120 likes | 327 Views
Project Team. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillGeorge H. Pink, PhDRebecca T. Slifkin, PhDMark Holmes, PhDJ. Patrick McGee, CPA. Objectives . Construct a set of financial performance measures that are relevant to Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)Provide comparative information tha
E N D
1. Financial Performance Measures of Critical Access Hospitals National Flex Program Meeting
June 15-17, 2004
Chicago, Ill
2. Project Team University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
George H. Pink, PhD
Rebecca T. Slifkin, PhD
Mark Holmes, PhD
J. Patrick McGee, CPA
3. Objectives Construct a set of financial performance measures that are relevant to Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)
Provide comparative information that CAH boards and managements can use to improve financial performance
4. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Dave Berk, Rural Health Financial Services, Anacortes WA
Brandon Durbin, Durbin & Company LLP, Lubbock TX
Roger Thompson, Seim, Johnson, Sestak & Quist LLP, Omaha NE
Gregory Wolf, Stroudwater Associates, Portland ME
5. Methods:Literature Review Undertook an extensive literature review in relation to measurement of the financial performance of small hospitals
Identified dimensions of financial performance appropriate for CAHs
Constructed a long list of potential indicators for each dimension, including definition, interpretation, and data requirements of each indicator
6. Methods:Indicator Selection Developed an instrument to evaluate the feasibility, importance, and usefulness of potential performance dimensions and indicators
Distributed literature review, list of potential indicators, and indicator evaluation instrument to TAG
TAG selected 4 performance dimensions and 20 indicators of financial performance
7. Methods:Indicator Definition Constructed indicator definitions using accounts from Medicare cost reports
Produced first pass of indicators for all CAHs, including descriptive statistics and histograms.
Identified outliers and searched for data errors and problems
Revised indicator definitions and produced indicator reports
1) Program goals become more difficult to monitor as they move from hospital
level activities to broader system impacts:
a) Financial viability
b) Quality
c) Network development
d) Access
e) Community impact
f) EMS development
2) Indicators and measures to assess program performance must:
a) Be appropriate to the Flex Program
b) Have internal and external validity
c) Use indicators and data that capture changes
Most state Flex programs operate under a year to year framework as driven by the funding cycle.
a) PLMs can encourage longer perspective by focusing more on strategies and underlying assumptions and less on year to year activities
1) Program goals become more difficult to monitor as they move from hospital
level activities to broader system impacts:
a) Financial viability
b) Quality
c) Network development
d) Access
e) Community impact
f) EMS development
2) Indicators and measures to assess program performance must:
a) Be appropriate to the Flex Program
b) Have internal and external validity
c) Use indicators and data that capture changes
Most state Flex programs operate under a year to year framework as driven by the funding cycle.
a) PLMs can encourage longer perspective by focusing more on strategies and underlying assumptions and less on year to year activities
8. Information for CAHs In August 2004, CEOs of every CAH with post-conversion cost report data will be mailed a package that includes:
A letter explaining the project
Financial indicators for their CAH
Median values for CAHs in their region, and CAHs in the U.S.
An evaluation form
9. Information for State Flex Coordinators In August 2004, each State Flex Coordinator will be mailed a package that includes:
A letter explaining the project
Financial indicators for the CAHs in their state, region, and the U.S.
An evaluation form
10. Indicator Format One page per indicator
Simple graph and small table of several years of comparative data
Indicator definition and Medicare Cost Report Account codes
Interpretation, results and data quality
11. Indicators Profitability
Total margin, cash flow margin, ROE
Liquidity
Current ratio, days cash on hand, net days revenue in accounts receivable
Capital structure
Equity financing, debt service coverage, long-term debt to capitalization
Other
Average age of plant, outpatient charges to total charges, patient deductions, FTEs per adjusted occupied bed, Medicare inpatient payer mix, Medicare outpatient payer mix, Medicare outpatient cost to charge ratio, Medicare revenue/Medicare days, ADC SNF swing beds, ADC acute care beds
12. Next Steps Receive feedback from CEOs and State Flex Coordinators
Evaluate feedback and review with TAG
Revise and issue second report in 2005
Investigate cost / quality relationships when quality data become available