480 likes | 693 Views
Optimal Surgery for Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers. Jason Dodge, MD, FRCSC, MEd April 9 th , 2010. Objectives. At the end of this session, participants will be able to… list the rationales for the surgical management of endometrial and ovarian cancers
E N D
Optimal Surgery for Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers Jason Dodge, MD, FRCSC, MEd April 9th, 2010
Objectives At the end of this session, participants will be able to… • list the rationales for the surgical management of endometrial and ovarian cancers • recognize the optimal components of surgical staging for both endometrial and ovarian cancers • understand the importance of surgical staging for endometrial and ovarian cancer in determining prognosis and the role(s) for adjuvant therapy • identify the importance of surgical debulking for ovarian cancer
Prototype Case • 52 y.o. G3P3 post-menopausal woman • Healthy, asymptomatic • 7-8 cm pelvic mass on routine exam • U/S – 7.5 cm multiloculated, solid/cystic mass arising within right ovary • CA-125 – 25 • Booked for surgery by community gynaecologist
Prototype Case • TAH-BSO through lower transverse incision • Solid/cystic ovarian mass resected intact • No other abnormalities identified in OR note • Final pathology: • Grade 2 serous carcinoma of ovary • Negative uterus and contralateral adnexa
What stage is this woman’s ovarian cancer? • 1A • 1B • 1C • 2B • 3C
What is the risk this woman has (undetected) metastatic disease? • <1% • 10% • 30% • 50% • 80% Young et al., JAMA, 1983
What is the best approach to her management at this point? • Observation • Refer back to local gynaecologist for repeat surgery for optimal surgical staging • Refer to Gynaecologic oncologist for repeat surgery for optimal surgical staging • Adjuvant chemotherapy (Carbo/Taxol IV) • Other
Outline • Optimal surgery for ovarian cancer • Diagnosis • Surgical Staging • Debulking • Facilitating optimal treatment
Roles of Primary Surgery in Ovarian Cancer • Diagnosis (final) • Staging (SURGICAL, NOT CT!) • Therapy • Palliation of symptoms • Removal of cancer (debulking) • Facilitating optimal adjuvant therapy • Prognosis of individual patient • Risks/benefits of adjuvant therapy
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Staging Patterns of spread: • Intraperitoneal • Local • Lymphatic • Hematogenous Optimal surgical staging procedure must rule out metastases by all of these routes
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Staging Components of optimal surgical staging: • Peritoneal washings • Inspection and palpation of abdominal and pelvic organs and peritoneal surfaces • biopsy of all suspicious lesions • BSO (+/- TAH) • Omentectomy • Pelvic & para-aortic lymphadenectomies • Multiple peritoneal biopsies
FIGO staging (ovary) • I – confined to ovary/ies • A (single ovary) • B (bilateral ovaries) • C (positive washings, surface disease, ruptured) • II – confined to pelvis • A (fallopian tube or uterine extension) • B (other pelvic metastases) • C (pelvic involvement with +washings or tumour rupture) • III – abdominal/pelvic cavity extension or nodes +ve • A (microscopic only) • B (<2 cm nodule(s)) • C (>2cm nodule(s) or retroperitoneal lymph nodes involved) • IV – positive pleural effusion, parenchymal liver or other distant metastases
What stage is this woman’s ovarian cancer? • 1A • 1B • 1C • 2B • 3C ?
KEY MESSAGE! What is the risk this woman has (undetected) metastatic disease? • <1% • 10% • 30% • 50% • 80% Young et al., JAMA, 1983
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Staging “Stage 1” patients who are not optimally staged at surgery have a poorer survival! ACTION trial Trimbos et al., JNCI, 2003
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Staging No benefit to adjuvant chemoRx in patients who are optimally surgically staged! ACTION trial Trimbos et al., JNCI, 2003
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Debulking • Optimal debulking of metastatic disease associated with improved survival • Best predictor of survival in patients with advanced stage disease • Delay in definitive surgical debulking may be associated with decreased survival Bristow et al., J Clin Oncol, 2002 Bristow & Chi, Gynecol Oncol, 2006
Therapeutic Debulking Bristow et al., JCO, 2002
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Facilitating Optimal Adjuvant Therapy • “Stage I” • If optimally staged, evidence suggests that chemotherapy may not be useful in improving survival • If not optimally staged, chemotherapy indicated to improve survival rates (because significant number have undiagnosed advanced staged disease) ICON1/ACTION trials Trimbos et al., JNCI, 2003
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Facilitating Optimal Adjuvant Therapy • Advanced Stage • Chemotherapy demonstrated to improve overall survival • Recent acceptance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as ideal mode of therapy for women with optimally debulked disease after primary surgery • Optimal debulking <1 cm residual • Insertion of IP catheter at primary surgery Covens et al., CCO Guidelines, 2005 Armstrong et al., NEJM, 2006
Surgery in Ovarian Cancer:Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy • Delivery of chemotherapy directly into peritoneal cavity via implanted catheter • Most pronounced survival benefit ever documented in ovarian cancer (17 m) • Only patients optimally debulked at primary surgery are eligible Armstrong et al., NEJM, 2006
Current practice in Ontario… • Many ovarian cancer surgery cases in Ontario are not performed optimally • Many women with high pre-operative likelihood of ovarian cancer in Ontario would not be referred to a gynaecologic oncologist prior to surgery Elit et al., JOGC, 2006 Dodge, JOGC, 2007
Role of Gyn Oncology Referral • Women with ovarian cancer who have primary surgery performed by a gynaecologic oncologist [at a tertiary centre] have a better outcome (survival) • More likely to be optimally staged • More likely to be optimally debulked • More likely to receive optimal adjuvant therapy Elit et al., JOGC, 2006 Giede et al., Gynecol Oncol., 2005 Le et al., JOGC, 2009
“Women with a high likelihood of having ovarian cancer should ideally be referred to a gynaecologic oncologist preoperatively to facilitate optimal surgery for ovarian cancer.” CCO Quality Indicators - Gagliardi et al., Gynecol Oncol, 2006 SOGC Guidelines – Le et al., JOGC, 2009 SGO Referral Guidelines, Gynecol Oncol, 2000 ACOG Committee Opinion #280, December, 2002
Prototype Case • 61 y.o. G0P0 post-menopausal woman • Healthy, bleeding x few weeks • No abnormality detected on routine exam • Endometrial biopsy reveals grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of uterus • Booked for surgery by community gynaecologist
Prototype Case • TAH-BSO through lower transverse incision • No other abnormalities identified in OR note • Final pathology: • Serous carcinoma of uterus • No myometrial invasion, no LVSI/CLS • Negative cervix and adnexa
What is the risk this woman has (undetected) metastatic disease? • <1% • 10% • 25% • 50% • 80%
What is the next best step in her management? • Observation • Refer to Gynaecologic oncologist for repeat surgery for optimal surgical staging • Adjuvant chemotherapy (Carbo/Taxol IV) • Adjuvant radiotherapy • Other
Roles of Primary Surgery in Endometrial Cancer • Diagnosis (final) • Staging (SURGICAL, NOT CT!) • Therapy • Palliation of symptoms • Removal of cancer (debulking) • Facilitating optimal adjuvant therapy • Prognosis of individual patient • Risks/benefits of adjuvant therapy
Surgery in Endometrial Cancer:Staging Patterns of spread: • Local • Lymphatic • Intraperitoneal • Hematogenous Optimal surgical staging procedure must rule out metastases by all of these routes
Surgery in Endometrial Cancer:Staging Components of optimal surgical staging: • Peritoneal washings • Inspection and palpation of abdominal and pelvic organs and peritoneal surfaces • biopsy of all suspicious lesions • BSO (+/- TH) • “extended” surgical staging • Omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies • Pelvic & para-aortic lymphadenectomies
Staging for Endometrial Carcinoma FIGO 1971 Clinical Staging FIGO 1988 Surgical Staging GOG 33, 1987
Surgical staging: Findings GOG 33 (n=621) – “clinical stage I” • exploratory laparotomy, TAH-BSO, pelvic & para-aortic nodes, peritoneal washings • positive peritoneal washings 12% • positive adnexa 5% • positive pelvic nodes 9% • positive aortic nodes 6% • intraperitoneal disease 6% • 22% ADVANCED STAGE DISEASE
Pelvic lymph node metastases GOG 33, 1987
Para-aortic lymph node metastases GOG 33, 1987
Benefits of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy • Documentation of true nodal status (prognostic) • usually only microscopic involvement (~90%) • worse prognosis when +ve (50-70% 5-yr OS with Rx) Randall, 2006 Muggia, 2007
Benefits of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy • Therapeutic value • Benefit from chemotherapy +/- RRx if nodes involved • Avoidance of whole pelvic RRx if staging negative • ? Independent survival benefit Randall, 2006 Muggia, 2007 PORTEC, EN-5, MRC, GOG 99, NRH MRC, Italian trial vs. Kilgore, Fanning, Orr,
Para-aortic lymphadenectomy • Higher potential for morbidity • Prolonged operative time • Most cases (98%) can be predicted based on: • +ve pelvic nodes, OR • +ve adnexa, OR • +ve cervix • Potential benefit small GOG 33, 1987 Faught, 1994
GOG LAP-2,2006 What are the risks? • Improved with training (Gyn Onc) • These risks not solely due to nodes • Much of this risk related to para-aortic node dissection • Much improved with laparoscopy (Lap-2)
Perspective from Other Pelvic Cancers • Adjuvant chemotherapy proven survival benefit in node-positive colorectal cancer mesorectal excision (node dissection) • Adjuvant chemotherapy proven survival benefit in node-positive cervical cancer • Risk of pelvic node metastases in cervical cancer managed surgically at PMH: 5%
Current Use of Lymphadenectomyfor Endometrial Cancer in Toronto • NOT ROUTINE • SELECTIVE SAMPLING (suspicious nodes) • STAGING (not completely uniform) • Grade 2,3 endometrioid • Stage IC (with >50% myometrial invasion) • High risk histologic subtype without obvious extra-uterine disease
KEY MESSAGE! What is the risk this woman has (undetected) metastatic disease? • <1% • 10% • 30% • 50% • 80%
“Every woman with (endometrial) cancer deserves individualized management that maximizes her prognosis and minimizes her morbidity.” • “Documentation of disease extent via surgical staging allows optimal tailoring of adjuvant therapy to an individual patient’s risks.”