1 / 27

Future Colliders Why do we need them? And which one do we need?

Future Colliders Why do we need them? And which one do we need?. Albert De Roeck CERN. VLHC. Future Machines. Introduction Restrict to machines at the high energy frontier …as a warm–up for the round table discussion Future Hadron Machines LHC SLHC VLHC Future Lepton Machines

genero
Download Presentation

Future Colliders Why do we need them? And which one do we need?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Future Colliders Why do we need them?And which one do we need? Albert De Roeck CERN VLHC

  2. Future Machines • Introduction • Restrict to machines at the high energy frontier …as a warm–up for the round table discussion • Future Hadron Machines • LHC • SLHC • VLHC • Future Lepton Machines • TeV e+e- LC Hot topic these days! • Multi-TeV e+e+ LC • Others (neutrino factories, muon colliders) • Skip due lack of time…Apologies!

  3. SM SUSY Physics case for new High Energy Machines Understand the mechanism Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Discover physics beyond the Standard Model Reminder: The Standard Model - tells us how but not why (contains 19 parameters!) 3 flavour families? Mass spectra? Hierarchy? - needs fine tuning of parameters to level of 10-30 ! - has no connection with gravity - no unification of the forces at high energy If a Higgs field exists: - Supersymmetry - Extra space dimensions If there is no Higgs below ~ 700 GeV - Strong electroweak symmetry breaking around 1 TeV Other ideas: more gauge bosons/quark & lepton substructure, Little Higgs models… See R. Barbieri Most popular extensions these days

  4. The Next Collider: LHC Dipoles arriving at CERN… …and in a few years Production of components well on track Some problems with the QRL/Cryogenics, but delay should be recovered Plan still for first collisions in 2007 Commissioning will take time (~months)  Luminosities at start will be low and then gradually move to 0.5-2.1033cm2 s-1

  5. The CMS & ATLAS Experiments • Major Challenge • Event pile up ~23 evts/bx @ high lumi • ~100 000 000 readout channels • Size of 1 event • 1 000 000 bytes • Trigger selection • Total Event Rate 40 MHz 100 Hz • Radiation, stability, calibration… CMS: ~2350 people/~159 institutes • Construction of the experiments progressing well (some problems; but being tackled) •  Commissioning:in situ calibrations • allignements, synchronization etc. •  On schedule to be ready for • physics by 2007. • Maybe with some reduced acceptance

  6. Physics Landscape by 2010? • Hence the future begins in 2007 (2008) • Unless advanced by results from low energy experiments (g-2…), Tevatron, EGRET… • LHC should have told us, say, by 2010 (with ~30 fb-1) • Whether a light (or heavy) Higgs exist ..unveil the EWSB mechanism • Whether the world is or could be (low energy) supersymmetric • Whether we can produce dark matter in the lab • Whether there are more space time dimensions, micro-black holes… • Whether it is all different than what we thought • Whether there is nothing strikingly new found in its reach…unlikely! • Theory •  Either at least one Higgs exisits with mass below 1 TeV, or new • phenomena (strong EWSB?) set on in the TeV region • New physics prefers the TeV scale (Hierarchy problem, fine tunning) but not fully guaranteed

  7. What do we know about the Higgs? Probability for mH combining direct and indirect information LHC: SM Higgs with 10 fb-1 ~1 good year of data taking •  Light Higgs preferred by EW data •  Light Higgs needed for SUSY (<135 GeV) • Caution … some recent developments •  Higgs + higher dimensional operators • ( Higgs could be heavy) •  Higgsless models in Extra Dimensions scenarios • EW fit criticism…  A light Higgs is not guaranteed 114.4 < Mhiggs < 237 GeV

  8. LHC: low scale SUSY discovery • If low scale SUSY: then large production of squarks/gluinos at the LHC • LSP responsible for dark matter? Comparison with WMAP to within 15% Discovery reach 300 fb-1: 2.5-3 TeV 30 fb-1: 2 TeV already

  9. Upgrades of the LHC J. Strait exercise: Not an “official” LHC plot Possible lumi scenario If startup is as smooth as assumed here: Around 2013: simple continuation becomes less exciting Time for an upgrade?

  10. 95% CL14 TeV 300 fb-114 TeV 3000 fb-128 TeV 300 fb-128 TeV 3000 fb-1  (TeV) 40 60 60  85 The LHC upgrade: SLHC Time to think of upgrading the machine if wanted in ~10 years Two options presently discussed/studied • Higher luminosity ~1035cm-2 s-1 (SLHC) • Needs changes in machine and particularly in the detectors •  Start change to SLHC mode some time 2013-2016? •  Collect ~3000 fb-1/experiment in 3-4 years data taking. • Higher energy? • LHC can reach s = 15 TeV with present magnets (9T field) • s of 28 (25) TeV needs ~17 (15) T magnets  R&D needed! LHC project report 626 hep-ph/0204087 Extended search reach for both upgrades: Example Contact Interaction Scale

  11. q q VL VL VL q VL q Some Examples with Increased Luminosity MSSM Heavy Higgs reach If no Higgs,expect strong VLVL scattering (resonant or non-resonant) Maybe difficult for LHC (eg. perhaps only 3-5 effect for WW scattering with 100 fb-1) 3000 fb-1/5 3000fb-1/95% CL Heavy Higgs observable region increased by ~100 GeV.

  12. LHC Upgrades The LHC luminosity upgrade to 1035 cm-2s-1 •  Extend the LHC discovery mass range by 25-30% (SUSY,Z’,,EDs) •  Higgs self-coupling (20-30%) •  Rear decays: H, Z, top decays… • Improved Higgs coupling ratios,… • In general: SLHC looks like giving a good physics return for modest cost. •  Get the maximum out of the (by then) existing machine •  Will extend the LHC mass range by factor 1.5 •  Is generally more powerful than a luminosity upgrade •  Needs a new machine, magnet& machine R&D, and will not be cheap  It will be a challenge for the experiments!  Needs detector R&D starting now Tracking, electronics, trigger,endcaps,…  CMS and ATLAS started working groups  Aim: be ready around 2013 An LHC energy upgrade to s ~ 28 TeV

  13. VLHC: Very Large Hadron Collider http://vlhc.org Tunnel of 233 km (E.G could be somewhere near FNAL) Stage 1: 40 TeV collider with “cheap” 2T field magnets L=1034cm-2 s-1 Stage 2: 200 TeV collider with superconducting magnets. L=2.1034cm-2 s-1 Magnet & Vacuum R&D required (and ongoing) Detectors with good tracking up to 10 TeV (increase B,L), calorimeter coverage || up to 6-7, good linearity up to 10 TeV, harsh forward radiation

  14. Why a VLHC? • Probe directly the region 10-100 TeV • Unlike for the TeV scale, no clear preference today for specifc energy-scale in the multi-10 TeV region. • However indirect evidence for New Physics at 10-100 TeV could emerge from LHC and first LC  compelling arguments for a direct exploration of this range. • eg. if MH ~ 115 GeV  New physics at  < 105-106 GeV  A VLHC can probe directly a large part of this range Hambye-Riesselmann Effective potential blow-up Unstable EW vacuum The importance and role of such a machine can be appreciated better after LHC(/LC) data will be fully understood  revisite during the next decade

  15. Linear Colliders USA Europe 33 km Japan GLC International collaborations TESLA/NLC/GLC: 90 GeV 1 TeV with 35-70 MV/m CERN: CLIC Two-Beam acceleration scheme to reach >3TeV with 150 MV/m

  16. Machine Parameters Table from ILC-TRC (2003) http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg//ilc-trc/ilc-trchome.html • International LC scope document •  500 GeV upgradeable to ~1 TeV,  500 fb-1 in 4 years •  2 interaction regions,  80% electron polarization •  Energy flexibility between √s = 90-500 GeV • Future: possibility of γγ, e-e-, e+ polarization, Giga –Z  TeV e+e- Linear Collider

  17. Warm/Cold Technologies Warm: NLC/GLC Cold: TESLA CLIC beam structure similar to the warm case Choice has impact on detector R&D/choice (e.g. time stamping…) We can built at most one collider: which technology to choose?  International Technology Recommendation Panel (ITRP) to make a recommendation on the technology choice  Next ITRP meeting: Korea 11-13 August (Tomorrow) ??Perhaps a decision announced at ICHEP04 in Beijing??

  18. LC is Moving Forward Strongly! Study groups of ACFA, ECFA, HEPAP The next large accelerator-based project of particle physics should be a linear collider US DOE Office of Science Future Facilities Plan:LC is first priority mid-term new facility for all US Office of Science Major Funding Agencies Regular meetings concerning LC ICFA (February 2004) reaffirms its conviction that the highest priority for a new machine for particle physics is a linear electron-positron collider with an initial energy of 500 GeV, extendible up to about 1 TeV, with asignificant period of concurrent running with the LHC LCWS04 Paris(April 2004) publication of the document “understanding matter, space and time” by 2600 physicists, in support of a linear collider EUROTEV selected by EC 9 MEuro for R&D for a LC Very sizable community wants a e+e- Linear Collider

  19. A LC is a Precision Instrument • Clean e+e- (polarized intial state, controllable s for hard scattering • Detailed study of the properties of Higgs particles mass to 0.03%, couplings to 1-3%, spin & CP structure, total width (6%) factor 2-5 better than LHC/measure couplings in model indep. way • Precision measurements of SUSY particles properties, i.e. slepton masses to better than 1%, if within reach • Precision measurements a la LEP (TGC’s, Top and W mass) • Large indirect sensitivity to new phenomena (eg WLWL scattering) LC will very likely play important role to disentangle the underlying new theory

  20. LC: Few More Examples Understanding SUSY High accuracy of sparticle mass measurements relevant for reconstruction of SUSY breaking mechanism Dark Matter LC will accurately measure m and couplings, i.e. Higgsino/Wino/Bino content  Essential input to cosmology & searches LC will make a prediction of DMh²~ 3% (SPS1a) A mismatch with WMAP/Planck would reveal extra sources of DM (Axions, heavy objects)  Quantum level consistency: MH(direct)= MH(indirect)? sin2W~10-5 (GigaZ), MW ~ 6 MeV (+theory progress)  MH (indirect) ~ 5% 1/M GeV-1 Gaugino mass parameters G. Blair et al F. Richard/SPS1a

  21. What if no new particles in LC range? Precision measurements of the top quark, e.g top mass! Compare mW and sin2eff experimental accuracy with theoretical prediction  theoretical consistency! Top mass uncertainty is a limiting factor Mtop=175 GeV 100 fb-1 per point ~ similar to theoretical HO uncertainties, 5x better than exp. precision Precision indirect measurements (TGCs, Z’, strong EWSB...) e.g Compares indirect (LC) Z’ searches with direct LHC Note: some indirect searches also possible at the LHC e.g. ZKK indirect sensitivity up to 15-20 TeV for SLHC LC has large reach for indirect measurements

  22. LHC/LC Complementarity http://www.ipp.dur.ac.uk/~georg/lhclc/ •  The complementarity of the LHC and LC results has been studied • by a working group and has produced a huge document • (>450 pages, G. Weiglein principal editor, finishing stage…) • Working group contains members from LHC and LC community + theorists • Most meetings at CERN (one in the US) Conclusion: lot to gain for analysis of BOTH machines if there is a substantial overlap in running time. Example: at LHC masses of the measured particles are strongly correlated with the mass of the lightest neutralino squarks sbottom sleptons Largely improve LHC mass measurements when LC 10 value is used 1 1 LSP 1

  23. LC Time Scales R. Heuer LCWS04 ILCSC Road Map 2004 technology recommendation(confirmed by ITRP) Establish Global Design Initiative / Effort (GDI/E) 2005 CDR for Collider (incl. first cost estimate) 2007 TDR for Collider 2008 site selection 2009/2010 construction could start (if budget approved) First collisions in 2015? LC the first real “global machine” in HEP?

  24. CLIC: a Multi-TeV Linear Collider  Two beam acceleration presently only feasible way to reach multi-TeV region  Principle demonstrated with CTF2 CLIC: aim for 3 TeV (5 TeV) LC •  CERN: accelerate CLIC R&D support to • evaluate the technology by 2009/2010 with • extra external contributions • CLIC collaboration. • FAQs: • CLIC technology O(5-6) years behind TeV class LCs • CLIC can operate from 90 GeV 3 (5) TeV . Physics case for CLIC documented in a new CERN yellow report CERN-2004-005 (June)

  25. CLIC: Examples of the Large Reach Eur.Phys. J C33 273 (2004) E.g.: Contact interactions: Sensitivity to scales up to 100-400 TeV (1 year of data) E.g. Supersymmetry # sparticles that can be detected Expect higher precision at LC vs LHC

  26. Summary: Indicative Physics Reach Ellis, Gianotti, ADR hep-ex/0112004+ few updates Units are TeV (except WLWL reach) Ldt correspond to 1 year of running at nominal luminosity for 1 experiment • PROCESS LHCSLHC VLHCVLHC LC LC • 14 TeV14 TeV 28 TeV 40 TeV 200 TeV 0.8 TeV 5 TeV • 100 fb-11000 fb-1 100 fb-1 100 fb-1100 fb-1 500 fb-1 1000 fb-1 • Squarks 2.534 5200.4 2.5 • WLWL24 4.5 7 18 6 30 • Z’ 56811 358†30† • Extra-dim (=2) 91215 25 655-8.5† 30-55† • q* 6.57.5 9.5 13 750.8 5 • compositeness 3040 40 50100 100 400 TGC () 0.00140.0006 0.0008 0.0003 0.0004 0.00008 † indirect reach (from precision measurements) Don’t forget: (much) better precision at an e+e- machine

  27. Conclusion • LHC will be the next high energy collider • It will unveil the EWSB mechanism • It will probe the TeV scale for new physics • SHLC (luminosity upgrade) will give good return for a modest investment • VLHC is still for the far future • A LC will be the next proposed machine/it will complement LHC perfectly • A LC collider is a precision instrument • LC community has built up large momentum • TESLA and NLC/GLC technologies essentially ready choice? • Construction could start around 2009/2010  collisions in 2015? • CLIC (3 TeV) aims to demonstrate feasibility of the technology by 2009/2010 • Is 500 (1000) GeV the optimal energy reach for the machine? Will certainly be addressed in the light of the LHC data by 2009/2010 In any case: exciting times ahead !!

More Related