1 / 12

Questions/Quiz News Great Person Theory Trait Theory Behavior Theory

Week 3. Questions/Quiz News Great Person Theory Trait Theory Behavior Theory Next week: Lewin’s Autocratic-Democratic Model, Argyris’ Maturity Model, Tannenbaum & Schmidt’s Leadership Continuum. The Leadership Tool Kit : Different theories for different purposes. Trait Theory

geraldo
Download Presentation

Questions/Quiz News Great Person Theory Trait Theory Behavior Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 3 • Questions/Quiz • News • Great Person Theory • Trait Theory • Behavior Theory • Next week: Lewin’s Autocratic-Democratic Model, Argyris’ Maturity Model, Tannenbaum & Schmidt’s Leadership Continuum

  2. The Leadership Tool Kit: Different theories for different purposes Trait Theory Leadership Practices McGregor’s X-Y, MBTI Tannenbaum-Wechsler Succession theory Substitutes/neutralizers Org. culture Identify qualities for selection, coaching, performance eval. Leadership Preferences Orientation Leader replacement Worker satisfaction & productivity Delegation & power sharing Vroom-Jago Normative Model Path-Goal Theory Crisis Management Mentoring Style & situation fit Leader-Member Exchange Vertical Dyad Linkage Cognitive Resources Theory Fiedler’s Leadership Contingency Hersey-Blanchard situational Blake-Mouton Managerial Grid Argyris Maturity Model

  3. “A rose by any other name”-- Similarities among leadership theories

  4. Great Person, Trait & Behavior Theories of Leadership

  5. The Great Person Approach to leadership • Where does the Great Person approach come from and what are its assumptions? • What are some limitations of the “Great Person” approach? • What are “traits”? • What traits are most related to leadership?

  6. 40 years of leadership research finds some traits are necessary but not sufficient: • Intelligence (but not too much), scholarship initiative, independence, inventiveness (correlated with age, drops after age 40) • Self assurance, confidence, aspiration, perceived occupational level • Reflection-- the “helicopter factor" (being able to hover above and reflect on self and team), objectivity • Demographic characteristics: good health, above or below average height, upper SES • Enthusiasm, sociability, integrity, courage, imagination, decisiveness, determination, energy • Sociability: dependable, responsible, active, socially participate, cooperative, popular • Motivation: show initiative and persistence • Cognitive ability: intelligent, scholarly, insightful, verbal, adaptable

  7. Leadership Behaviors What behaviors and personal characteristics (traits) do you think would be most and least correlated with leadership? Correlate High with Leadership Correlate Low with Leadership • originality • popularity • sociability • judgment • aggressiveness (assertiveness) • humor • desire to excel • cooperativeness • liveliness • athletic ability • age • height • weight • physique • energy • appearance • dominance • mood control

  8. The Behavioral Approach to Leadership • The Behavioral Approach suggests that leaders behave in ways that differentiate themselves from those who are not chosen for leadership. • What are some of the behaviors in a team or committee setting that would increase chances of being viewed as a leader? • What are behaviors in that setting that would mitigate against being seen as a leader?

  9. Behaviors working for and against leadership selection For-- • high participation and talking • comfort and fluency in delivering information • forceful and energetic in presentation • does not express strong opinions early in group (can later) • initiates conversation • introduces new themes and topics • seeks comments from others (Gatekeeper role) • sits at head of table • in a position of receiving, dispensing, or coordinating information • avoids obviously persuading other to a point of view • interacts flexibly with others; changes style as needed but not seen as chameleon • promotes identity of group ("we, us, our", etc.) • listens accurately to other's contributions • demonstrates achievement, goal orientationand task structure Against– • low level of participation, involvement or contribution • uninformed contribution • overly directive comments • offensive language (including sexist and profanity) • stilted, overly formal language • dominates conversation • absent from meetings • volunteers as secretary or recorder of meetings • takes role of joker • shows contempt for leadership • willing to do as told • presents self too strongly early in group discussion

  10. How would you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the trait/behavior approach?

  11. A few problems with the trait approach • many of these traits are relatively abstract-- how they are defined may refer to different behaviors, and may be too abstract to be adequately measured • they may overlap in meaning making them difficult to distinguish or apply • hundreds (if not thousands) of traits have been identified-- it's not possible for a leader to have them all • there are too many exceptions to the rule-- some people don't have these traits but are successful leaders • some traits are actually opposites of each other • the trait approach does not view personality asn an integrated whole, but as a collection of features or behaviors. • what may be a useful trait in one setting or culture may not be useful in another • referring to traits implies relatively fixed or stable qualities, and does not consider how well they are developed, adapted and used • reduced to a minimum, traits may be necessary but not sufficient conditions for leadership • the trait approach does not consider the role of followers or situational conditions; too much weight is placed on the leader

  12. Team case discussion • Identify a case or leader in which you can apply the leadership behavior approach (e.g., coaching a person to “behave” like a leader). • How would you go about coaching or training a person? • What are some ethical or practical issues in this approach?

More Related