560 likes | 809 Views
A New Silicon Valley ? The State Vs Spontaneous Order. Pierre Desrochers University of Toronto - Geography. Overview. Introduction 1) Geography & Economic Development 2) Silicon Valley & Clusters - SV: Facts & Myths - Replicating SV & Creating Clusters
E N D
A New SiliconValley?The State Vs Spontaneous Order Pierre Desrochers University of Toronto - Geography
Overview Introduction 1) Geography & Economic Development 2) Silicon Valley & Clusters - SV: Facts & Myths - Replicating SV & Creating Clusters 3) Case against Regional Economic Specialization Conclusion
But Success? What do we Know? First, back to the basics of regional economic development…
1. Geography & Economic Development Economic Activity in a Spiky World (Florida et al.)
Nordhaus et al. Canada
Key Point: Cities ~ EconomicDevelopment SCHEDEL, Hartmann , Nuremberg, 1493
Why (large & diversified) Cities? • Conventional explanations: • Trade (marketplace) • Urbanization economies Towns = crossroads
Élisée Reclus(1895) « Wherethereis city growth, humanity moves forward…; Where they flounder, civilization itself is in danger. »
Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics(1890) “In Russia… there are an immense number of villages each of which carries on only one branch of production, or even only a part of one.”
Russialate 19th C (Marshall) « There are for instance over 500 villages devoted to various branches of woodwork; one village makesnothing but spokes for the wheels of vehicles; anothernothing but the bodies and so on; and indications of a like state of things are found in • histories of oriental civilizations • chronicles of medieval Europe »
Why Industrial Specialization? Combination of factors • specialized labour pool • localized economies of scale (specialized suppliers & infrastructure) • knowledgespillovers • research institutions
Academic Understanding & Policy:Problems • Chicken (cities/clusters) or Egg (economic development)? • Tautology (cities/clusters & agglomeration economies) • Proximity & smart people (and then what?)
« Local DevelopmentPolicies » • State Vs Markets: • Decades of experience(s) • What have welearned?
Facts Earlydecades 20th C: • San Francisco - radio technology & maritime hub; • Local businesses: Federal Telegraph (1909), Magnovox (1917), Heintz & Kaufman (1921), Kolster Radio Corp (1928), Litton Engineering Laboratories (1932), Eitel & McCullough (1934) Mid 20th C: • Cluster of vacuum tube manufacturers • Stanford U & Frederic Terman • Bill Shockley& transistors (left Bell Lab NJ for Palo Alto – family & business (« buzz ») reasons • Spin-offs: « TraitorousEight » - Fairchildsemiconductors • « Fairchildren » and others: Intel, H-P, Apple…
Uniqueness of SiliconValley? Growthprocesses? • Same as elsewhere (Detroit/Akron/Italy/Germany) Government Interventions? • Militarycontracts (but typically building on existingfirms) University? • StanfordUniversity – applied and very good / best
Silicon Somewhere & Clusters Many • policy makers • intellectual entrepreneurs • real estate promoters have tried to create • “growth poles” • “high-tech parks” • “industrial districts,” • “clusters” Charles de Gaulle
François PERROUX (1903-1987) • (1955) “Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance,” ÉconomieAppliquée 8: 307-320 • « GrowthPoles » climax: 1965 – 1975
Main Outcomes • Political and Economic/Geographic Logics incompatible… • « Targeting » and « PlannedExternalEconomies of Scale » don’tdeliver… • Spontaneous « GrowthPoles » keptappearing…
Michael PORTER(1947- ) 1990 • Clusters (pro-specialization, but with nuances…)
Lessons? Successes few and far between Main factors of success • Prior locations (near thriving areas) • Formalization of spontaneous growth • Exceptional locations & sustained public efforts (Raleigh-Durham; Sophia-Antipolis), but mostly relocations of large firm operations Most overhyped factor: • “World Class” academic institutions
Recurring Problems • What is a cluster? • Politicians picking winners? • stealing from Peter to pay Paul • everyone targets same trendy industries • Politics (corruption) as usual… • selection of locations • favored businesses
Fundamental Problem: The Case for Local Diversity • Urbanization economies • Multiplier effect • Stability & resiliency • Jacobs’ externalities
Stability & Resiliency Putting all eggs in one basket?
Knowledge Spillovers Local Economy Specialized Diversified │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Monopoly Several small Firms ____________________________________________
Case for Jacobs’ Spillovers If • innovation = new combinations; then • diverse region = more opportunities; then • more opportunities = more innovative • more innovative = more economically prosperous Can you plan “diversity” and “Jacobs spillovers”? • Can you plan spontaneity? • Growth poles experience • How does cross-fertilization actually occur?
“Collective” Creativity (Desrochers & Leppala) 1) Multidisciplinary teams within a firm; 2) Employees adding to, or switching, product line; 3) Individuals moving between different lines of work; 4) Individuals observing a product/process in another setting and incorporating it into their main activity; 5) Individuals possessing different skills and working for different firms collaborating with each other.
Probably most important process… Why do people move? bored job loss better opportunities lack credentials / interest administrative work Key issue: Remove obstacles to job mobility Job mobility between industries in the same diversified local economy