1 / 12

Akira OMOTO Director, Division of Nuclear Power a.omoto@iaea

Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development how to harmonize efforts to face the challenges?. Akira OMOTO Director, Division of Nuclear Power a.omoto@iaea.org. Background: International support to new countries. Various international initiative and suppliers are willing to support

gheyer
Download Presentation

Akira OMOTO Director, Division of Nuclear Power a.omoto@iaea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development how to harmonize efforts to face the challenges? Akira OMOTODirector, Division of Nuclear Powera.omoto@iaea.org

  2. Background: International support to new countries • Various international initiative and suppliers are willing to support • GNEP, EC, G8, WANO, WNA, Bilateral arrangement • Players in the market (Suppliers, Consultants) • Agency’s support has limitation due toavailable resources • details in implementation by practitioners • technology specific support by Suppliers • Coordination may be necessary, with the following objectives • To make sure recipients needs are addressed appropriately • Effective use of international resources • Avoid overlap & speak in one voice • International confidence building on the country’s NP programme WS, 2009 December

  3. Key to successful coordinated support : information • Information from Supplier/Recipient on what is going on • Results from infrastructure assessment indicating infrastructure status and distance to the goal Collected information From Supplier/Recipient • Country: Effective use of integrated assistance • b) IAEA: Reflect on TCP • c) International concerted efforts to • to address the recognized gaps • d) Confidence building by meeting • suppliers/bankers expectation • (“nuclear-worthiness”) Self-assessment Recognized status & distance to milestone Agency’s independent Assessment (INIR) WS, 2009 December

  4. Various approach conceivable • Issue specific global WG • Global forum for sharing experiences & LL from infrastructure building and infrastructure assessment • A group approach centered around a specific recipient country Sharing information of a) infrastructure assessment & b) assistance by International Non-Gov Organs 1,2 and bilateral agreement with provider countries A, B, C Country A Country X INO 1 Country B INO 2 IAEA Country C WS, 2009 December

  5. Need further discussion • If coordination or harmonized action is necessary or not ? 2. If it is needed, • What is the objective of harmonization / coordination? • What is the role of the Agency and added value by Agency’s involvement? • Is there willingness to share information from both sides ? • How the collected information can be used? • Extent of sharing of information? • Modality of coordination WS, 2009 December

  6. BTW, something I forgot to say in my presentation on the first day For long-term planning of future energy system including nuclear power, consider the use of IAEA tools: a) For consideration of SD; EISD (Energy Indicator for Sustainable Development ) b) For energy planning; Energy Planning Tools CA (Comparative Assessment) c) To achieve higher goals in safety, security, economics, waste, environment, proliferation-resistance and infrastructure for nuclear power and fuel cycle: INPRO assessment methodology WS, 2009 December

  7. Energy Indicator for Sustainable Development (EISD) • Many attributes of nuclear energy have potential to contribute to improve indicators of sustainable development • Potential to improve EISD of a nation by having NE in the energy portfolio • 29 EISD indicators : • Society (4) • Economy (15) • Environment (10) • usable to • Analyze past trends and current situation • Measure distance to target • Formulate strategy WS, 2009 December

  8. MAED WASP ENPEP MESSAGE FINPLAN SIMPACTS • IAEA tools for Energy Modeling and • Comparative Assessment • Model for the Analysis of Energy Demand • Wien Automatic System Planning Package • Energy and Power Evaluation Programme • Model for Energy Supply System Alternatives and their General Environmental impacts • Financial Analysis of Electric Sector Expansion Plans • Simplified Approach for Estimating Impacts of Electricity Generation WS, 2009 December

  9. Networking: INPRO -- Forum of technology holders and users jointly to consider innovation WS, 2009 December

  10. Structure of INPRO methodology Basic Principal User Requirement Criterion (Indicator +Accept. Limit) WS, 2009 December

  11. Issues in harmonization/coordination What is the objective? • Benefit for the recipients • Effective use of resources, avoid overlap, speak in one voice • International/regional confidence building on the country’s NP programme What is the potential added value by Agency’s coordination? • Impartial coordination • Located at the crossroad of information on new countries development through TCP and others. • A unique authority in verification and establishing standards for safety and security. Through Agency’s involvement in the coordination, obligations and pre-requisites are recognized among all the providers of support, which will benefit ensuring safe and secure and nuclear power programme with due regards to proliferation-resistance in new countries. WS, 2009 December

  12. …Thank you for your attention WS, 2009 December

More Related