340 likes | 446 Views
Factors Affecting the Detection of a Soil Moisture Signal in Field Relative Gravity Measurements. 1 Adam Smith, 1 Jeffrey Walker , 1 Andrew Western, 1 Kevin Ellett, 1 Rodger Grayson, and 2 Matthew Rodell Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia
E N D
Factors Affecting the Detection of a Soil Moisture Signal in Field Relative Gravity Measurements 1Adam Smith, 1Jeffrey Walker, 1Andrew Western, 1Kevin Ellett, 1Rodger Grayson, and 2Matthew Rodell Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia 2. Hydrological Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA http://www.civenv.unimelb.edu.au/~jwalker/data/gsm/hydrograce.html Western Pacific AGU Geophysics Meeting, Hawaii August 2004
Has not yet been demonstrated To give a “low effort” integrated measure of change in terrestrial water storage (deep soil moisture and groundwater) To improve model prediction (via assimilation) of root zone soil moisture To aid the development of methods to utilise GRACE gravity data Measured in Gal; 1 µ Gal ~ 2.5 cm water OR 2%v/v soil moisture over a 2.5m deep layer Why detect soil moisture changes with gravity?
Absolute gravimeters measure gravity by dropping a corner cube Cons Expensive (~ US$300,000) Difficult transportation (dedicated van) Long station occupancy (~ 1/2 day) Field meters have low accuracy (~ 10 µ Gal) Why relative gravity measurements? FG5 FG5-L A10 50 µ Gal 2 µ Gal 10 µ Gal
Relative gravimeters measure gravity by levitating a sphere in a magnetic field, or spring extension Pros Cheap (relatively!) (~ US$50,000) Easier transportation (though still an issue...) Shorter station occupancy (~1 hour) Field meters have high accuracy (~ 3 µ Gal) Why relative gravity measurements? SG G CG-3M 0.01 µ Gal 3 µ Gal 3 µ Gal
Site locations http://www.civenv.unimelb.edu.au/~jwalker/data/oznet
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Drift ~40 µ Gal/day 392 µ Gal/day linear drift already removed
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Drift • Post-transport stabilisation Stabilisation ~25 µ Gal 1.5 hr
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Drift • Post-transport stabilisation • Internal temperature
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Solid earth tides uncorrected ~100 µ Gal corrected
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Solid earth tides • Ocean loading 20min moving average drift removed
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Solid earth tides • Ocean loading • Earthquakes
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Environmental • Meteorological: atmospheric pressure ~ 0.3 µ Gal / mbar
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Environmental • Meteorological: atmospheric pressure air temperature wind speed radiant heating
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Environmental • Hydrological: streamflow groundwater and soil moisture
Factors affecting relative gravity readings • Mechanical • Geodynamical • Environmental • Anthropogenic • Non-systematic mass distribution • Vibrations • Repositioning of gravimeter (1µ Gal/ 3mm elevation)
Anthropogenic factors post transport stabilisation linear drift
Anthropogenic factors car moved right beside meter linear drift
Anthropogenic factors car moved away linear drift
Anthropogenic factors car engine started and left running linear drift
Anthropogenic factors car parked at twice typical distance linear drift
Anthropogenic factors a/c, radio and engine turned off linear drift
Anthropogenic factors enclosure gate opened linear drift
Anthropogenic factors enclosure gate closed linear drift
Anthropogenic factors stopped, relevelled and restarted meter linear drift
Anthropogenic factors tractor drove by & 19 cattle walked up linear drift
Anthropogenic factors removed and repositioned meter linear drift
Conclusions: insignificant factors • Gravimeter internal temperature • Earthquakes (at least in Australia) • Air temperature • Wind speed & direction • Non-systematic mass distribution • Low frequency vibrations
Conclusions: significant factors • Gravimeter drift • Tie to bedrock & repeat sites during survey day Superconducting Gravimeter Bedrock Site
Conclusions: significant factors • Gravimeter drift • Post-transport stabilisation of gravimeter • Take measurement every 2.5 minutes for more than one hour at each site
Conclusions: significant factors • Gravimeter drift • Post-transport stabilisation of gravimeter • Earth tides & ocean loading • Difference field gravity measurements from superconducting gravimeter measurements
Conclusions: significant factors • Gravimeter drift • Post-transport stabilisation of gravimeter • Earth tides & ocean loading • Atmospheric pressure • Measure with handheld barometer and correct gravity to standard atmosphere
Conclusions: significant factors • Gravimeter drift • Post-transport stabilisation of gravimeter • Earth tides & ocean loading • Atmospheric pressure • Levelling • Stable reference point; periodically optically level
Thank You! Acknowledgements: This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP0343778