1 / 17

Scaling up a Josephson Junction Quantum Computer

Scaling up a Josephson Junction Quantum Computer. John Martinis, UCSB. Basic elements of quantum computer have been demonstrated 4-5 qubit algorithms within reach 8-10 likely With improvement in coherence, further scaling up.

genero
Download Presentation

Scaling up a Josephson Junction Quantum Computer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scaling up a Josephson JunctionQuantum Computer John Martinis, UCSB • Basic elements of quantum computer • have been demonstrated • 4-5 qubit algorithms within reach • 8-10 likely • With improvement in coherence, • further scaling up

  2. Quantized Voltages and Currentsof Microfabricated Circuit Qubit control port readout port 100mm (old NIST design) control port Josephson Junction forms non-linear LC resonator

  3. U(d) E2 Josephson-Junction Qubit (1) State Preparation Wait t > 1/g10for decay to |0> E1 • |1> E0 • |0> dIdc(t) (2) Qubit logic with current bias I = Idc + dIdc(t) + Imwc(t)cosw10t+ Imws(t)sinw10t I mwc I mws (3) State Measurement: DU(Idc+dIp) Fast single shot – high fidelity 3 ns pulse • |1> : tunnel • |0> : no tunnel

  4. X Y Imw Z Ip Reset Compute Meas.Readout time If Repeat 1000x Probability 0,1 Is 1 0 Vs Is Vs If Sequencer & Timer 300K V source ~10ppm noise ExperimentalApparatus rf filters fiber optics V source Ip ~10ppm noise Z, measure Imw X, Y I-Q switch mwaves 20dB 20dB ~5 ns pulses 4K 20mK mw filters 20dB 10ns 3ns 30dB

  5. x/2 x/2 Ramsey time y x/2 x/2 Echo time x lifetime time Qubit Characterization Rabi Meas. time 1 T1 ~400ns 0 P1 T~100ns 1 t~350ns 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 time [ns]

  6. |1> |0> Single Qubit Gate Errors: Measurement Errors nothing or -pulse Iw 7.22 GHz measure Iz Tunneling Prob. 8 ns 3 ns Spectroscopy thy: 96.6% exp: 85.0% TLS leakage Imeas / Ic measurement 6.75 GHz Error Budget thy: 96.6% exp: 89.5% • |1> (misidentified as |0>) • 4.5% splitting at 7GHz • 3-5% other splittings • 1% T1 during measurement • |0> (misidentified as |1>) • 3.4% stray tunneling

  7. Single-Qubit Gate Errors: Limited by T1 X X measure Iw separation Iz P1 [%] 8 ns 8 ns pulse non-linearity T1 decay Vary the time between pi pulses to separate gate fidelity from decoherence due to T1 decay. 4% error at separation 11 ns 3.4% stray tunneling pulse separation [ns] double -  error: 4% single-qubit gate fidelity: 98% (limited by T1) Direct measure of probability Checks on measurement & p-gates

  8. Coupled Qubits Straightforward to implement: simple coupling tunable fast readout simultaneous measurement Cc C Cc On Resonance: 11 01 10 00

  9. p t real imag S 11 01 10 Entangling 2-Qubit Gate (Universal) p 00 100 80 |00> 60 Probability of |01>, |10>, or |11> [%] Entanglement of Formation 0.2635 ebit 40 20 t [ns] 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

  10. Process Tomography of 2-Qubit Gate Re [c] Im [c] Fidelity: Tr(cthycexp) = 0.427 DATA T1 = 450ns CM = 8% CuW= 5% vis = 85% g/π = 20MHz SIM

  11. On-Off Coupling to TLS Memory • Strong interaction with TLS (S = 40MHz) • Long-lived TLS is quantum memory “on” excite qubit off-resonance Frequency • On-Off coupling with change in bias z-pulse into resonance “off” Tswap ~ 12ns Bias X interact with TLS measure P1 8% time [ns] off TLS on 16 ns time time [s] T1,TLS ~ 1.2s X swap hold swap P1 off TLS on 16 ns 12 ns time 12 ns time [s]

  12. Quantum Memory with Process Tomography init store mem load TLS 16 ns 16ns 12 ns 12 ns 1 2 3 Process tomography: identity operation dominates process Fidelity: Tr(thymeas) = 79% 1 – Initialize Create states over the entire Bloch sphere. 2 – Store Swap state into TLS. Qubit now in ground state. 3 – Load After holding for 16ns, swap again to retrieve state from TLS.

  13. Summary and Future Prospects • Demonstrated basic qubit operations with fidelity • Initialize, gate operations, simultaneous measurement • 10 to 50 logic operations Tomography conclusively demonstrates entanglement • Decoherence mechanism understood • Optimize dielectrics, expect future improvements • Working on Bell violation, advanced CNOT gates (+ tunable) • Simulating 4-5 qubit algorithms • Scale-up infrastructure designed (“brute force” to ~100 qubits) Very optimistic about 4 -10 qubit quantum computer

  14. detuning  (both pulses) X  measure Iw Iz 8 ns 8 ns Single-Qubit Gate Errors: Tomography Check experiment Goal: Measure fidelity of pi-pulse (longest single-qubit gate) separately from measurement errors. Idea: Two pi-pulses bring state back to |0>, where the only measurement error is stray tunneling. Remaining error is due to pi-pulses only. Tomography Check: On resonance, phase of second pulse has no effect, as expected for pi-pulses. detuning [MHz] P1 phase  [/] theory  P1

  15. Xp |2> Errors from Fast Pulses t (FWHM) Measure Two State Errors Zoom in on 2-state errors for many pulse lengths w21 w10 8ns pulse power 4ns frequency w21 w10 Gaussian pulses: Minimum width in time and frequency

  16. Xp Xp p - p Pulses Give Low Background & Error Filtering High Power Spectroscopy Qubit Two Photon |2> Error tdelay Measure |2> State 200MHz 5 ns 4P2-error Ramsey Fringe Filtering of |2> state Delay time tdelay[ns]

  17. Error vs. Gaussian Pulse Width S-curve 10-4 p-p FT theory Spectrum analyzer Quantum simulation

More Related