160 likes | 327 Views
Magnetic Field Decay and Core Temperature of Magnetars, Normal and MS pulsars. Shuang-Nan Zhang 张双南 1 Yi Xie 谢祎 2 1. Institute of High Energy Physics 2. National Astronomical Observatories of China. Evolutionary study of pulsars on p-pdot diagram. B decay required?. Han, J.L, 1997, A&A.
E N D
Magnetic Field Decay and Core Temperature of Magnetars, Normal and MS pulsars Shuang-Nan Zhang 张双南1 Yi Xie 谢祎2 1. Institute of High Energy Physics 2. National Astronomical Observatories of China
Evolutionary study of pulsars on p-pdot diagram B decay required? Han, J.L, 1997, A&A
Indirect Evidence for B decay? Han, J.L. (1997): power-law decay with “gene”: t0~B0 dependence
Direct Evidence for B Decay Magnetars do not cross death line: normal radio pulsar mechanism works here? Consistent with recent detection of radio magnetars (talks by Manchester and Yuan in this meeting). magnetars Normal pulsars Best fits ms pulsars
P-Pdot or B-Age? Pdot P Derived quantities using B-dipole radiation model (OK if not overwhelmed by pulsar wind loss), but direct comparison with B-decay model. Direct observables: But all tracks calculated using B-dipole radiation model, and indirect comparison with B-decay model.
Inclination angle decay? • Then the observed B-decay may be in fact an illusion of inclination angle decay (Faucher-Giguère & Kaspi 2006; Weltevrede & Johnston 2008). • However, B-decay by 100 times for each kind of pulsars is difficult for inclination angle decay alone. • A better and more physical model required. Magnetic-Dipole radiation model:
B Decay Model: Heyl & Kulkarni, 1998, ApJL The dominant term
~ Constant Core Temperatures of NSs magnetars normal pulsars ms pulsars
All observed P and Pdot paired randomly All observed P Best fits of real pulsars All observed Pdot General trend of the observed distributions!
Each class of observed P and Pdot paired randomly Model for real pulsars Very similar to the observed distributions!
Completely simulated data: Gaussian distributions Input parameters Model for real pulsars Still very similar to the observed distributions!
Completely simulated data: Not a surprise! Model for real pulsars B-Dipole radiation: Simulated data follow model precisely! For each type of pulsars P=const Ambipolar B-Decay model (T=const):
Why is the Pdot so small for all pulsars? • B-dipole radiation • But why the observed Pdot is so small? • Ambipolar diffusion B-decay with constant core temperature • P~constant Pdot must be very small! • This is a natural prediction of the above ambipolar diffusion B-decay model.
Summary and Open Questions • No magnetar cross the pulsar’s death line • Normal pulsar radiation mechanism? • All NSs show clear evidence for B-deday • Agrees with ~constant Tcore ambipolar diffusion B-decay model well • Heating by B-decay energy and NS cooling by neutrino and emission in ~equilibrium for all pulsars? • The model naturally predicts very small Pdot as observed • Core temperature: Magnetars 2x108 K, Normal pulsars 2x107 K, ms pulsars 1x105 K • Different populations at birth?