130 likes | 325 Views
The Economic Impact Of Genetically Modified Food. Presented by Giorgi Modebadze. Pros: Spend less money, produce more food Resistance to Herbicides Remove weeds, thereby protect the soil Improved Stress Tolerance Faster Growth Cons: Unexpected Health Issues, Side-Effects
E N D
The Economic Impact Of Genetically Modified Food Presented by Giorgi Modebadze
Pros: • Spend less money, produce more food • Resistance to Herbicides • Remove weeds, thereby protect the soil • Improved Stress Tolerance • Faster Growth • Cons: • Unexpected Health Issues, Side-Effects • Reduced Species Diversity • Ecological Damage • Effects on Non-GM Crops • Over-Use of Herbicides
As of 2013, roughly 85% of corn, 91% of soybeans, and 88% of cotton produced in the United States are genetically modified.
Spreading GM foods leads to selling more agricultural technology (supplements) • More technology brings more benefit to farmers • Economic benefit of GM corn to farmers in five states was $6.9 billion over the last 14 years • In 2010, GM crops increased farm incomes worldwide by $14 billion, with over half this total going to farmers in developing countries
World economic surplus increased by $840.3 million for 2010 • Of this total, • 59% - U.S. farmers, the largest share • 21% - The gene developer, Monsanto • 9% - U.S. consumers • 5% - the germplasm supplier, Delta and Pine Land Company • 6% - the rest of the world
A 2010 study showed that farmers in developed countries experienced increase in yield of 6% and in underdeveloped countries of 29% • Loss of harvest was decreased by 25–58% on soybeans, by 76% on crops • 72% of farmers worldwide experienced positive economic results.
Challenges, critiques: • The seed industry faces oligopoly, • huge market power possessed by several companies • 73% of the global market is controlled by 10 companies • Firms have started to engage in vertical integration, gradually forming a monopoly • They practice pricing strategies (price discrimination) • Allegedly, they thwart the attempts of smaller companies to enter the market.
But… • Production costs have decreased • Resulted in the economies of scale that facilitates market efficiency • Could be beneficial in raising welfare because "even though price discrimination is often considered to be an unwanted market distortion, it may increase total welfare by increasing total output, eliminating deadweight loss and by making goods available to markets where they would not appear otherwise"
Only 26 countries in the whole world banned GM foods. 28 different countries grow genetically modified crops Top 10 suppliers: USA, Brazil, Argentina, Canada, India, China, Paraguay, South Africa, Pakistan, Uruguay
List of companies using GM ingredients in their products: Blue Sky Coca Cola Hansen Kraft Nestle Procter and Gamble Libby's Ocean Spray Kellogg Nature Valley SmuckersSkippy Hormel Progresso EggoBoca Marie CallenderMorningstar Farms Stouffers Mountain Dew Amp energy drink Sun Chips Lays potato chips Doritos Tostitos Tropicana juices Dole juices Quaker Oats Aunt Jemima Syrup Rice-A-Roni Gatorade Nabisco Hershey Lifesaver Quaker Pepperidge Farm Campbells Aquafina Frito Lay Hostess Heinz Crisco KashiPeter Pan Betty Crocker Pillsbury Aunt Jemima Duncan Hines Beech-nut Enfamil Good Start SimilacIsomilYoplait Land O Lakes Keebler Dannon
Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies#Economics http://gefreebc.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/really-great-gmo-statistics/ http://chartsbin.com/view/1278 http://www.ksre.ksu.edu/bookstore/pubs/MF2449.pdf http://knowledge.allianz.com/?500/gm-crops-facts-and-figures http://www.infowars.com/economic-issues-surrounding-genetically-modified-foods/