1 / 40

FEV 1 /FVC? FEV 1 /FEV 6 ?

FEV 1 /FVC? FEV 1 /FEV 6 ?. Prof Dr Nurhayat YILDIRIM İÜ Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Departement of Pulmonary Disease. Tiffenau and Pinelli published first results recording forced expiration manoeuvres in 1947.

gezana
Download Presentation

FEV 1 /FVC? FEV 1 /FEV 6 ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FEV1/FVC? FEV1/FEV6? Prof Dr Nurhayat YILDIRIM İÜ Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Departement of Pulmonary Disease

  2. Tiffenau and Pinelli published first results recording forced expiration manoeuvres in 1947. • Tiffenau defined the ratio between the FEV1 and VC in 1949. Yernault JC. ERJ 1997 ;10:2704-2710.

  3. Forced expiration manoeuvres time depandes on patient’s ability to cooperate. • It is a fact that the performance of the technician effects the spirometry.

  4. Slow and not forced VC measurement is always greater than forced VC measurement. • IVC > EVC > FVC • IVC manoeuvre requires extra measurement. • (E)VC > FVC

  5. Gas volume exhaled (FVC) during the forced expiration time, is closest to that exhaled during slow expiration (VC). • FEV1/FVC < FEV1/VC

  6. FEV1/FVC is the GOLD STANDARTat definingan obstruction.

  7. End of test criteria • The volume-time curve shows no change in volume (<0.025 L) for ≥1 s, and the subject hastried to exhale for ≥ 3 s in children aged < 10 yrs and for ≥ 6 s in subjects aged > 10 yrs. • The subject cannot or should not continue futher exhalation. Miller MR. ERJ 2005;26:319-338.

  8. The difrences between the FVC and FEV1 values of two tests had to be less than 200 mL. ATS. AJRCCM 1995;152:1107-1136

  9. FVC?FEV6?

  10. Glindmeyer has found that 6.64 s was sufficient to obtain 99% of FVC for spirograms with FEV1/FVC as low as 50%. Glinmeyer HW. ARRD 1987;136:449-452.

  11. COPD COPD Second(s)

  12. In severely obstructed patients, the total exhalation may last up to 20 s. • Using FEV1/FEV6 ratio as an alternative to FEV1/FVC may reduce the sensitivity of detection of obstructive lung disease in the diagnosis of airway obstruction Swanney MP. AJRCCM 2000;162:917-919.

  13. In severely obstructed patients, the total exhalation may last for up to 20 s. • Using FEV1/FEV6 ratio as an alternative to FEV1/FVC may reduce the sensitivity of detection of obstructive lung disease in the diagnosis of airway obstruction. Swanney MP. AJRCCM 2000;162:917-919.

  14. Flow after 6 seconds of forced expiration, coming from more diseaed lung ünits with the longest time constants, was most meaningful and should not be ignored. Hansen JE. ERJ 2006

  15. FVC >FEV6FEV1/FVC <FEV1/FEV6

  16. FEV1/FVC? FEV1/FEV6? Prof Dr Nurhayat YILDIRIM İÜ Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Departement of Pulmonary Disease

  17. The difrences between the FVC and FEV1 values of two tests had to be less than 200 mL. ATS. AJRCCM 1995;152:1107-1136

  18. Hansen JE. ERJ 2006

  19. DemirT. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  20. FEV1/FVC < %70 KOAH is the criteria in obstruction diagnosis.Studies that recommend FEV6 value instead of FVC, find useful the FEV1/FEV6 < %73 ratio as the obstruction criteria.

  21. The new cutoff value for FEV1/FEV6 • When the cutoff value is 73% the sensitivity is 94.4% and the specificity 93.3% • When the cutoff değeri 76% the sensitivity is %76 and the specificity 100%. Vandevoorde J. Chest 2005;127:1560-1564.

  22. FEV1/FVC vs FEV1/FEV6 Author Sens Spes PPD NPD Case • Swanney 95 97.4 98.6 91.1 337 • Vandevoo 94 93.1 89.8 96 11676 • Akpınar- El 92 98 92 98 1139 13152 • Hansen 76.7 98.2 90.3 95.2 66.2 99.4 91.2 96.5 22571 • Demir 86 100 100 92.2 5114 • Ulubay 78.3 100 100 89.9 1509 • Başyiğit 82.1 99.4 98.9 90.4 570 • Fidan 70.1 100 4672 34 416 11865

  23. VC >FVC >FEV6FEV1/VC <FEV1/FVC <FEV1/FEV6 FEV1/VC <FEV1/FVC < LLN

  24. Hansen JE. ERJ 2006;

  25. Hansen JE. ERJ 2006;

  26. Akpınar-Elçi M. ERJ 2006;27:374-377.

  27. Akpınar-Elçi M. ERJ 2006;27:374-377.

  28. Demir T. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  29. Demir T. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  30. Demir T. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  31. Demir T. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  32. Demir T. Respir Med 2005;99:103-106.

  33. By replacing FVC with FEV6 and using the proper referance equations, the sensitivity of the FEV6 method was 0.94, which means that 6% of the subjects would be classified as healthy, eventhough they were ill. Akpınar-Elçi M. ERJ 2006;27:374-377. Pedersen OF. ERJ 2006;27:345-347.

More Related