1 / 25

Payment for being an involved service user/carer

Payment for being an involved service user/carer. Sue Hinder & Sara Morris 26 January 2006. Background. Offering payment to recognise value of people’s contribution is seen as good practice. Recently more guidelines have become available: INVOLVE (2003)

gino
Download Presentation

Payment for being an involved service user/carer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Payment for being an involved service user/carer Sue Hinder & Sara Morris 26 January 2006

  2. Background Offering payment to recognise value of people’s contribution is seen as good practice. Recently more guidelines have become available: • INVOLVE (2003) • Social Care Institute for Excellence (2005) • Department of Health (2006)

  3. The options • Volunteering • Expenses reimbursed only • Payment for work done • Variable rates for variable involvement • Allowances and fees • Salaried posts • Key element of social inclusion • Continuity of involvement • Becoming professional?

  4. Volunteering • Involvement can be on a voluntary basis • Undertaken freely and by choice • Rewards? • May be moral benefits – helping improve services • May be personal benefits – e.g. social and learning opportunities • Out of pocket expenses reimbursed • Travel, carers, telephone, personal assistant etc • Reimbursement of expenses and advice about benefits entitlement - reported as an important factor in whether people volunteered (National Centre for Volunteering survey)

  5. Payment and value • Reward and recognition • Incentive • “Ideally,remuneration should reflect the commitment given to the organisation and the impact on the person’s life or work responsibilities” (WDC) • Enabling equitable access to involvement – broader range of people • Supports balancing power differential in research team

  6. Making payments • Type of activity • Levels of responsibility • Skills and experience • Time and commitment • Hourly/ daily/ flat/ sessional rates? • Employment rules and regulations likely to apply (e.g. minimum wage)

  7. Some examples of rates

  8. How Payment affects Benefits • Governed by Permitted Work rules • £78 per week • Less than 16 hours per week • 2 or 3 days a month • Permitted Work (work, training or voluntary) must be reported.

  9. Earnings Disregard • Means-tested benefits • Every penny over £20 taken off benefits • £10 if with a partner • Does not take into account that you may earn £60 one week and nothing the next • But can pay monthly in arrears

  10. Supported Permitted Work • Named support worker • £78 per week and allowed to keep it all.

  11. Non means-tested benefits • Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance (without means-tested top up) can earn £78 per week and keep it. • Disability Living Allowance (for care and mobility needs) not affected by earnings but involvement may prompt needs to be re-assessed.

  12. Non means-tested benefits • Permitted work for 6 months • Can be extended by another 6 months • After 12 months claimant can reduce earnings to £20 per week or; • Do Supported Permitted Work with a named support worker.

  13. Child care costs • Up to £60 per week for child under 11 years. • Must be with a registered childminder • Does not affect benefits

  14. One-off cash gifts • Will not affect benefits so long as they do not breach the savings rule.

  15. Tax • Research volunteers, lay participants, participants in clinical trials allowed reasonable costs for travel, subsistence and participation without being liable to tax. • Excess of “reasonable costs” are taxable as Miscellaneous Income

  16. Tax • If amount paid for “reasonable costs” is £8,500 or more then treated as earnings. • Donating to charity can affect both tax and benefits.

  17. Payment methods • Variety of methods • “Skating on thin ice” • Gift vouchers – unclear • LETS systems – only £100 per year • Pay to voluntary organisation and grant to individual. • Is there a legal way of doing it?

  18. Confused? • Lack of clarity • Lack of understanding by Jobcentre Plus staff • Risk of being seen as fit for work.

  19. Scared? • Difficulty of signing off and and on again • Risk of losing invalidity entitlement. • Stress!!!

  20. “Consultancy on the cheap” • “Community consultants” • How much would an organisation have to pay for consultancy? • At least £500 per day

  21. What do we want? • “Earnings disregard” increased substantially. What level? • No risk of claims being re-assessed as a result of involvement • Empowering not punitive approach

  22. Political will, political lobbying • MPs • Government ministers • Opposition parties(socialpolicychallenge.com) • Parliamentary questions • Letters, meetings,websites

  23. It’s up to us • Boring but important. • Raising awareness • Giving information • Influencing the political agenda

  24. References Department of Health. Cooley A & Lawrence Z (2006) Reward and Recognition. The principles and practice of service user payment and reimbursement in health and social care. A guide for service providers, service users and carers. Department of Health Lennox A et al. A practical guide for involving the public in health and social care services. Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland Workforce Development Confederation Ryan T & Bamber C (2002) Pricing participation: A survey of organisational payment practice to users and carers for expenses time given in service development and delivery. Working Briefing paper version 1. North West Mental Health development Centre. Steel R (2003) A guide to paying members of the public actively involved in research. INVOLVE Service User Research Group England (2005) Guidance for Good Practice: Service User Involvement in the UK Mental Health Research Network. Turner M and Beresford P (2005) Contributing on equal terms: Service user involvement and the benefits system.Adult services report 08.Social Care Institute for ExcellenceSocial Care Institute for Excellence, London

  25. Websites which may be useful • INVOLVE www.invo.org.uk • Social Care Institute for Excellence www.scie.org.uk • Volunteering England www.volunteering.org.uk • Service User Research Group Englandwww.mhrn.info/dnn

More Related