1 / 29

Unquenching the Quark Model

Unquenching the Quark Model. Motivation Required ingredients Self-consistent baryon masses in presence of continuum (baryon-meson) states SU(6) (flavor-spin) symmetry Minimum set of intermediate states Prior and ongoing work Lessons from covariant calculation of  - 

gilon
Download Presentation

Unquenching the Quark Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  2. Unquenching the Quark Model • Motivation • Required ingredients • Self-consistent baryon masses in presence of continuum (baryon-meson) states • SU(6) (flavor-spin) symmetry • Minimum set of intermediate states • Prior and ongoing work • Lessons from covariant calculation of - • Collaborators: Danielle Morel (PhD@FSU, JMU); Mike Pichowsky (Chicago mercantile exchange), Sameer Walawalkar (PhD@FSU, CMU);Eric Swanson (Pittsburgh);Ted Barnes (ORNL/U Tennesssee, Knoxville) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  3. Motivation E. Teller: “From mesons all manner of forces you get; the infinite part, you simply forget” Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  4. Motivation… • In QCD qqq(qq) configurations possible in baryons: effect on CQM? • Expand in basis of baryon-meson intermediate states • B’M loops a self energies ~O(G), mixing • requires calculation of form factors • Many thresholds close in energy (k) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  5. Required ingredients To calculate self energies and mixing: • Need model of spectrum (including states not seen in experiment) a wave functions a vertices • Need model of B(0) a B’(-k)M(k) vertices and their momentum dependence • Focus on baryons • Many calculations of effects in mesons exist, not surveyed here Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  6. Self-consistent mass calculation • Assume your qqq (bare) quark model baryon masses M0B depend on: • Parameters: strong coupling 0, quark mass m0, string tension b0…, 3P0 (pair creation) coupling strength  • Hamiltonians: Hqqq, Hpc • Parameters determined by a fit to the spectrum and decays in the absence of higher Fock-space components EB = M0B(0,m0,b0,…) = physical mass Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  7. Self-consistent quark model masses… • Correction due to B ! B’C iswhere • Imaginary part of loop integral is ½B! B’C • Perform sum over B’C intermediate states • Adjust parameters 0,m0,b0… for self-consistent solution with EB = physical mass • In principle should solve a similar equation for meson masses EC Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  8. Self-consistent mass calculation • Equivalent to second order perturbation theory in decay Hamiltonian Hpc • Can calculate the (momentum space) continuum (B’C) component of physical baryon states • Can calculate the mixing between different baryon states due to continuum states (B! B’C! B’’) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  9. Intermediate (continuum) states • Baryon self energy due to individual B’M loops are comparable to widths – convergence? • Calculations applied to N, D, L, S, ground and L=1 states; • Intermediate states B’M • Ground states baryonsB’{N, D, L, S, S*} • Mesons: • Blask, Huber and Metsch (’87)used ground state (pseudoscalar) octet mesonsM{p, K, h , h} • Zenczykowski (’86), Silvestre-Brac and Gignoux (’91), Y. Fujiwara (’93) used pseudoscalar and vector mesonsM{p, K, h, h, r, w, K*} Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  10. Intermediate states… • Essential problem: there are lots of B’M thresholds nearby in energy • Nr, Dr similar thresholds to N(1535)p, L(1116)K, etc. • Cannot study effects on spectrum by restricting M to p (or even all pseudoscalars) or B’ to N, D (or even all octet and decuplet ground states) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  11. SU(6) (flavor-spin) symmetry • Zenczykowski: gedanken experiment • assume SU(3)fSU(2)spin, only ground state B, B’ and M exist • assume all octet and decuplet ground state baryons have same mass M0B & same wvfn. • assume all pseudoscalar and vector ground state mesons have mass M0M & same wvfn. • All loop integrals now the same, apart from SU(6) factor at vertices: D = N ? Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  12. SU(6)flavor-spin weights Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  13. SU(6) flavor symmetry limit aSum of loops for N and D same only if include all B’M combinations (non-strange, strange, or both) consistent with quantum numbers • Need both pseudoscalar and vector mesons • This is true for any baryon in the [56,0+] ground states (octet and decuplet baryons), sum is 48 • Also true in 3P0 model (reduces to SU(6)W in this limit) • If all the thresholds and all wave functions are the same, there are no mass splittings between ground state baryons • Requires: • SU(3)f breaking turned off (ms = mu,d) • Spin-dependent splittings (-N, -, etc.) turned off Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  14. Away from SU(3)f limit • Relax assumption of SU(3)f symmetry in meson & baryon masses (Tornqvist & Zenczykowski, ’84) • Use • Assume: • Spectral function (s,mB,mM) broad, on scale of baryon mass splittings (ultimately calculate using 3P0) Assume form (s,mB,mM) = (s½ -[mB+mM]) • Assume: m0N = m0´ m00m0 = m0L = m0* = m00 + 0´ m01 m0X = m0X*= m00 + 20´ m02 m0W=m00 + 30´ m03 • Similar pattern of SU(3)f breaking for meson masses (m = m, ideal mixing,…) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  15. Away from SU(3)f limit… • Only two thresholds for each external baryon with k strange quarks: • Non-strange quark pair production Ek0, strange quark pair production Ek0+2 • Call sums over relevant SU(6) weights wk0, and wk2 • Adopt similar notation for output baryon masses: mN = m´ m0m = mL = m* ´ m1 mX = mX*´ m2 mW´m3 • Mass shifts: Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  16. Away from SU(3)f limit… • Ignores factor • [Close to 1 if mk small c.f. hxi +Ek0, but following works without this assumption] • From SU(6)/3P0: wk+12 - wk2 = 4 for k = 0,1,2 • Subtract integral relation for k from the same one for k+1 • Work to first order in mk+1-mk, 0,  Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  17. Away from SU(3)f limit… • Independent of k: • Output baryon masses show same pattern as input masses • The difference in pole positions in the r.h.s. of the (self-consistent) integral equation leads to  in denominator Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  18. Away from SU(6)fs limit • Now assume: • Ground-state baryon masses exhibit this simple equal-spacing pattern • PS and V mesons have their experimental values • Now output masses exhibit SU(6)fs breaking effects • E.g. m - mN 0 • In first order in meson mass differences, c´ cos(P), s´ sin(P) (perfect mixing P=10o) • Constant C / d(-N)/dEthreshold > 0 (as threshold becomes more distant, mass shift decreases) [but 0.18  + 0.82 0] Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  19. Away from SU(6)fs limit • Similar formulae can be derived for *-, -, *-,... • If intermediate baryon masses already split (by e.g. OGE, with similar pattern) • If meson masses satisfy Gell-Mann Okubo SU(6) mass formula • Get 2N + 2 = 3 +  (Gell-Mann Okubo, octet) • Get * -  = * - * =  - * (equal spacing rule for decuplet) • Get * -  = * -  (SU(6) relation) • Recover SU(6) relations for baryon masses! Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  20. Both mechanisms necessary • Result is very interesting • Can interpret SU(6) breaking effects in baryon spectrum as partly due to spin-flavor dependent exchanges (e.g. OGE) • Partly due to loop effects • (not same as OBE) Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  21. Results from prior work… • Effects on spectrum are substantial • Zenczykowski finds many mass splittings close to analyses without qqq residual interactions • Other calculations show splittings in bare P-wave baryon masses which resemble spin-orbit effects (Blask, Huber and Metsch, Silvestre-Brac and Gignoux, Fujiwara) • Solution to spin-orbit problem in baryons? • Lack self-consistent treatment of external and intermediate states—converged? • Such convergence slower in 3P0 NRQM: mesons, Geiger and Isgur • Faster in covariant model based on Schwinger-Dyson Bethe-Salpeter approach: M. Pichowsky, S. Walawalkar, SC Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  22. Baryon self energies in relativized 3P0 model • PhD thesis of Danielle Morel (PhD@FSU, now at JMU); study N, D ground and L=1 excited external states • Calculate vertices as a function of loop momentum using 3P0 model (analytic, Maple) • Use mixed relativized-model wavefunctions (expanded up to N=7 band) • Include intermediate states BM with • Mesons M{p, K, h, h, r, w, K*} • Baryons B{N, D, L, S, S*}, including all excitations up to N=3 band • Roughly 300 to 500 intermediate states! Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  23. Baryon self energies in relativized 3P0 model… • Usual 3P0 model gives vertices that are too hard, loops get large contributions from high momenta • Soften with pair-creation operator form factor ~exp(-f2[pq-pq]2) • Currently revisiting calculation to allow self-consistent renormalization of quark model parameters (hard work!) • T. Barnes and E. Swansonlooking at shifts in charmonium spectrum due to D,D*,Ds,Ds* meson pairs Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  24. - splitting in a covariant model • Are large self energies from hadron loops an artifact of a non-relativistic approach, or of the 3P0 model? • M. Pichowsky, S. Walawalkar, S.C. [PRD60, 054030 (1999)] • Examine  and  self energies in covariant model based on Schwinger-Dyson approach • Calculated pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar and vector-pseudoscalar loops Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  25. Loop calculation • Vector-pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar (VPP) form factors from quark loop integrations (similarly for VVP) • Requires: • knowledge of the u-, d- and s-quark propagators • P and V meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes • taken from phenomenological studies of EM form factors and strong and weak decays of P and V mesons Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  26. Form factors • Form factors are evaluated numerically and fit to simple exponential form (VPP) • fVPP(p1,p2) • Note additional suppression when mP > mV/2 Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  27. Results • Self energies rapidly decrease with increasing mass of the intermediate state mesons • Form factors significantly softer than in NRQM/3P0 model calculations • Additional suppression with mass Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  28. Conclusions/Outlook • The next Fock-space component is likely more important than differences among qqq models • calculating its effects requires: • Use of full SU(6)-related set of intermediate states, spatially-excited intermediate baryons • Careful treatment of mixing • Renormalization of parameters in quark model needs to be carried out • Renormalize s, quark masses, string tension • This requires examining mass shifts of more than just N, , and their negative-parity excitations • Need additional suppression when mB >> mB ’+ mM Simon Capstick, Florida State University

  29. Simon Capstick, Florida State University

More Related