1 / 23

Smart Specialisation Platform at JRC - IPTS

Smart Specialisation Platform at JRC - IPTS. Inger Midtkandal JRC IPTS - S3 Platform Warsaw , June 2012. Smart Specialisation Platform, tools and activities. What is the S3 Platform? The RIS 3 guide Tools for assessment and learning. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu.

george
Download Presentation

Smart Specialisation Platform at JRC - IPTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Smart Specialisation Platformat JRC - IPTS Inger Midtkandal JRC IPTS - S3 Platform Warsaw, June 2012

  2. Smart Specialisation Platform, tools and activities • What is the S3 Platform? • The RIS 3 guide • Tools for assessment and learning

  3. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu • Designed to assist regions and Member States in developing RIS3 strategies • Launched in June 2011 • Managed by a team established at JRC-IPTS in Seville • Monitored by a Steering Team incl. DG REGIO, RTD, ENTR, EAC, INFSO, SANCO, AGRI, CLIMA • Input from a Mirror Group of European high-level experts and network representatives

  4. Support to regions in preparing RIS3 Peer Review workshops Informal assessment of RIS3 Analytical and scientific based advice Thematic working groups RIS3 Methodological Guide Seminars/events in Member States and EU Macro-regions Website

  5. S3 Platform 65 registered regions by June 2012 POLSKA Dolny Śląsk (Lower Silesia)LubelskieLubuskieMazovieckiePodkarpackieŚwiętokrzyskieWojewództwo Podlaskie ROMÂNIA Vest SLOVAKIA Bratislava

  6. The RIS3 Guide PART I: THE POLICY CONTEXT PART II: THE RATIONALE PART III: RIS3 DESIGN IN A NUTSHELL Annex I – A step-by-step approach to RIS3 design Annex II – Delivery instruments and horizontal approaches Annex III – Guidance for expert assessment Edited by JRC IPTS in association with DG REGIO and with contributions from: • D. Foray, P. McCann, J. Goddard, K. Morgan, C. Nauwelaers, R. Ortega, Commission officials from various DGs and S3 Platform team Available on the S3 Platform webpage http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home

  7. What is a RIS3? (research and innovation strategy for smart specialisation) Buildingon the past • Widespread experience of national/regional innovation strategies in the framework of the EU Cohesion Policy • Achieved greater co-operation among private and public stakeholders and better communication between technology providers and clients Breaking with the past • Lack of international and trans-regional perspective • Not in tune with the industrial and economic fabric of regions • Too narrow vision of innovation • Picking the winner syndrome • The best performing regions were just copied

  8. RIS3 guide - Key steps for developing a RIS3 Step 1 – Analysis of regional context/potential Step 2 – Governance Step 3 – Vision for the future Step 4 – Selection of priorities Step 5 – Policy mix Step 6 – Monitoring and evaluation 8

  9. Step 1 – Analysis of regional context and potential for innovation (I) • A broader definition of innovation, not just RTD-oriented • Assess existing regional assets • Identify regional competitive advantage • Detect emerging niches for smart specialisation • Combine methods (e.g. regional profiling, SWOT approach; surveys)

  10. Step 1 – Analysis of regional context – looking out – and potential for innovation (II) Outward-looking Analysis: • Assess region’s positioning within the EU • Beware of global companies and value chains • Flows of knowledge and skills • Avoid ‘blind’ duplication, discover possibilities for collaboration • Combine methods (e.g. studies; interviews; interregional work groups)

  11. Step 1 – Analysis of regional context and potential for innovation (III) Analysis of entrepreneurial dynamics and identification of future opportunities: • Different types of actors • Spirit of the entrepreneurial environment • Involvement of entrepreneurial actors in the regional economy • Firms, but also Universities, Technology Centers, Venture Capitalists, Regional Development Agencies.. • Identify economic differentiation potential • Combine methods • consultation with firms, clusters; technological audits; foresight studies

  12. Step 2 – Governance: Ensuring participation and ownership Wider engagement of stakeholders: • Include the demand-side perspective  Quadruple Helix • Collaborative leadership • Boundary spanning individuals and organisations • Dedicated Steering Group/ Knowledge Leadership Group, Management Team, Working groups

  13. Step 3 – Developing an overall vision of the region’s future Shared vision of the region’s potential and main directions for its international positioning: • Formulate different scenarios based on analyses and debate where your region wants to go • Produce a positive tension towards the future • Guarantee long-term engagement of stakeholders • Mobilising power

  14. Step 4 – Identification of priorities Decision-making step where top-down meets bottom-up: • Focus on a limited number of areas with potential for smart specialisationas emerged from entrepreneurial discovery • Areas where the region hopes to excel • Pay attention to horizontal priorities (Key Enabling Technologies, social innovation, etc.) • Avoid capture by interest groups!

  15. Step 5 – Implementation, definition of a coherent policy mix, roadmaps and action plan Organising and detailing rules and tools: • Roadmap will include: • Action plan  target groups, objectives, timeframes, indicators, sources of funding and budget allocations • Pilot projects  experiment with unprecedented policy mixes, obtain inputs for updating RIS3 strategies

  16. Step 6 – Integration of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms Mechanisms integrated in the strategy: • Monitoring  to verify the correct and efficient implementation of activities • Evaluation  to verify whether and how strategic goals are met Importance of ex-ante setting of measurable targets and output/outcome indicators

  17. The importance of communication of RIS3 Good communication is crucial: • To ensure RIS3 endorsement by all stakeholders • To engage new stakeholders • To inform the general public • Communication is needed at every stage of the process

  18. (Peer) Review and update of RIS3 Formulating and implementing a RIS3 is a continuous process: • Always a need to adapt and update the strategy • Information is gathered during implementation and incorporated into an updated RIS3 • Peer-review exercise: 1st Workshop in Seville (January 2012) 2nd Workshop in Seville (May 2012) 3rd Workshop in the Azores (June 2012) 4th Workshop in Pisa (September 2012) 5th Workshop Atlantic Arc (November 2012) 6th Workshop Somewhere (Dec 2012/Jan 2013)

  19. Presentations of RIS3 based on template with the 6 key elements of the guide; Distributed to ‘critical friends’ and experts together with background documents on the regions Peer discussion at the workshop Feedback report prepared by S3Platform: ‘feedback from the workshop’; Follow-ups after the workshop. Allows: - To switch roles (a region can be peer-reviewed as well as it can act as a peer-reviewer within the scope of same workshop); - To concentrate peer-learning in space and time, making it less formal and more open to interaction; - To integrate expertise and knowledge from a variety of sources: collaborative contribution from peers, experts from academia and Commission services. RIS3 Peer Review Methodology and transnational learning The SECI Model (Nonaka and Takeuchi)

  20. Seville, January 2012 19 regions participating from 10 countries 6 CONV regions Seville, May 2012 21 regions participating from 11 countries 4 CONV regions The Azores, June 2012 18 regions participating from 10 countries 11 CONV regions 12 regions have been peer reviewed: Friesland (NL) Nord-Pas de Calais (FR) The Basque Country (ES) West (RO) Scania County (SE) Apulia (IT) Wallonia (BE) Northern Ireland (UK) The Azores (PT) Cornwall (UK) Canary Islands (ES) Réunion (FR) Seven other regions have expressed interest to be peer reviewed Peer-review: current levels of participation

  21. Informal RIS3 assessment Innovation and knowledge-based development priorities? Stakeholder involvement? See expert questions in annex II of RIS 3 guide Appropriate actions identified? Outward looking?Promote critical mass/potential? Synergies between policies and funding sources? Align and leverage EU/national/regional policies towards identified areas of current and potential future strength? Innovation and knowledge-based development priorities? Evidence-based? Draft RIS 3 from REGION X Region X Conclusions and advice Appointed Expert(s)

  22. Self assessment of your RIS 3 process Elaborated from the original proposal by C.Saublens, EURADA

  23. Thank you! http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu JRC-IPTS-S3PLATFORM@ec.europa.eu

More Related