GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (SUSTAINMENT)

1. CLASSIFICATION (U) GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (SUSTAINMENT) PROGRAM NAME ACAT: ____ Joint Designation: ___ Program Manager Name; PM Code Requirements Officer Name; RS Code Briefer Name; Code Briefer Name; Code Review Date MM/DD/YYYY Classified by: Reason: Decl on: 1 CLASSIFICATION (U)

2. Purpose • Decisions Desired • Sustainment effectiveness and affordability review at IOC + NLT 4 years • Resolution of initial operational command sustainment issues (triggering events) • Assess affordability

3. Purpose

4. Membership [..not a briefing slide]

5. Entrance Criteria 1. Accomplished System FRPDR 2. Achieved System IOC 3. Completed Supportability Assessment (ILA) 4. Updated Program cost estimates (in accordance with NCCA policy (i.e. MIL HDBK 881 and OSD CAIG protocols) 5. Updated Program LCSP and LRFS, including TOC initiatives Notes: Clearly explain reasons if Entrance Criteria is not met.

6. Goals/Exit Criteria 1. Concur with selected recommendations to resolve asset and mission readiness issues or shortfalls 2. Concur with TOC reduction opportunities 3. Concur with risk assessments 4. Acceptance of CPD capability requirements changes or recommend new or updated capabilities to meet evolving operational capability need 5. Satisfactory review of Program Health Note: Please provide performance against the listed Exit Criteria.

7. Describe what assets were fielded and when, to attain IOC (including initial spares, training, and support equipment) Identify operational units (including other services and/or agencies) that now employ this capability Discuss IOC Sustainment Review findings and status of resolutions Specify target date for FOC attainment IOC/FOC Schedule & Definitions

8. Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Page 1 of 3 • Business Model Details • Supportability Analyses • Level of Repair • Manpower • Analysis and Reporting of Sustainment/Readiness/Cost Performance • Sustainment Contracts • PBL Strategy and evaluation • Other Government • Contractor • Product Data Ownership/Usage • LCSP Integrated Schedule/Milestones Note: The content on this slide will likely require multiple slides to address.

9. Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Page 2 of 3 • Manpower, Personnel, and Training • Product and Technical Data • Maintenance Strategy • Levels of Repair • Facilities and Infrastructure • Logistics Footprint • Describe as functions of systems design interface (including diagnostics), maintenance strategy, supply and transportation, manpower and training, etc. • Safety and Environmental Compliance Note: The content on this slide will likely require multiple slides to address.

10. Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Page 3 of 3 • Sustainment Program Management • Assimilation within broader logistics infrastructures • LCSP adjusted to “replaced systems” sustainment planning • Supply Management and Transportation • Technology Refreshment, Obsolescence Management, and Corrosion Prevention • Modernization opportunities (investment) Note: The content on this slide will likely require multiple slides to address. Pre-decisional – Not for Release

11. Results of Supportability Assessment (ILA) Note: Need to provide mitigation plans in backup for all items rated Yellow or Red. Pre-decisional – Not for Release

12. CPD Parameter Metric Measurement Life Cycle Sustainment Metrics to include KPPs, KSAs, and target goals. Separate slides follow, one per parameter not at threshold value. Basis Legend E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data |L = Legacy Improving Constant Degrading Pre-decisional – Not for Release

13. Program Budget versus Total Ownership Cost Estimate Program Funding & Quantities

14. Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) - Logistics Requirements and Funding Summary (LRFS) Note: Tailor template to program’s actual LRFS categories * LRFS is the LCSP’s budget-to-requirements baseline for planning and life-cycle execution of systems “Sustainment”

15. FOC A B C IOC Updated TOC Profile By Appropriation Across Projected Lifecycle Note any life-cycle assumption changes ## $ ## $ ## $ ## $ ## $ ## $ ## $ TOC OBJECTIVE $$ M/TY CURRENT SCP OM MP MILCON MPN PROCUREMENT RDT&E FY# FY## FY## FY## FY## FY## Prior Yrs Spent LRIP FRP – Qty/Period $$ FYDP $$ Remaining LC FYs $$ by Year Pre-decisional – Not for Release 15

16. Summary of CONOPS as Employed • Describe concept of employment of the capability as employed. • Mission area contribution to the Joint force including • Continued alignment with OSD capability guidance/vision and Navy/Marine Corps strategies • Operational unit employment (numbers/organizations) • Types and quantities of assets currently fielded • Overview of logistics and sustainment operations • Fielding • Manning • Maintenance Management and Logistics IT • Supply Management (to include IUID) • Transportation

17. Configuration Steering Board (CSB) • Program Manager Recommendations Provide Mitigation Plans in Backup

18. Configuration Steering Board (CSB) • Program Manager Recommendations

19. Evaluation of TOC Reduction, Initiatives, and Investment • Key O&S Phase cost drivers and root causes • Update prior program TOC planning and ongoing execution • Show execution results in terms of reducing cost toward the TOC Objective • Proposed investment/modernization, targeting the SCP/TOC Objective delta within any span of the O&S phase that is not yet being addressed by a TOC reduction initiative Note: The content on this slide will likely require multiple slides to address.

20. [This slide is not part of Gate Review] Another Approach towards making TOC a strategic pursuit, in Navy • Annual call, that program sponsor proposals identify TOC mitigation/reduction initiatives, as part of the POM process. • Some initiative may become TOC “pilot programs” • Annual call to "Fleet Readiness Enterprise" and "Logistics Providers” for enterprise-wide, economy-of-scale, initiatives. • Viable TOC initiatives to be briefed to VCNO and RD&A. • Results and lessons of TOC initiatives/pilots published in a TOC Guidebook • First Guidebook limited to advice to programs on TOC-related aspects • of the Gate Review process

22. Interdependencies Programs, plus major public/private Sustainment infrastructure Interdependencies Program H Program I (upgrades) Program J Program K Program L Program M Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Program G C S P Program XYZ Program XYZ Solid denotes current system Dash denotes future system Arrow to Program XYZ denotes supports Program XYZ Arrow from Program XYZ denotes Program XYZ supports Indicates program are interdependent No known issues affecting inter-related programs Resolvable interface issues affecting programs Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs

23. JCIDS MaterielSolution Analysis Operations & Support Production & Deployment Engineering and Manufacturing Development Technology Development 99 Fiscal Year 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 98 19 00 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Quarter 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 MDD Requirements AoA Disposal Life Cycle Sustainment LRIP/IOT&E MS A IOC FRP DR MS B MS C FOC CPD ICD CDD Post-CDRA Acquisition Milestones Draft CDD Gate Chair CNO/CMC Program Initiation at MS B 3 1 4 2 3 5 6 6 6 6 6 Gate Chair ASN/RDA • x SystemsEngineering • x MSA • x • x Core Capability SFR • x Software IERs FRR PCR PRR PDR SRR CDR Logistics Events ILA ILA IOCSR MSD ILA Major Contract Events LRIP Lot 1/ IOTE support Prototype RFP EMD RFP RFP = EVM IBR LRIP Lot 2 FRP MYP = RDT&E contracts IBR IBR IBR Phase I System Design Award/Mult. Shipyards contracts = PROD SD2 CDR SD1 SD1 FDR SD2 = Ship Specific DD&C Contract Award Lot 1 x # L/Lead Subsequent Lots Production LRIP L/Lead = RDT&E assets FRP EMD = PROD systems Design = System Deliveries Build & Integrate Ship Development Qualify – Includes: Temp, Shock, Vibe, IM Sim Training Systems Maint. Trainers = trainingdevice deliveries Initial Training (T&E) TDFA OT Training TEMP • TEMP TES TEMP Test &Evaluation OA OA BLRIP Report = select documents Prototype Testing Constructive M&S LFTE Report Constructive M&S = First Flight Virtual M&S Virtual M&S SIL TempAlt Development SIL HITL ISTF ShipAlt Development LFTE (Components) LFTE (Systems) Economic Analysis & CCE (MAIS only) IT1 and subsequent AOTR / OTRR FOTE IOT&E Economic Analysis & CCE (MAIS only) Economic Analysis & CCE (MAIS only) Economic Analysis & CCE (MAIS only) Cost CCE Affordability Assessment POE ICE CARD CARD CCE ICE POE POE ICE CCE Affordability Assessment CCE ICE CARD POE optional optional optional MDAP MDAP MDAP/MAIS MDAP MDAP optional MDAP MDAP/MAIS ATO (Type Accreditation) IATT Phase I Definition IATO DIACAP Phase II Verification and Certification Testing Phase III Validation / Cert Tests Phase IV Post Accreditation RDTE Funding Production Total Schedule

24. Risk #4 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation • Risk #1 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation • Risk #3 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation • Risk #5 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation • Risk #2 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation • Risk #6 Title, and • Root cause for the risk • Approach to remedy/mitigation 5 4 Likelihood 3 2 Risk Management Board CAPT A. B. Seas – Title Mrs. A. B. Jones – Title Dr. D. E. Sailor – Title Mr. B. D. Doe – Title Ms. C. G. Smith – Title 1 1 2 3 4 5 Consequence Significant Risks Risk Reporting Matrix

25. Program Health

26. PoPS “Green” state for each of 7 criteria under the sustainment metric at the Sustainment Gate

27. Decisions Reached Note: Please provide performance against the listed Exit Criteria

28. Life Cycle Product Support Sustainment Business Model and Life Cycle Sustainment Framework Sustainment-related Performance Capability Parameters LCSP features, sustainment contracts, including details of planned maintenance levels and organic/contractor shared responsibilities. O&S $ Data Sustainment Performance and Ownership Cost Governance, Metric Measurement, and Analysis POA&M dates and details, covering sustainment program governance and events to date, along that POA&M path MILCON