1 / 24

The High Performance Health System

The High Performance Health System. Dov Chernichovsky, Ph.D. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. Objectives of Presentation. Articulate goals and objectives of the health care system Examine (some) performance indicators

gen
Download Presentation

The High Performance Health System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The High Performance Health System Dov Chernichovsky, Ph.D. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

  2. Objectives of Presentation • Articulate goals and objectives of the health care system • Examine (some) performance indicators • Identify structural features of health systems associated with actual and potentially good performance Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  3. Background “The Emerging Paradigm in Health Systems” • Study -- Funded by the Commonwealth Fund -- of the health systems of eight developed nations: Australia, Canada, Germany, France, Israel, The Netherlands, the U.K. and the U.S. • Audience: U.S. policy makers • Approach: technocratic, to the extent possible Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  4. Goals & Objectives of Society Regarding the Healthcare System • Invest in health, balancing between spending on medical care and on other means to enhance health • Objectives: • (Health) • Equity • Cost containment • Efficient production of quality medical care • Client satisfaction Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  5. Health – Life Expectancy(data sources in full paper) Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  6. Equity – Instrumental Rationale • Equitable distribution of medical resources can improve average health • Protection of household non-medical consumption from ‘catastrophic’ medical spending Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  7. Equity - Equitability of Funding Resources Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  8. Cost Containment – (Instr.) Rationale • Helps protect household income and spending • Contributes to lower production costs, competitiveness, and employment Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  9. Cost Containment (a) -Relative Price Increases in Medical Care Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  10. Cost Containment (b) – Real (General Price Index) Per Capita Growth in Health Spending Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  11. Production Efficiency - Rationale • More resources for quality care and other uses Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  12. Production Efficiency – Spending Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  13. Client Satisfaction – Client Desire for Reform Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  14. Preliminary Conclusions • Systems in-between the U.K. and U.S.A do better in balancing health system goals • They are more relevant to the U.S.A., anyhow Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  15. Principles for Success • Universal entitlement • Centralized funding of care -- not necessarily by the state budget -- for • Equity • Cost containment • Competition and choice– not necessarily in private markets -- for • Efficient production of quality care • Client satisfaction Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  16. State Regulation Funding Pool, Real or Virtual Contracting First Market Non-state Fund holding, OMCC Institutions: Sickness Funds, HMOs, etc. Purchasing Second Market Providers Apparently Successful Dual Internal Market Structure Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  17. Fully Centralized K Z ↑ OMCC & Provision ↓ Transitional Economies Transitional poor nations The U.S & poor nations A P Competitive Out of Pocket, Private ← Funding → General Revenues, Fully Public Reform Directions Europe Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  18. Basic Features of Dual Internal Market • Enables multiple Lines of accountability • Enables pluralism and choice in • Form of entitlement • Content of entitlement • Enables client empowerment vis a vis state, on the one hand, and providers, on the other Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  19. Fundraising & Allocation OMCC Institution OMCC Institutions2 Providers Finance Accountability Multiple Lines of Accountability Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  20. Model A Model B OMCC OMCC Primary Care Primary Care Primary care Professional care and hospitalization Professional care and hospitalization Model C Model D OMCC Primary care OMCC Primary care Professional care and hospitalization Professional care and hospitalization Multiple Forms of Care Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  21. Expansion of Entitlement Private entitlement and finance Discretionary public entitlement, financed by a pre-set portion of public-based finance Core public entitlement – common to all groups Multiple Content of Entitlement Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  22. Key Function & Institution Organization and Management of Care Consumption (OMCC) / Competing Budget Holder

  23. Basic References • Chernichovsky, D. 1995. “Health System Reforms in Industrialized Economies; An Emerging Paradigm”. The Milbank Quarterly Vol. 73, no. 3: 339-372. • Chernichovsky, D. 2002. “Pluralism, Choice, and the Sate in the Emerging Paradigm in Health Systems.”The Milbank Quarterly. Vol. 80, No.1:5-40. Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

  24. Thanks Dov Chernichovsky - Draft

More Related