding from the FAA’s Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP), FAA and DAL launched a cooperative effort to begin integration of EDR and GTG into DAL flight operations • Initial “Proof of Concept” Demo Sep 08-Jan 10 in DAL Operations Control Center (OCC) Dispatch • Access to the EDR and GTG data provided via web-based Experimental ADDS “Turbulence Viewer” display
DAL EDR Proof of Concept Demo • User concerns • Crew/Dispatch: Multiple (sometimes conflicting) data sources, PIREP subjectivity, cabin management, tolerance for risk • ATC: No access to real-time turbulence data in work area, ride reports passed from controller to controller during shift change, “blocked” out altitudes can persist for hours • Flight Attendants: Cabin management/ uncooperative passengers, obligation to continue duties when seatbelt sign is on
DAL EDR Proof of Concept Demo • Conclusions • Demo was limited in scope (product neither directly integrated into DAL applications nor actively used by entire DAL community) • Anecdotal results pointed towards an improvement in dispatcher decision-making process • Quantifying the actual benefits is difficult • Ultimately we need to determine the best means to provide the data real-time for tactical use in the cockpit
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink Demo Follow-on effort to the 2008-10 EDR Proof of Concept Demo with DAL dispatchers and flight planners Quantify the efficiency and capacity benefits to the NAS by providing GTG / EDR information on the flight deck Identify feasibility of providing and displaying GTG / EDR information on the flight deck through existing WiFi link Identify and address human factors considerations associated with providing GTG / EDR information on the flight deck
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink Demo Demonstration Team FAA Weather Research Division FAA Flight Procedures Standards Branch FAA Concept Analysis Branch Delta Airlines National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Basic Commerce & Industries (BCI) Metron Aviation, Inc AvMET Applications, Inc
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink Demo • Phase I - Complete • Jumpseat and/or maintenance flights • Assess WiFi accessibility in cockpit • EDR data conversion (Web Feature Service) • Develop alternative viewer application • Develop display application software • FAA and Delta Safety Risk Assessment • Down-select to single tablet PC (Class I/II EFB) device type for operational demonstrations • iPad selected
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink Demo • Phase II – Nearly Complete • Conduct HITLs to assess the human factors issues associated with the use of the tablet PCs • 10 sessions • Line Check Airmen • Develop final operational demonstration procedures • Develop pilot questionnaire for operational demonstrations • Automated means to capture flight specific data and associated pilot responses • Develop tools to capture sensitivity, cost benefits, and modeling information
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink Demo • Phase III – On-going • Conduct 12 month operational flight demonstrations of the GTG/EDR display with 40 LCAs • Conduct analysis of LCA responses to flight crew questionnaires • Conduct NAS Capacity Benefits Quantification • Weather-ATM Analysis and Visualization Environment (WAVE) tool (AvMetApplications, Inc.) • Historical “weather-centric” ATM analysis tool &research platform • FAA’s Aircraft Situation Display to Industry (ASDI) • Weather, including turbulence • FAA Concept Analysis Branch NAS simulations
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink DemoAnalysis Focus Areas • Workload Impacts • Pilot decision making • Flightcrew – cabin crew • Pilots – ATC • Pilots – dispatch • Safety Impacts • Aircraft cabin management • Environmental Impacts • Altitude deviations to avoid turbulence areas • Fuel requirements (greenhouse emissions) • NAS airspace reallocations
FAA/DAL EDR Uplink DemoPotential Risk / Constraint • Existing Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) prohibiting WiFi use in cockpit of 737NG aircraft • Possible interference with Honeywell Phase III Display Units (DU) • Mitigation procedures identified • LCA, HITL simulations, physical distance and phase of flight restrictions • DAL successfully petitioned FAA for exemption from STCfor use of iPads • DAL also using Microsoft Surface tablets on 757s • FAA seeking modification to SRMD to include 757/767s
Aviation Turbulence Workshop • Hosted by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) August 28-29, 2013, Boulder, CO • Approximately 60 participants • Air Traffic Management Community • US and international operators • Aviation forecasters • General Aviation • US National Transportation Safety Board, FAA Safety • Commercial weather providers • Issues raised: Probabilistic fcst needs, data sharing, convective turbulence, EDR <=> “feels like”, limits of the science, commercial vs GA, global harmonization • Presentations available on ftp://ftp.rap.ucar.edu/pub/sharman/Aviation_Turbulence_Workshop/