1 / 22

ERES Doctoral Session: Capitalization rates as risk indicator for (non-)efficient properties?

ERES Doctoral Session: Capitalization rates as risk indicator for (non-)efficient properties?. Elaine Wilke Real Estate Management Institute EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht Söhnleinstraße 8d 65201 Wiesbaden.

Download Presentation

ERES Doctoral Session: Capitalization rates as risk indicator for (non-)efficient properties?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ERES Doctoral Session:Capitalization rates as risk indicator for (non-)efficient properties? Elaine Wilke Real Estate Management Institute EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht Söhnleinstraße 8d 65201 Wiesbaden

  2. Agenda:Capitalization rates as risk indicators for (non-) efficient properties? 1.0 Introduction / Research objective 2.0 Data and Research Method 3 .0 Results 4.0 Conclusion Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  3. 1.0 Introduction • Risk of (non-)efficient properties • so far only research and publications from the investors’ perspective • But: most sustainability aspects influence the operating and occupancy costs of the occupier; • these costs are not taken into consideration when calculating the NOI • how are the results going to change if also the occupiers’ goals are considered? • investors: higher net rents and/or higher returns • occupiers: reduced operation and occupancy costs • both perspectives interact in the valuation process: • sustainable (efficient) properties realize higher Capital Values than non-sustainable (efficient) properties, • as sustainability (efficiency) reduces the property specific risk • Hypothesis: • The capitalization rate as all risks yield interacts as indicator for the risk of (non-) efficient properties • higher risk premiums for non-efficient properties! Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  4. Capitalization rates as risk indicators for (non-) efficient properties? 1.0 Introduction / Research objective 2.0 Data and Research Method 3 .0 Results 4.0 Conclusion Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  5. 2.1 Data • Data from Investors and Occupiers: • IPD Investment Property Databank UK • IPD Occupiers Databank UK • Sample size n = 47 objects (in both databanks for 2007 and 2008) Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  6. 2.2 Research Method • Partial Least Squares (PLS) – method • (according to Wold) • causal relationships between (in)dependant (latent) variables • also available for smaller sample sizes • any measurement levels • separate calculation for 2007 and 2008 • Illustration of the cause-effect relations • (directions and sings) between the hypothesis • and the latent variables. Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  7. 2.3 Base Model Block 2 Model latent exogenous variable Reflective Structure Model latent exogenous variable Reflective Structure Block 3 Block 1 Block 4 Model latent exogenous variable Formative Structure Model latent endogenous variable Reflective Structure Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  8. 2.4 Indicators Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  9. 2.4 Indicator - Total Operating Costs per sqm IPD International Total Occupancy Cost Code (ITOCC): • Elements of the IPD Total Operating Costs per sqm: • consolidated service charge • insurance • internal repair and maintenance • M&A repair and maintenance • external/structural repair and maintenance • minor improvements • internal moves • reinstatement • security • cleaning • waste disposal • internal plants and flowers • ground maintenance • water, sewerage • energy Source: IPD ITOCC 4th edition Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  10. Capitalization rates as risk indicators for (non-) efficient properties? 1.0 Introduction / Research objective 2.0 Data and Research Method 3 .0 Results 4.0 Conclusion Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  11. 3.1 Base Model (2007) R² Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  12. 3.1 Base Model (2007) • Model quality criteria: • AVE > 0.5 • Composite Reliability > 0.7 • Cronbach‘s Alpha > 0.7 • Modification of the model! Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  13. 3.2 Model – modified (2007) R² • AVE > 0.70 • Composite Reliability > 0.7 • Composite Reliability > Cronbach‘s Alpha • Cronbach‘s Alpha ~ 0.7 Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  14. 3.2 Model – modified (2007) Discriminant Validity • Outer Loadings > 0.7 • support validation of reflective model • Cross Loadings < Outer Loadings • no multicollinearity • degree to which two measures designed to measure similar or conceptually related constructs: • √AVE > Latent Variable Correlation • no relation Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  15. 3.2 Model – modified (2007) - Bootstrapping • Estimating the distribution of the statistic by using the bootstrapping method • The calculation is based on 300 cases and 500 samples • standard errors with values < 0.04 suggest a low level of uncertainty • T Statistics indicate a good fit of the model explaining the degree of variability of the dependent • variable Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  16. 3.2 Model – modified (2007) R² = 27,53% GoF = 0,401 • bigger role in explaining than in predicting as q² <f² • The effect size (f²) with a value of 0.088 has to be interpreted according to Cohen as a • low to medium effect with f² <0.15. • Q² with 0.267 implies predictive relevance • The calculated GoF (.401) is higher than the marginal value of > .275 indicating that the • model strongly fits the set of observations. Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  17. 3.3 Model – modified (2008) R² • AVE ~ 0.70 • Composite Reliability > 0.7 • Composite Reliability > Cronbach‘s Alpha • Cronbach‘s Alpha ~ 0.7 Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  18. Capitalization rates as risk indicators for (non-) efficient properties? 1.0 Introduction / Research objective 2.0 Data and Research Method 3 .0 Results 4.0 Conclusion Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  19. 4.0 Conclusion Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  20. 4.0 Base Model Block 2 Model latent exogenous variable Reflective Structure Model latent exogenous variable Reflective Structure Block 3 Block 1 Block 4 Model latent exogenous variable Formative Structure Model latent endogenous variable Reflective Structure Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  21. 4.0 Conclusion • so far only minor consideration of property characteristics in the derivation of the cap rate • changes in the (economic) environment dominate the choice of the risk premium • no integration of use efficiency • occupiers’ perspectives are ignored • future consideration of (non-)efficiency ? • review of the interrelations with bigger sample sizes Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

  22. Capitalization rates as risk indicators for (non-) efficient properties? Thank you! Elaine Wilke REMI, 2010-06-23

More Related