Briefed by: [insert briefer’s name here] [insert briefer’s organization code here]

1. [insert briefing type here][insert program name here]for[insert name and organization of person(s) to be briefed here][insert “month day, year” of brief here] Insert program logo in this area Briefed by:[insert briefer’s name here] [insert briefer’s organization code here] [insert briefer’s phone number here] [Insert briefer’s e-mail address here] Distribution Statement

2. Key Stakeholders

3. Purpose of Briefing

4. Briefing Outline

5. Program Overview • ACAT • Program Phase • Milestone or Decision that this phase of test will support • Mission • Inventory Objective (quantities)

6. ADM Exit Criteria andAction Item Status Required at this time, but not completed In progress & on schedule Y Completed R G

7. Concept/Requirement

8. System OverviewComponent/System Description

9. System OverviewCapability Enabler

10. Development StrategyEnd-to-End Capability BASE NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE Long Haul (DISN & Commercial) MC AIR STATION TELEPORT/STEP CLINIC BASE HQ TRNGCEN NOC IMA FISC USN/USMC LOGISTIC BASE TRAINING CENTER Pier Connections Deployed/ Mobile Units NMCI at the Pier End-to-End Connectivity

11. Program OverviewAccomplishments/History

12. Program OverviewPrevious Guidance(if Required)

13. Acquisition Coordination Team (ACT) • The following (Program Name) ACT members have been briefed on the program status and concur with the fielding of (Program Name).

14. Program Information and Documentation Status Y B R O G In approval cycle. Expected Date in Comments NR Not required. Rationale in Comments Requires development or updating w/in 12 months Required at this time, but does not exist Required at this time and under development/update Current, with all required approvals

15. [insert program name]Program Overview ChartDATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YYYY SCHEDULE FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 I I I I I I I I II II II II II II II II III III III III III III III III IV IV IV IV IV IV IV IV FY by Quarters Milestones MS-IIB&C IOC MSD MS IIID FOC LRIP R&D / Studies OPEVAL FOT&E Testing SVR Development CDR 20 Production 5 1 3 3 Installation (IT) ACAT Level: MDA: OSD T&E Oversight: Y/N PM / Sponsor Cost Schedule Performance Programmatic Compliance Logistics Contract Execution Overall Volatility Contact Info here Contact Info here Acquisition Objectives Quantity 650 IOC 12 / 99 Target Price (unit) $Various $M (FY XX) $610.12 Key Performance Parameters KPPObjectiveThresholdDemo OP Avail .90 .90 .98 S/W Reliability 200 hrs 200 hrs 1000 hrs S/W Mean 5 sec 5 sec 3.2 sec xxxx x x x Contract Execution Ratings: G= CPI/SPI .95 or > Y= CPI/SPI .85 -.94 R = CPI/SPI < .85 Description: Program Start Date: MM / YY [Insert program description here] Joint or International: [Insert joint or International details] Contractor Data Contractor Litton DSD Value / Type $NA / GSA Start / Complete APR97 / APR03 Contractor XXX Value / Type $XX / XXX Start / Complete XXX / XXX Cost Data ($ in M)* CostObjectiveThresholdCurrent Est. R&D 0 0 0 Proc 300.3 300.3 380 O&S 250.5 250.5 276.1 xxxx x x x * Values from last approved APB Budget Source:

16. Affordability by Increment Notes 1. FY05 includes 11 LRIP systems and 27 Increment II Upgrade Kits which are on CODE B hold pending FRP 2.Target Inventory Objective of 110 systems * Current procurement and install schedule includes 96 ships and 4 shore sites * Remaining 10 systems planned for FY09 not shown in table,Program direction expects INC III installation to begin and INC II to end in FY09

17. SPAWAR 01-6 Cost Risk * Confidence Index based on weighted averages

18. Cost as an Independent Variable(CAIV)

19. Analysis of Alternatives

20. Acquisition Strategy (Requirements and Approach) • Source Documents: • Typical source documents that effect strategy are ICD/CDD/CPD, AoA, etc. • Approach: Single Step or Evolutionary • Each increment requires a MS C and if development a MS B. These could be supported by one CDD containing all capabilities and multiple CPDs supporting each increment of useable capability. Each increment could use the same CDD (revalidated each time) for the MS B and would have a separate CPD for the MS C. This method supports Evolutionary acquisition, the preferred approach. See CJCSI 3170 for other Evolutionary approached

21. Acquisition Strategy (Program Structure) FY03 FY05 FY07 FY04 FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 Concept Decision Milestone A RFP Development Milestone B Contract Award Development Test/OA Milestone C/LRIP Decision Operational Test IOC FRP Decision

22. Acquisition Strategy (Business Approach) Current Contracts • New Procurement Actions • Proposed [name of effort] Contract • Competitive or Sole Source (if sole source provide justification • Contract Type: • Estimated contract value: • Period of Performance: • Acquisition Objectives: • Estimated Contract Award: • Status of Acquisition Plan:

23. Contract EV Metrics and Performance Projections Y Solvency (Provide comments in notes page) PEO and Program Manager/PMS-XXX, Program Acronym, ACAT XX, Date Reported Contractor Name, Contract Number, Contract Type, Short Contract Title Use Contractor Provided Format CPI: SPI:

24. CPARS/IPARS/Award Fee Matrix Contractor PM Name/Gov’t PM Name Date of Review: ddmmmyy

25. LOGISTICS SUPPORT(Compliance with DoD/SECNAV 5000 series and policy documents)

26. Program AssessmentInstallation Readiness Place the assessment rating icon here. Delete the remaining.

27. Software MaturityPriority 1 STR’s

28. Software MaturityPriority 1 STR Status

29. KPP Compliance Threshold Objective [Combat capability] [C4I Interoperability, (Strategic, Theater, Force Coord.)] [Cost] [Manning] [Sustained Speed] [Endurance]

30. NESI SUMMARY

31. NESI Status No Compliance Acquisition Low Compliance Some Compliance Technical Complete Compliance 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 The “Mean Score” from each summary chart automatically creates the Maturity level.

32. COI Assessment(Based on DT Results)* * For DRR, assess likelihood of achieving COI Thresholds

33. Interoperability(Net Ready)

34. PEO C4I Review Checklist

35. PEO C4I Review Checklist

36. PEO C4IReview Checklist

37. PEO C4IReview Checklist

38. Program Risk Assessment • A brief description of Issue # 6 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 5 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 1 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 3 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 4 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 2 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation Medium High e d LIKELIHOOD c b a Low Medium a c d e b CONSEQUENCE Acronyms: [IMA= Intermediate Maintenance Activity] Risk Advisory Board: [Mr. X, PMA xxx] [Ms. Y, XYZ Corp] [Ms. Z, DASN YY]

39. Key Issues Legend No further action required Significant interest outside Program Cannot be solved within the Program

40. Other Decision Factors and Challenges • [List as appropriate] • Example: Acquisition Coordination Team, Chaired by [insert name] concurred that [insert program name] is ready for OT&E on [date] • Example: Acquisition Coordination Team, Chaired by [insert name] concurred that [insert program name] is ready to enter SDD Phase

41. PM Assessment

42. Recommendations