190 likes | 574 Views
Jobless in their fields of study. http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/5,114944,12013424,Pokolenie_bez_szans__Mlodzi__wyksztalceni__ZDJECIA___.html. The rationale for the S 3 Can we afford losing talents in Europe?. Jerzy M Langer Academia Europaea, London,
E N D
Joblessintheirfields of study http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/5,114944,12013424,Pokolenie_bez_szans__Mlodzi__wyksztalceni__ZDJECIA___.html
Therationale for the S3Can we afford losing talents inEurope? Jerzy M Langer Academia Europaea, London, InstPhys, PolishAcadSci, Warsaw Municipality of Wroclaw, Wroclaw Smart Investment for Smart Specialization, Jachranka, Poland,27/8 June2012
European decline, why? Phd grad ths EU-27 100 US 52 In S&E 40 19 Patents/mlninh EU-27 117 US 106 Publications 38% 31% but • The EU contributes less than the US to high-impact publications • The EU is not specialised in the most dynamic research disciplines • Most Nobel Prize winners come from the USA (expats and emigrants) • Highest impact technologies come from the USA • Highest ranked universities are in the USA and • Largest growth in HE and S&T is in Asia and Brasil !!!
The focal issue How to address the young generation of talented Europeans to regain their trust, confidence and the will to build their personal future HERE - in Europe ? Polish problem vis a vis Europe isthe same as Europe vis a vis the USA
Students in Europe – the source 5 mln students in EU -10 (NMS)
InternalEuropeanbraindrain Europe cries for thehugeoutflow of youngeducatedEuropeans to the USA, but MC fellows net flowshowsthe same but inside Europe
Danger of a two-speed Europe Averagecontract Networks of Excellence
FP country financial „retour” The NMS (EU-12) todayaresubsidising EU-15, In the H2020 it will be worse
Can we affordlosing talent A huge and so far unused potential lies dormant in the new EU states The EU should seek to redress the imbalance by establishing research infrastructures in struggling countries. MiroslavTopolanek – Czech Prime Minister, 2009 In a time of crisis, it is necessary to develop a more inclusive programme that without compromising the excellence will equally recognize talent all over Europe. • EU-12 Science Ministers, 23 May 2012
New Cohesion Policy ERDF Total 255 bln € Source: P.Godin, DG REG, Eureka Acad, Brussels, 18 Jan, 2012
163 bln € 92 bln € Source: P.Godin, DG REG, Eureka Acad, Brussels, 18 Jan, 2012
General hints • SF is the EU –”Marshall Plan” • NMS must invest and not just spend. • Building a pro-innovative capacity is a must • National policy must be backed by regional &metropolitanS3 approach • Countries to follow: Finland, Israel, Korea, Norway Caring for talent is a priority
Poland – „hidden” assets The talent isthere !
Studentsin Poland Every 10th student inthe EU isPolish
OECD DATA 2007 Number of S&Tstudents 1993-2003; averageannualchange
Poland - demographicpotentialininnovativeS&T Malta (47.1%) and Poland (44.3%) had thehighestnational shares and Germany the lowest (around 22%) of young people employed in S&T (aged 25-34) among the total labour force in the 25-64 age group. Southern Polish region had the highest share in the EU, with nearly 50% of its S&T workforce aged 25-34, whereas Germany's Thüringen had the lowest (14.7%) EUROSTAT May, 2008 http://www.euractiv.com/en/socialeurope/eu-regions-ranked-high-tech-workforce/article-172402
Innovativeness doneintherightway Yes, but before • Analysis of human capital and itsperspective • Analysis of comparative advantages (no need to copy Silicon Valley) – ex anteanalysis • Local strategy collectively(region, municipality, academics, business) • Agreement and determination to change old thinking (education !!!) Smart SpecialisationStrategy