1 / 7

People NCPs Training on H2020, Brussels, 21.11.2013

People NCPs Training on H2020, Brussels, 21.11.2013. Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Award criteria. Policy Officers DG EAC.C3. Award criteria: Key features. In line with all other programmes in H2020 Set out in Art. 14 of the Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation 3 award criteria :

genica
Download Presentation

People NCPs Training on H2020, Brussels, 21.11.2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. People NCPsTraining on H2020, Brussels, 21.11.2013 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Award criteria Policy OfficersDG EAC.C3 Education and Culture

  2. Award criteria: Key features • In line with all other programmes in H2020 • Set out in Art. 14 of the Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation • 3 award criteria: • Excellence (50% weighting) • Impact (30% weighting) • Implementation (20% weighting) • NIGHT will use criteria of all H2020 Coordination & Support Actions • All elements of the criteria similar for all MSCA, identical wording for impact towards the programme objectives • More clarifications in the Part B of the Guide for Applicants for each action Education and Culture

  3. Award criteria: Key features • Evaluation scores will be awarded for each of the criteria, not for their individual elements • Each criterion scored from 0 to 5 - decimal points will be given: • 0 - The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete information • 1 - Poor. The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses. • 2 - Fair. While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses. • 3 - Good. The proposal addresses the criterion well, although improvements would be necessary. • 4 - Very good. The proposal addresses the criterion very well, although certain improvements are still possible. • 5 - Excellent. The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor. • Total score subject to a threshold of 70% Education and Culture

  4. Award criteria: ITN Education and Culture

  5. Award criteria: IF Education and Culture

  6. Award criteria: RISE Education and Culture

  7. Award criteria: COFUND Education and Culture

More Related