260 likes | 415 Views
Exploring the human mind: the perspective of natural sciences . 7th International interdisciplinary seminar Ponte di Legno, Italy 31-12-2003. A framework for con sciousness Crick & Koch, Nature neuroscience , 2003. AD Manazza, MD. Consciousness: -self-consciousness
E N D
Exploring the human mind: the perspective of natural sciences 7th International interdisciplinary seminar Ponte di Legno, Italy 31-12-2003 A framework for consciousness Crick & Koch, Nature neuroscience, 2003 AD Manazza, MD
Consciousness: -self-consciousness - emotions -aspects of reality (redness of red, houseness of house) They define the front-head approach to the problem of qualia “fruitless” and, in the mean time, they statue that no one ever explained it successfully, although without demonstrating it. General strategy
They try to correlate the neural correlates of one, single conscious perception: the minimal set of neuronal events that gives rise to a specific aspect of a perception (NCC). They study: -Alert macaque: single neurons for a long time -Humans: visual psychology General strategy
A good f. is one that sounds reasonably plausible, relative to available scientific data. It often contains unstated aassumptions. It’s a useful guide for further studies. The authors’ framework
The visual system is highly evolved, learnes from experience, has got a complex epigenetic control. Neurons higher in the hierarchy will respond to larger and more complex features than lower neurons (receptive field). projection neuron reception A preamble on the cortex
Both receptive and projective field are dynamic and can be modified with experience Neurons detect most common input correlations and modify themselves to respond to these signals A preamble on the cortex
We thus have a semi-hierarchical structure of the visual cortex Many, different stimuli can be merged or separately analaysed Correlation Ib Correlation Ia – correlation Ia Stimulus stimulus stimulus stimulus A preamble on the cortex
The front of the brain is “staring at” the back, where sensory data arrive; We’re not conscious of our thoughts, but only of their sensory representation; “ To be conscious of a thought” is quite odd a concept, not previously shown or demonstrated, thus the two sentences are not easily understandable. 1-The homunculus
Sensory stimuli generate: -rapid acting responses, stereotyped “cortical reflexes”; -slow acting responses, requiring full consciousness. This is a brand new concept of reflex, lacking anatomical and physiological explanation, and invading the philosophical field. 2- the “zombie” mode
“Cortical reflexes” use dorsal parietal stream, their stimuli move forward Conscious activity uses ventral parietal stream, to and fro the parietal cortex and it depends on different visual areas. 2b- the “zombie” mode
Transient networks of connected neurons elicit or inhibit their neighbours activity; Networks may vary in size & functions, though using the same neurons. 3- Coalitions
Explicit and conscious representation need certain areas activity; Single visual columns send signals to different parietal areas. E.g. achromatopsia, prosopoagnosia, achinetopsia Observed human damages are usually large, and monkeys aren't usually interactive 4- Representation
The first signal travels rapidly to the frontal cortex, then backwards; the resulting back signal may elicit attention. 5- Higher levels first
There may be different kind of inputs: -Driving -Modulating This is actually a working hypothesis. 6- Neuron interconnections
The vision process is, somehow, the result of snapshots: the “digital” vision. Snapshot half-life is not measurable. 7- Snapshots 7b- Snapshots
Consciousness level is reached when neural networks fire above a certain threshold; Ca++levels may fall down slowly, and therefore maintain network activity. 7b- Snapshots [Ca++] time
Attention: top-down or bottom-up, it requires a biasing activity between different signals Thalamus could be the anatomical seat 8- attention and binding
Binding means putting together different aspects of an object: its colour, shape, movement,… If it’s a novel association, it also requires previous nodes collaboration 8b- attention and binding
Synchronized firing Burst of firing Signal oscillation First arrived, best served 9- Styles of firing ν time
P. consists of the effects of the neural network as a whole: its firing will influence a cohort of peripheral neurons, and these ones should help solve the problem of meaning How does the brain know what the firing represents? Confusion between brain and human being 10- Penumbra
“Zombie modes show that not all motor outputs from the cortex are carried out consciously. Consciousness depends on certain coalitions that rest on the properties of very elaborate neural networks.” It’s just a bit simplifying. General remarks
“Discovering the temporal sequence of such activities, will help us to move from correlation to causation”. POST HOC, ERGO PROPTER HOC General remarks-2
Visual illusions and binocular rivalry Anatomy of cortex areas, their genetic markers, cells interconnections Fast time / small groups / simultaneous / ≠areas Seizure onset studies on humans (epilepsy), or neurosurgical interventions Future experiments
Thalamus role Basal ganglia role Brain stem activity Frontal cortex hierarchy Is consciousness peculiar to men or to their nervous systems? Omissions