1 / 20

Flash Flood Fatality Frequency in Texas Counties

Flash Flood Fatality Frequency in Texas Counties. Specializing in Geospatial Analysis San Marcos, Texas. Introduction. Potential Consequences Property, Economic, Agricultural Production Losses Impact Welfare of Communities Loss of Life Increased Population Growth & Development =

gerd
Download Presentation

Flash Flood Fatality Frequency in Texas Counties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flash Flood Fatality Frequencyin Texas Counties Specializing in Geospatial Analysis San Marcos, Texas

  2. Introduction • Potential Consequences • Property, Economic, Agricultural Production Losses • Impact Welfare of Communities • Loss of Life Increased Population Growth & Development = Increased Risk International Flash Flood Laboratory (IFFL) James and Marilyn Lovell Center for Geographic Education and Hazards Research Texas State University – San Marcos Department of Geography

  3. Objectives – Problem Statement • Spatial distribution flash flood fatalities in Texas counties • Any existing patterns • Areas of vulnerability • Correlation to event damages and population growth • Variables that characterize those most likely to be at risk • Play an integral role in enhancing the establishment of the IFFL.

  4. Data – Flash Flood Fatality Database • SHELDUS – Hazards Research Laboratory, University of South Carolina • Start/End Date • Injuries & Deaths • Property & Crop Damage • NCDC Storm Data Reports • Narrative description of event • National Weather Service

  5. Data – GIS Analysis • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) • Major Rivers • Terrain • Texas Natural Resource Information System (TNRIS) • Texas Counties • Texas State Data Center (TSDC) • Population Growth Maps

  6. Methodology: Flash Flood Fatality Database SHELDUS Search – At least 1 Fatality + Cross-referenced with NCDC Storm Data • Additional Variables • Demographics: Age & Gender • Type of Incident Death • Latitude/Longitude or Other Location Information

  7. Methodology – GIS Analysis • Data Layers Imported • Fatality Data → County Layer: Keyboard Entry • Newly Created Attribute Fields: • FAT_TOT • FAT_1990 • FAT_2000 • PROP_TOT • CROP_TOT • Maps created

  8. Results – Flash Flood Fatality Totals Total Fatalities: 182 1990s: 82 2000s: 100

  9. Results – Flash Flood Fatalities

  10. Flash Flood Fatality Distribution

  11. Distribution vs. Physical Environment

  12. Population Growth vs. Distribution Produced by Texas State Data Center

  13. Population Growth vs. Distribution Produced by Texas State Data Center

  14. Website http://geo-305575.evans.txstate.edu

  15. Variables Indicating Risk • Males < 20 or 60+ years of age • Vehicles • Elevation Changes – Balcones Escarpment • Close Proximity to Rivers • High Population Growth

  16. Discussion • Frequency varies from year to year • Fatality/Event Decrease • Awareness Programs target specific groups • Possible Explanation – Road System • Rural Areas Surrounding Urban Centers

  17. Limitations • Lack of accurate and complete data • Exact geographic locations • Standardized reporting method needed • Time Constraints Hindered Confidence in Results

  18. Implications • Improved means of public education • Integral role in establishing IFFL • Foundation – One small step • Improved understanding of the magnitude, pattern and circumstances

  19. Future Research • Development of a more comprehensive & complete database • Expand Variables Examined • Ethnicity • Income Levels • Stream Density • Floodplain Overlap • Flood Control Structures • Role of Infrastructure & Development • Public Perceptions of Flood Danger & Risk

  20. Questions? Thank You

More Related