1 / 10

Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support

Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support. Progress Report to 3 rd meeting of DAC Network on Development Evaluation, Paris, June 2 nd 2005 Mike Hammond, SG Chair (UK) Kate Tench, MG Chair (UK). Presentation Outline. Process Progress Evaluation progress since last DAC Network meeting

gazelle
Download Presentation

Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support Progress Report to 3rd meeting of DAC Network on Development Evaluation, Paris, June 2nd 2005 Mike Hammond, SG Chair (UK) Kate Tench, MG Chair (UK)

  2. Presentation Outline • Process Progress • Evaluation progress since last DAC Network meeting • Final Inception Report • Causality Map & Evaluation Questions • Next steps

  3. 1. Process progress • Review panel: Geske Dijkstra and Mushtaq Khan • Communication strategy: • GBS domain within DAC website • Thematic studies postponed • SECO study on PAFs • Belgium joins MG

  4. 2. Evaluation progress since Nov 04

  5. 3. Final Inception Report • MG confident that IR is now basis for strong evaluation • Causality map: (guide to inquiry) • Reflecting main causality hypotheses • 9 Key evaluation questions • Work plan for the remainder of the study

  6. Causality Map – coverage of questions EQ6 EQ3-5 EQ7 EQ2 EQ8 EQ1

  7. Key Evaluation Questions • 1 Responsiveness to country conditions, government and donor priorities • 2 Contribution to harmonisation and alignment • How efficient, effective and sustainable has been the contribution of PGBS to: • PEM performance • Government ownership, capacity, and accountability • Public policy processes • Macroeconomic performance • Public service delivery performance

  8. Key Evaluation Questions (continued) • Government impact on poverty • Process sustainability • Cross cutting issues: • Gender, Environment, HIV/AIDS, Democracy/Human Rights • Themes – capacity building, private sector, TC, corruption, etc

  9. 6. Next Steps

  10. Thank you… • Any questions… • …Reflections on Cape Town BS Forum - Mike Hammond

More Related